Cover not available
Article published In:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (2014) ► pp.1–17

The extrinsic plural marker in Korean

Five studies

| University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, USA
This paper presents a series of experiments designed to shed light on some aspects of the use and interpretation of so-called ‘extrinsic -tul’ by child and adult native speakers of Korean. Our findings indicate that this morpheme occurs far less frequently than the intrinsic plural marker in both speech and writing, and that it is most likely to appear on an adverb. An experiment designed to confirm its oft-claimed status as a distributive marker reveals that whereas adults systematically interpret it in this way, children under the age of 8 rarely do, even when appropriate contextual support is provided.
Keywords: extrinsic plural marker, distributivity
Published online: 7 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.16.1.01kim
References (21)
An, Young-Ran. 2007. Korean -tul and English all. Linguistics Student Organization Working papers in Linguistics 71: 1–16.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen, & Cecile McKee. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 151: 94–110. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Crain, Stephen, & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kang, Beom-Mo. 1994. Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiaer, Jieun. 2010. On the meaning and distribution of TUL in Korean: Evidence from Corpora. Language Research 461: 257–271.Google Scholar
Kim, Chonghyuck. 2005. The Korean Plural Marker -tul and its Implications. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Kim, Yookyung. 1994. A non-spurious account of ‘spurious’ Korean plurals. Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics ed. by Young-Key Kim-Renaud, 303–323. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Kuh, Hakan. 1987. Plural copying in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 21: 39–50.Google Scholar
Kwon, Song-Nim & Anne Zribi-Hertz. 2004. Number from a syntactic perspective: Why plural-marking looks ‘truer’ in French than in Korean. Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 51: 133–158.Google Scholar
Lardiere, Donna. 2009. Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 251: 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Han-Gyu. 1991. Plural marker copying in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 41: 513–528.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel. 1992. A Reference Grammar of Korean: A Complete Guide to the Grammar and History of the Korean Language. Clarendon, VT: Charles Tuttle & Co.Google Scholar
Nakano, Nao, Hye Sun Park, & Cristina Schmitt. 2009. A Comparative Study on the Acquisition of Plural Morphemes in Japanese and Korean. Paper presented at the Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics.
Park, So-Young. 2008. Plural marking in classifier languages: A case study of the so-called plural marking -tul in Korean. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 281: 281–295.Google Scholar
Roberts, Maxwell J., David J. Wood, & David J. Gilmore. 1994. The sentence-picture verification task: Methodological and theoretical difficulties. British Journal of Psychology 851: 413–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae-Jung. 1997. The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of Pragmatics 271: 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Seok-Choong. 1975. Rare plural marking and ubiquitous plural marker in Korean. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics society 111: 536–546.
Suh, Eugenia. 2008. The usage and interpretation of Korean -tul plural by heritage language speakers. Proceedings of the Second Language Research Forum ed. by Melissa Bowles, Rebecca Foote, Silvia Perpiñán, & Rakesh Bhatt, 239–251. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Unterbeck, Barbara. 1996. The unorthodox category of number in Korean. Paper presented at the International Association for Korean Language Education Conference, Seoul, Korea. Yim, Changguk. 2002. The morphology of event plurality in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 91: 669–682.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Ahn, Dorothy & Jesse Snedeker
2022. Early Acquisition of Plural Morphology in a Classifier Language: Data from Korean 2-4 Year Olds. Language Learning and Development 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
김소영
2018. The Study on Korean Native Speakers’ Understanding of Plural Copying -Revisiting Extrinsic Plural Marker on Verbs. Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
김소영
2018. The Korean Native Speakers’ Production on the Korean Plural Marking Constrained by Animacy and Numerals. Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences 19:4 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Chae-Eun, William O’Grady, Kamil Deen & Kitaek Kim
2017. Syntactic fast mapping: The Korean Extrinsic Plural Marker. Language Acquisition 24:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Ud Deen, Kamil
2017. The Acquisition of Morphology. In The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.