Cover not available
Part of
The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 89–108

Complementizers and negative polarity in German hypothetical comparatives

 | University of Potsdam
The article examines the synchronic and diachronic relation between German hypothetical comparatives and ordinary comparatives. While the presence of an overt equative complementizer is not universally obligatory, it is so in hypothetical comparatives, whereas a conditional complementizer may be absent. This is because the equative complementizer in hypothetical comparatives functions as the licenser of the conditional clause in monoclausal hypothetical comparatives, and in this sense, it is a polarity marker. This difference regarding function accounts for the fact that German allows als in hypothetical comparatives but not in equatives: while the combinations als ob and als wenn historically derive from biclausal constructions, the reanalysis into monoclausal constructions allowed the fossilization of a complementizer without reference to changes affecting ordinary equatives.
Keywords: complementizer, conditional clause, equatives, hypothetical comparatives, reanalysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The typology of hypothetical comparatives
  • 3.Operators and polarity
  • 4.Syntax and grammaticalization
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.03bac
References (51)
References
Arsenijević, Boban. 2009. Correlatives as types of conditional. In Correlatives Cross-linguistically [Language Faculty and Beyond 1], Anikó Lipták (ed.), 131–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014. The Syntax of Comparative Constructions: Operators, Ellipsis Phenomena and Functional Left Peripheries. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Degree semantics, polarity, and the grammaticalisation of comparative operators into complementisers. Paper presented at the 17th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference (DiGS17), Reykjavík, University of Iceland, 29–31 May.<[URL]> (19 September 2016).
. 2015b. German dialects and an anti-cartographic approach to the CP-domain. Paper presented at: SaRDiS 2015: Saarbrücker Runder Tisch für Dialektsyntax, Saarbrücken, Universität des Saarlandes, 6–7 November. <[URL]> (19 September 2016).
. 2016a. Equative elements in comparative constructions and in relative clauses in the history of German and English. Paper presented at: Equative Constructions, Cologne, Universität zu Köln, 15 December. <[URL]> (31 March 2017).
. 2016b. Towards a cross-linguistic typology of marking polarity in embedded degree clauses. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63(4): 389–409.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016c. Variation in the grammaticalisation of polar operators in West Germanic. Paper presented at Potsdam Summer School in Historical Linguistics 2016. Word Order Variation and Change. Diachronic Insights into Germanic Diversity, Potsdam, Universität Potsdam, 7–9 July. <[URL]> (30 September 2016).
Behaghel, Otto. 1928. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band 3: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Pancheva, Roumyana. 2006. Conditionals. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. I, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 638–687. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2017. Parameter setting. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 134–162. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4 (3): 275–343.Google Scholar
Chen, Guohua. 2000. The grammaticalization of concessive markers in Early Modern English. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 85–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On WH-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven & Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Conditional clauses, main clause phenomena and the syntax of polarity emphasis. In Comparative Germanic Syntax: The State of the Art [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 191], Peter Ackema, Rhona Alcorn, Caroline Heycock, Dany Jaspers, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd (eds), 133–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (14 May 2015).
Dückert, Joachim. 1961. Das geschichtliche Verhältnis des vergleichenden ‘als’ und ‘wie’. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 83: 205–230.Google Scholar
Duden-Grammatik. 2009. Die Grammatik, 8th edn. Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eggs, Frederike. 2006. Die Grammatik von ‘als’ und ‘wie’. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ferrell, James. 1968. On some conditional clause indicators in Slavic and Germanic languages. WORD 24(1–3): 99–111.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franz, Wilhelm. 1939. Die Sprache Shakespeares in Vers und Prosa. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. University of Texas. <[URL]> (30 March 2017).
. 2000. Degree operators and scope. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 10: 40–64.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohaus, Vera & Zimmermann, Malte. 2014. Equatives outside the domain of degree constructions. Paper presented at Linguistic Evidence 2014, Tübingen, 13–15 February.
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1995. A DP-shell for comparatives. In Console III Proceedings, Antonietta Bisetti (ed.), 99–121. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln. Linguistische Berichte 224: 467–493.Google Scholar
. 2016. Vergleichskonstruktionen im Deutschen: Diachroner Wandel und synchrone Variation. Habilitationsschrift, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1990. Old French and comparative Gallo-Romance syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Gerhard. 1973. Zu den durch ‘als’ , ‘als ob’, ‘wie wenn’, ‘als wenn’ eingeleiteten ‘Komparativsätzen’. Zielsprache Deutsch 4: 91–111.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2002. Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(3): 553–621.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Merchant, Jason. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(1): 89–146.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klooster, Willem Gerrit. 2001. Grammatica van het hedendaags Nederlands: Een volledig overzicht. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1985. Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In Historical Semantics – Historical Word-formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 263–282. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3(2): 217–264.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014. On comparative complementizers in English: Evidence from historical corpora. In Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain, Nila Méndez-Naya Vazques (ed.), 311–333. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1920. Deutsche Grammatik IV. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. Alan. 1985. Comparative subordinating conjunctions in modern American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 23(4): 323–330.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1983. The reduction and elimination of redundancy. In Essays in Honor of Charles F. Hockett, Frederick B. Agard & Gerald Kelly (eds), 107–125. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1954. The Concessive Relation in Old English Poetry. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Elisabeth. 1996. Contrast: Adversative and Concessive Relations and Their Expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrodt, Richard. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatikw II. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter. 1973. The comparative. In Generative Grammar in Europe, Ferenc Kiefer & Nicholas Ruwet (eds), 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. 2002. The Comp-trace Effect, the Adverb Effect and minimal CP. Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 527–560.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarriño, Eusebia. 2011. Comparative clauses. In Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology, Philip Baldi (ed.), 373–426. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. 2004. The subjunctive mood in German and in the Germanic languages. In Focus on Germanic Typology, Werner Abraham (ed.), 315–358. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria. 2001. Vergleiche und Vergleichen: Eine Studie zu Form und Funktion der Vergleichsstrukturen im Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3(1–2): 1–77.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott
2024. Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy, DOI logo
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
2020. German V2 and Doubly Filled COMP in West Germanic. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.