Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 1:2 (2011) ► pp.111–148

Subject/object asymmetries in the grammar of bilingual and monolingual Spanish speakers

Evidence against connectionism

| The University of Western Ontario
This paper argues against connectionist models of language acquisition. It examines knowledge of the properties of subjects and objects in Spanish, particularly in impersonal passives and inchoatives. In both of these structures, the reflexive clitic se is obligatorily present and the linear order of elements is the same, namely [se V NP], with agreement between the verb and the noun phrase. In other words, the input is identical in both cases (se quemaron los libros ‘the books burned/were burned’ is ambiguous between both structures). However, the NP in the impersonal passive exhibits some of the properties of objects while the NP in the inchoatives behaves exclusively like a subject. An empirical study shows that three groups of speakers of Spanish, a monolingual Spanish group, an early English/Spanish bilingual group and a group of late learners of Spanish, are aware of these differences. As the input is ambiguous, it is argued that a model such as that provided by connectionist theories, which argues that the input is sufficient for acquisition, cannot account for the data.
Keywords: nativism, connectionism, subjects, objects, inchoative constructions, impersonal constructions, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject/object asymmetries in Spanish and English
    • 2.1Flexible word order
    • 2.2Impersonal and inchoative constructions
  • 3.Theories of acquisition
  • 4.The experiment
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Tasks
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Oral interviews
    • 5.2Grammaticality judgment task
      • 5.2.1Overall results
      • 5.2.2Post verbal NPs
      • 5.2.3Subextraction
      • 5.2.4Secondary Predication
      • 5.2.5Differential object marking
      • 5.2.6Summary of distinctions
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 April 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.2.01bru
References (87)
References
Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 161, 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. W., Arrow, K. J. & Pines, D. (eds.). (1988). The economy as an evolving complex system. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J. (eds.). (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. & Abrahamsen A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (1982). ‘Morphological’ passive and pro-drop: the impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistic Research, 21, 1–33.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1996). Conservative pattern accumulation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at EUROSLA 6. Nijmegen.Google Scholar
. (1997). Features and patterns of foreign language learning. Paper presented at SLRF. Michigan State University.Google Scholar
. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 175–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, J., Bruhn-Garavito, J. & Libert, A. (1995). Feature checking and Spanish se. In V. Samiian, and J. Schaeffer (eds.) Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 94) (pp. 1–15). University of California, Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, California State University.Google Scholar
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Wanner D. and Kibbee, D. A. (eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. & Montrul, S. (2009). Instructed L2 acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish.In R. Leow, H. Campos, and D. Lardiere (eds.), Little Words. Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics and Acquisition. (Georgetown University Roundtable). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1999). The SE constructions in Spanish and near-native competence. Spanish Applied Linguistics 31, 247–295.Google Scholar
. (2000). The syntax of Spanish multifunctional clitics and near-native competence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
. (2002a). Verb raising in Spanish: a comparison of early and late bilinguals. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish and A. Do (eds.), BUCLD 26 Proceedings (pp. 84–94). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. (2002b). La position syntaxique du thème des verbes psychologiques datifs. Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique 311, 137–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, K., Byrnes, H. & Thomson, I. (1989). The ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. New York: The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian Syntax: A Government Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
. (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1988). On si constructions and the theory of Arb . Linguistic Inquiry, 191, 521–581.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of UG to adult and child learners: a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 21, 93–119 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L. & Hulk, A. (1996). Ergative Reflexives in Heerlen Dutch and French. Studia Linguistica, 501, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2004). A Devil’s Chaplain. Reflections on Hope, Lies, science, and Love (pp. 78–90). Boston: Mariner Books (Houghton Mifflin Company).Google Scholar
De Landa, M. (1994). Virtual Environments and the Emergence of Synthetic Reason. In M. Dery (ed.), Flame Wars: The Discourse of Cyberculture (pp. 263–286). Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Thyre, R. (2000). The interpretation of quantification at a distance in English-French interlanguage: Domain specificity and second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 81, 265–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrobie-Sorin, C. (1998). Impersonal se constructions in Romance and passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 291, 399–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L. (2009). Charting the Route of Bilingual Development: Contributions from Heritage Speaker’s Early Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 271–287 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, Connectionism and Language Learning. Language Learning, 481, 631–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002b). Reflections on Frequency Effects in Language Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 297–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and Connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59, Supplement 1, 93–128.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O. (1999). Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish: Locative and Dative Subjects. Syntax, 21, 101–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodall, G. (2001). The EPP in Spanish. In W. Davies, & S. Dubinsky, (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D. (eds.). (1981). Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982a). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. (1982b). Move Wh in a language without Wh movement. The Linguistic Review, 11, 369–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance Syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2004). Romance se as an aspectual element. In J. Auger, J.C. Clements & B. Vance (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 33rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 239–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, H. & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 851, 211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Y-K. I. (2007). L3 acquisition: Why it is interesting to generative linguists. Second Language Research, 231, 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, S. (1992). Artificial life: the quest for a new creation. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. M. (1984). En torno a las relaciones gramaticales en español. Ottawa Hispánica, 61, 29–31.Google Scholar
