Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 2:2 (2016) ► pp.225–252

The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Japanese adult listeners with and without Mandarin learning experience

 | Macquarie University, Australia
 | Waseda University, Japa
 | Waseda University, Japan
Processing lexical tones is known to be difficult for non-native speakers from various language backgrounds. Perceptual accuracy of six Mandarin tone contrasts (T1–T2, T1–T3, T1–T4, T2–T3, T2–T4, T3–T4) of two groups of Japanese listeners (learners and non-learners) and a control group of Mandarin listeners were compared in Mandarin learning experience, phonetic context, and speaker gender. Both Japanese groups perceived T2–T3 poorly, but the learner group was significantly better than the non-learner group for this and the T1–T2 contrasts. The learners’ advantage was observed across various phonetic contexts (initial consonants and tone bearing vowels), suggesting that their tone perception was more stable and resistant to speaker variation. In regard to speaker gender, both Japanese groups perceived the T2–T3 contrast more poorly, and T1–T2 and T1–T4 contrasts more successfully, when produced by female speakers.
Keywords: perception, lexical tones, Japanese, Mandarin
Published online: 23 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.2.05tsu
References (50)
Adi-Bensaid, L., & Most, T. (2012). The effect of speaker’s gender and number of syllables on the perception of words by young children: A developmental study. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(3-4), 17–24.Google Scholar
Best, C.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 171–203). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A.R., Torretta, G.M., & Pisoni, D.B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20(3-4), 255–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnham, D., Kasisopa, B., Reid, A., Luksaneeyanawin, S., Lacerda, F., Attina, V., Xu Rattanasone, N., Schwarz, I.-C., & Webster, D. (2015). Universality and language-specific experience in the perception of lexical tone and pitch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(6), 1459–1491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, G.T. (1974). The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Chinese Linguisitics, 21, 159–171.Google Scholar
Chuang, C.K., Hiki, S., Sone, T., & Nimura, T. (1975). Acoustical features of the four tones in monosyllabic utterances of standard Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 31(6), 369–380.Google Scholar
Ding, H., Jokisch, O., & Hoffmann, R. (2010). Perception and production of Mandarin tones by German speakers. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody (Speech Prosody 2010) , 1001531, 1–4.
Ding, H., Hoffmann, R., & Jokisch, O. (2011). An investigation of tone perception and production in German learners of Mandarin. Archives of Acoustics, 36(3), 509–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
. (2003a). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003b). Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In E. Fava & A. Mioni (Eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics (pp. 3–28). Padova: UniPress.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R.A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gårding, E., Kratochvil, P., Svantesson, J.-O., & Zhang, J. (1986). Tone 3 and tone 4 discrimination in modern standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 29(3), 281–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallé, P., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C.T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32(3), 395–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hao, Y.-C. (2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 269–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiki, S., Imaizumi, K., Sunaoka, K., & Yang, L. (2004). Teaching tonal discrimination based on statistical properties and acoustical characteristics of the Chinese four tones: With regard to the contrast between tone-2 and tone-3. Proceedings of the IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning , 53–62.
Huang, T., & Johnson, K. (2010). Language specificity in speech perception: Perception of Mandarin tones by native and non-native listeners. Phonetica, 67(4), 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiriloff, C. (1969). On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin. Phonetica, 20(2-4), 63–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuang, J. (2013). The tonal space of contrastive five level tones. Phonetica, 70(1-2), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D.A., & Wurm, L.H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(5), 527–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. (2009). Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 1138–1152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, W.C.J. (1985). Teaching Mandarin tones to adult English speakers: Analysis of difficulties with suggested remedies. RELC Journal, 16(2), 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markham, D., & Hazan, V. (2004). The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47(4), 725–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miracle, W.C. (1989). Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24(3), 49–65.Google Scholar
Reid, A., Burnham, D., Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R., Attina, V., Xu Rattanasone, N., & Best, C.T. (2015). Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: The roles of language experience and visual information. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 771, 571–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, X.S. (1989). Towards a register approach to teaching Mandarin tones. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 241, 27–47.Google Scholar
Shen, X.S., & Lin, M. (1991). A perceptual study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech, 34(2), 145–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. (1997). User manual for UAB software. University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J.G., Levy-Berger, G., & Haydon, M. (1985). Human experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
So, C.K. (2010). Categorizing Mandarin tones into Japanese pitch-accent categories: The role of phonetic properties. Proceedings of the Second Language Studies – Acquisition, Learning , Education and Technology.
So, C.K., & Best, C.T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Categorizing Mandarin tones into listeners’ native prosodic categories: The role of phonetic properties. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 133–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 361, 195–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., Bohn, O.-S., Trent, S.A., & Nishi, K. (2004). Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1791–1807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., Levy, E.S., & Law, F.L. (2009). Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naïve American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1461–1476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V.L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In J.G. Hansen Edwards & M.L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunaoka, K., Sun, Q., & Hiki, S. (2009). Corpus-based Chinese language education: Development and assessment of Chinese tone discrimination CAI self-learning system based on learner corpus. Journal of Liberal Arts (The School of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University), 1261, 79–98.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K., Xu, H.L., & Xu Rattanasone, N. (2015). The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by listeners from different linguistic backgrounds. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 4(2), 141–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tu, J.-Y., Hsiung, Y., Wu, M.-D., & Sung, Y.-T. (2014). Error patterns of Mandarin disyllabic tones by Japanese learners. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2014) , 2558–2562.
Wang, X. (2013). Perception of Mandarin tones: The effect of L1 background and training. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 144–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M.M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J.A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naïve and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 113–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R., & Susan, G.G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, P. (2013). Perceptual evidence for protracted development in monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone production in preschool children in Taiwan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 3649–3658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, P., Schwartz, R.G., & Jenkins, J.J. (2005). Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1065–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, P.C.M., & Perrachione, T.K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 565–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., Munro, M.J., & Wang, Y. (2014). Tone assimilation by Mandarin and Thai listeners with and without L2 experience. Journal of Phonetics, 461, 86–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, K.M., & Lam, H.W. (2011). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2011) , 2240–2243.
. (2014). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1320–1333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, S., Wong, L.L.N., & Chen, F. (2014). Tone identification in Mandarin-speaking children with profound hearing impairment. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 781, 2292–2296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Bao, Wenfu, Anja Arnhold & Juhani Järvikivi
2024. Phonology, homophony, and eyes-closed rest in Mandarin novel word learning: An eye-tracking study in adult native and non-native speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 45:1 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Kalaivanan, Kastoori
2024. Lexical tone perception and learning in older adults: A review and future directions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 77:10 ► pp. 2023 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Keke, Jie Zhang, Zilong Li, Xuliang Zhang, Hanhan Cai, Li Li & Ruiming Wang
2024. Production rather than observation: comparison between the roles of embodiment and conceptual metaphor in L2 lexical tone learning. Learning and Instruction 92 ► pp. 101905 ff. DOI logo
Tsukada, Kimiko & Kaori Idemaru
2022. Effects of First Language Background and Learning Experience in Perceiving Mandarin Lexical Tones: Learners and Nonlearners From English- and Japanese-Speaking Backgrounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:2 ► pp. 829 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Min, Xiaoxiang Chen & Yuxiao Yang
2021. The effects of native prosodic system and segmental context on Cantonese tone perception by Mandarin and Japanese listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149:6 ► pp. 4214 ff. DOI logo
Tsukada, Kimiko
2019. Are Asian Language Speakers Similar or Different? The Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones by Naïve Listeners from Tonal Language Backgrounds: A Preliminary Comparison of Thai and Vietnamese Listeners. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Tsukada, Kimiko & Jeong-Im Han
2019. The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Korean speakers differing in their experience with Mandarin. Second Language Research 35:3 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Tsukada, Kimiko & Mariko Kondo
2019. The Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones by Native Speakers of Burmese. Language and Speech 62:4 ► pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
康, 宇
2017. Effects of Tone Language Experience on Second Language Tone Acquisition. Modern Linguistics 05:03 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.