Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 6:1 (2023) ► pp.119–145

Speech competence and speech performance

A dual approach to understanding Chinese-as-a-second-language learners’ speech production ability

 | Zhejiang University, China
 | University of Auckland, New Zealand
This study examined Chinese-as-a-second-language (L2 Chinese) learners’ speech production ability from a dual perspective: speech competence and speech performance. A total of 118 valid L2 Chinese learners finished two developed tests in this study, namely, the Chinese speech competence test and the Chinese speech performance test. The results suggested that L2 Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance, as a twofold rendering of their L2 speech production ability, not only showed a significant positive correlation with a large effect size (Pearson’s r = .598) but also significantly predicted each other with a large effect size (Cohen f2  = .555). However, such large effect sizes of the correlation and the prediction between speech competence and speech performance were not supported among the upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners. This suggested that the development between speech competence and speech performance may be more unbalanced among the upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners compared with their advanced counterparts. The study adds evidence to the call for a multidimensional evaluation of L2 speech production ability. It is hoped that the dual approach (i.e., speech competence and speech performance) proposed in the present study may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of learners’ L2 Chinese speech production ability. Consequently, classroom-based teaching can be tailored to facilitate a more balanced development of L2 Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance.
Keywords: Speech competence, speech performance, L2 Chinese speech production ability, evaluation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Defining speech production ability
    • 2.2Speech competence and speech performance conceptualization
    • 2.3L2 speech production assessment
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instruments Development
      • Chinese speech competence test
      • Chinese speech performance test
      • L2 Chinese speech performance scale
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Data Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1General relationship and predictability between speech competence and speech performance
    • 4.2Relationship and predictability for speech competence groups
    • 4.3Relationship and predictability for speech performance groups
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • 6.Limitations and future research
  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests
  • References
Published online: 18 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22002.jun
References (57)
References
American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). The ACTFL proficiency guidelines: Speaking. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. W. (2016). Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (4), 647–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2016). Cambridge ESOL common scale for speaking. [URL]
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Language and communication. (pp. 2–27). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. L. D. (1979). Direct versus semi-direct tests of speaking proficiency. In E. J. Briere & F. B. Hinofotis (Ed.), Concepts in language testing: Some recent studies (pp. 35–49). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: Philosophy Library.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J., Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2008). Effects of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning, 58 (4), 911–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical language testing. London, UK: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
(2018). Assessing spoken production. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginther, A. (2013). Assessment of speaking. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–7). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hanban. (2016). Hanyu shuiping kouyu kaoshi (Chinese speaking proficiency test). in [URL]
Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R., & Reed, B. S. (2017). Teaching and researching speaking (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Jin, T., & Mak, B. (2013). Distinguishing features in scoring L2 Chinese speaking performance: How do they work?. Language Testing, 30 (1), 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., & Pickering, L. (2013). Acoustic and temporal analysis for assessing speaking. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1047–1062). Oxford, UK: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., Aubrey, S., & Leeming, P. (2021). Task preparation and second language speech production. TESOL Quarterly, 55 (2), 331–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, K. R., & Shea, C. E. (2017). L2 speaking development during study abroad: Fluency, accuracy, complexity, and underlying cognitive factors. Modern Language Journal, 101 (1), 179–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Ed.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, X., & Li, J. (2014). 汉语口语考试(SCT)的效度分析 [Validity analysis of spoken Chinese test]. 世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World], 28 (1), 103–112.Google Scholar
Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ma, X., Gong, Y., Gao, X., & Xiang, Y. (2017). The teaching of Chinese as a second or foreign language: A systematic review of the literature 2005–2015. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38 (9), 815–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahmoodzadeh, M. (2012). Investigating foreign language speaking anxiety within the EFL learner’s interlanguage system: The case of Iranian learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3 (3), 466–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, B. (2011). An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL learners. System, 39 (2), 202–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. F., & Röver, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mouzaki, A., Spyropoulou, E., Ralli, A., Antoniou, F., Diamanti, V., & Papaioannou, S. (2020). The dimensionality of oral language ability: Evidence from young Greek children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63 (8), 2732–2751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, M., & Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2021). Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities. Language Teaching, 54 (1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, D. D. (2009). Comparing direct and semi-direct modes for speaking assessment: Affective effects on test takers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6 (2), 113–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Röver, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based assessment battery. New York, NY: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runnqvist, E., Gollan, T. H., Costa, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2013). A disadvantage in bilingual sentence production modulated by syntactic frequency and similarity across languages. Cognition, 129 (2), 256–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37 (2), 217–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sardegna, V. G., Lee, J., & Kusey, C. (2018). Self-Efficacy, attitudes, and choice of strategies for English pronunciation learning. Language Learning, 68 (1), 83–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schissel, J. L. (2018). Test impact and washback. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, P. P. (2020). Chinese as a second language multilinguals’ speech competence and speech performance: Cognitive, affective, and socioculrual perspectives. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). The influence of cognitive, affective, and sociocultural individual differences on L2 Chinese speech performance: A multiple indicators multiple causes approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, P. P., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). A multidimensional perspective on individual differences in multilingual learners’ L2 Chinese speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (59), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D. J. (2002). Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: Standards, philosophies, and considerations for assessment. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers (pp. 9–48). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41 (2), 363–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchihara, T., & Saito, K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The Language Learning Journal, 47(1), 64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12 (1), 54–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. (2013). 对外汉语口语成绩测试形式试探 [On the forms of the proficiency test of L2 Chinese speaking]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版) [Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition)], S11, 106–109.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2020). Effects of task type on L2 Mandarin fluency development. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(2), 157-179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., & Zhao, X. (2020). 初中级汉语水平二语者口语产出质量评估研究 [On the quality assessment of spoken Chinese for low-intermediate level L2 learners]. 语言文字应用 [Applied Linguistics], 11, 76–86.Google Scholar
Xu, J. (2018). Measuring “spoken collocational competence” in communicative speaking assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15 (3), 255–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yan, Q. Z., Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. L. (2021). Implementing classroom-based assessment for young EFL learners in the Chinese context: A case study. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 30 1, 541–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Zhang, L. J., & Wilson, A. J. (2021). Supporting learner success: Revisiting strategic competence through developing an inventory for computer-assisted speaking assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 1, 6895811, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y., & Gao, A. X. (2016). Chinese humanities and social sciences scholars’ language choices in international scholarly publishing: A ten-year survey. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 48 (1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Sun, Peijian Paul, Jiayi Zhang & Xian Zhao
2024. Modeling speaking performance in young learners of Chinese as a heritage language: The interplay of L2 grit, motivational intensity, and willingness to communicate. System 126 ► pp. 103490 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Lilong & Boping Yuan
2024. What looks native-like may not necessarily be native-like. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:6 ► pp. 856 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Cong, Yiwen Meng & Xinyu Ma
2024. Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System 121 ► pp. 103259 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Jianhua & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2024. Examining L2 studentsʼ development of global cohesion and its relationship with their argumentative essay quality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Zhang, Weiwei, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Aaron J. Wilson
2024. Strategic competence, task complexity, and foreign language learners’ speaking performance: a hierarchical linear modelling approach. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 1121 ff. DOI logo
Li, Cha & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2023. The Development of Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language (L2) Speaking Related to Self-Efficacy Through Online Scaffolding: A Latent Growth Curve Modeling Analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:5 ► pp. 1371 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.