Article published in:
Who’s really normal? Language and sexuality in public space
Edited by Mie Hiramoto
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 4:2] 2015
► pp. 254–271

The subversive potential of queer pornography

A systemic-functional analysis of a written online text

| Lancaster University, United Kingdom
This paper addresses the question of what potential queer pornography has to subvert hegemonic discourses of gender and sexuality. In particular, it engages in the analysis of transitivity and metaphor in an example of queer written online pornography and links this textual analysis to a discussion of the role of text distribution and consumption in realising any subversive potential. The analysis shows that in terms of participant representation, the text reinforces rather than challenges hegemonic discourses of gender and sexuality: Although the main protagonists are both ambiguously sexed, patterns of transitivity and use of metaphor construct largely binary gender identities for them, allocating sexual activity to the first-person narrator while casting the Other as passively desiring. In terms of its distribution and consumption, however, the text maintains its subversive potential as it sexualises a public online space and can turn offline public space into a sexual place.
Keywords: transitivity, written pornography, space/place, systemic-functional linguistics, queer discourse studies, online discourse
Published online: 18 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.04kol
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lischinsky, Alon
2018. Doing the naughty or having it done to you? Agent roles in erotic writing. Porn Studies 5:2 ► pp. 156 ff. Crossref logo
Seehuus, Martin, Ariel B. Handy & Amelia M. Stanton
2020. Change in the Popularity of Transgressive Content in Written Erotica between 2000 and 2016. The Journal of Sex Research ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Adams-Thies, Brian
2012 Fluid bodies or bodily fluids: Bodily reconfigurations in cybersex. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1: 179–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Feona & Smith, Clarissa
2014 Porn studies: An introduction. Porn Studies 1: 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2004 Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 32: 346–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty
2002 Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory? In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bell, David & Valentine, Gill
1995 Introduction: Orientations. In Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities, David Bell & Gill Valentine (eds), 1–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
2004 Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33: 469–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
2003 Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea
1989 Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Glenn, John D.
1981 Gay fantasies in gay publications. In Gayspeak: Gay Male and Lesbian Communication, James W. Chesebro (ed), 104–113. New York: The Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
Green, Adam I., Follert, Mike, Osterlund, Kathy & Paquin, Jamie
2010. Space, place and sexual sociality: Towards an ‘atmospheric analysis’. Gender, Work and Organization 17: 7-27.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M.
2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heywood, John
1997 ‘The object of desire is the object of contempt’: Representations of masculinity in Straight to Hell magazine. In Language and Masculinity, Sally Johnson & Ulrike H. Meinhof (eds), 188–207. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holbrook, David
(ed) 1972 The Case Against Pornography. London: Tom Stacey.Google Scholar
Ingram, Gordon B., Bouthillette, Anne-Marie & Retter, Yolanda
(eds) 1997 Queers in Space: Communities, Public Places, Sites of Resistance. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2008 Technology, democracy and participation in space. In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, Ruth Wodak & Veronika Koller (eds), 429–446. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott
2002 Playing the straight man: Displaying and maintaining male heterosexuality in discourse. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 249–266. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
King, Brian W.
2011 Language, sexuality and place: The view from cyberspace. Gender and Language 5: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Location, lore and language: An erotic triangle. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1: 106–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2004 Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 No ordinary boy: Language, masculinities and queer pornography. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 156–173. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leap, William L.
2011 Language, gay pornography, and audience reception. Journal of Homosexuality 58: 932–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lischinsky, Alon
2015 Doing the naughty or having it done to you: Agent roles in erotic writing. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2015 conference, Lancaster/UK, 20–24 July. https://​www​.academia​.edu​/14348005 (August 13, 2015)Google Scholar
Long, Julia
2012 Anti-Porn: The Resurgence of Anti-Pornography Feminism. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine
1993 Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, Alan
2014 Humanities and social scientific research methods in porn studies. Porn Studies 1: 53–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNair, Brian
2002 Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen
2011 Discourse and identity in a corpus of lesbian erotica. Journal of Lesbian Studies 15: 122–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2010 Language, Gender and Sexuality: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paasonen, Susanna
2007 Epilogue: Porn futures. In Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture, Susanna Paasonen, Kaarina Nikunen & Laura Saarenmaa (eds), 161–170. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Paasonen, Susanna, Nikunen, Kaarina & Saarenmaa, Laura
(eds) 2007 Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Pendleton, David
1992 Obscene allegories: Narrative, representation, pornography. Discourse 15: 154–168.Google Scholar
Ryberg, Ingrid
2012 Imagining safe space: The politics of Queer, Feminist and Lesbian pornography. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University. http://​su​.diva​-portal​.org​/smash​/get​/diva2:477159​/FULLTEXT01​.pdf (August 13, 2015)
Tibbals, C. Anne
2014 Gonzo, trannys, and teens: Current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies 1: 127–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–71. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann & Walton, Marsha
1999 The metaphorical construction of sexual experience in a speech community of New Zealand university students. British Journal of Social Psychology 38: 479–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Linda
2004 Porn studies: Proliferating pornographies on/scene: An introduction. In Porn Studies, Linda Williams (ed), 1–23. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar