Transfer Constraints and Substrate Influence in Melanesian Pidgin
Jeff Siegel | University of New England, Armidale, Australia
This study examines research on transfer in second language acquisition (SLA) in order to identify situational and linguistic factors which may constrain the influence of substrate languages on the developing grammar of a pidgin or creole. A distinction is made between the earlier transfer of L1 features by individuals attempting to use the superstrate language as an L2 for wider communication, and the later retention of a subset of these features by the community during a process of leveling which occurs during stabilization. The study outlines various transfer constraints and reinforcement principles proposed in both the second language acquisition and pidgin/creole studies literature. These are evaluated using Melanesian Pidgin and its Central-Eastern Oceanic (CEO) substrate languages as a test case. Of the potential constraints on transfer proposed in the SLA literature, the need for partial or specious congruence between superstrate and substrate structures appears to account best for the particular CEO features that were transferred. Perceptual salience accounts for the kinds of forms from English that were reanalyzed to fit CEO patterns. With regard to the retention of particular transferred features, the most significant reinforcement principle appears to be frequency in the contact environment.
2021. Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2021. Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2022. Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 369 ff.
2018. The Origins of Epenthesis in Liquid+Sonorant Clusters in Mid‐Ulster English. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:3 ► pp. 484 ff.
Gu, Qianping
2017. A corpus-based comparative study on the superlative forms in British English and Singapore Colloquial English. <i>WORD</i> 63:4 ► pp. 241 ff.
Baptista, Marlyse, Susan A. Gelman & Erica Beck
2016. Testing the role of convergence in language acquisition, with implications for creole genesis. International Journal of Bilingualism 20:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
2013. Cross-linguistic influence in language creation: Assessing the role of the Gbe languages in the formation of the Creoles of Suriname. Lingua 129 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hiramoto, Mie
2012. Pragmatics of the sentence-final uses of can in Colloquial Singapore English. Journal of Pragmatics 44:6-7 ► pp. 890 ff.
SIEGEL, JEFF
2012. Constraints on substrate transfer revisited. Journal of Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 473 ff.
Siegel, Jeff
2012. Multilingualism, Indigenization, and Creolization. In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, ► pp. 517 ff.
Siegel, Jeff
2015. The role of substrate transfer in the development of grammatical morphology in language contact varieties. Word Structure 8:2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Siegel, Jeff
2016. Contact-Induced Grammatical Change in Melanesia: Who were the Agents of Change?*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:3 ► pp. 406 ff.
ZHIMING, BAO
2012. Substratum transfer targets grammatical system. Journal of Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 479 ff.
LEE, NALA HUIYING, LING AI PING & HIROKI NOMOTO
2009. Colloquial Singapore English got: functions and substratal influences. World Englishes 28:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Dante Lucchesi, Alan N. Baxter & Ilza Ribeiro
2009. O Português Afro-Brasileiro,
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2009. Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change 21:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Sanchez, Tara
2008. Accountability in morphological borrowing: Analyzing a linguistic subsystem as a sociolinguistic variable. Language Variation and Change 20:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
2003. Markedness and salience in language contact and second-language acquisition: evidence from a non-canonical contact language. Language Sciences 25:6 ► pp. 561 ff.
Odlin, Terence
2003. Cross‐Linguistic Influence. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 436 ff.
[no author supplied]
2001. Commentary. Linguistic Typology 5:2-3
[no author supplied]
2013. Reference Guide for Varieties of English. In A Dictionary of Varieties of English, ► pp. 363 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.