. (1997). The then and now of L2 rowing pains. In L. D.az Rodr.guez & C. P.rez Vidal (eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language (pp. 65–85). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1999). The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1993). Creoloid phenomena in the Spanish of transitional bilinguals. In J.M. Lipski (ed.), Spanish in the United States. Linguistic contact and diversity (pp. 155–182). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Models of the emergence of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 491, 199–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). The Emergence of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mallén, E. (1992). Subject topicalization and inflection in Spanish. Theoretical Linguistics, 181, 179–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1991). Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language learning: some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 231–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 131, 227–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea Pelayo, A. (1992). On the nature of agreement: the syntax of arb se in Spanish. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of York.
Montrul, S. (1997). Transitivity Alternations in Second Language Acquisition: A Crosslinguistic Study of English, Spanish and Turkish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 51, 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 71, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic Carpentry. An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1998). Post-verbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 161, 313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otero, C. (1986). Arbitrary subjects in finite clauses. In I. Bordelois, H. Contreras and K. Zagona (eds.), Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax (pp. 81–109). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paulson, W. R. (1988). The Noise of Culture: Literary Texts in a World of Information. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pires, A. & Rothman, J. (2009). Disentangling Contributing Variables to Incomplete Acquisition Competence Outcomes: What Differences Across Brazilian and European Portuguese Heritage Speakers Tell Us. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2) 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raposo, E. & Uriagereka, J. (1990). Object agreement in the impersonal se passive construction in European Portuguese. In K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell, & E., Mejías-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. (1996). Indefinite SE . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 141, 749–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2007). Heritage Speaker Competence Differences, Language Change and Input Type: Inflected Infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Why Not All Counter-Evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis Is Equal or Problematic: Implications for SLA. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(6), 1063–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 145–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. & Iverson, M. (2008). Poverty-of-the-stimulus and L2 Epistemology: Considering L2 Knowledge of Aspectual Phrasal Semantics. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 15(4) 270–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Iverson, M., & Judy, T. (2011). Some Notes on the Generative Study of L3 Acquisition. Second Language Research, 271, 5–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sanz, M. (2000). Events and Predication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 121, 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1997, March). Transfer: A tradition in transition. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. & Paoli, S. (2004). Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 71, 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corval.n, C. (1991). Spanish language attrition in a contact situation with English. H.W. Seliger & R. M. Vago (eds.), First Language Attrition (pp. 151–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. C. (2001). The Moment of Complexity. Emerging Network Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge: Mass, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, L. (1991). Inner aspect and the structure of VP. NELS XXII.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M., Sorace, A. Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F. (2005). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: a study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 81, 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 121, 238–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. T. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Ionin, Tania
2021. Acceptability Studies in L2 Populations. In The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax, ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Ian Cunnings & Jorge González Alonso
2019. Formal Linguistic Approaches to Adult L2 Acquisition and Processing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Gómez Soler, Inmaculada
2015. Acquisitional patterns of Spanish anticausative se. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Nagano, Tomonori
2015.  Acquisition of English verb transitivity by native speakers of Japanese . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:3 ► pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
VanPatten, Bill & Jason Rothman
2015. What does current generative theory have to say about the explicit-implicit debate?. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 48], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Ionin, Tania & Eve Zyzik
2014. Judgment and Interpretation Tasks in Second Language Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason & Diego Pascual y Cabo
2013. Generative Approaches to Spanish Second Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Slabakova, Roumyana
2013. Adult second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:1 ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Slabakova, Roumyana
2018. Back to our roots. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:6 ► pp. 776 ff. DOI logo
SLABAKOVA, ROUMYANA
2019. “L” Stands for Language. The Modern Language Journal 103:S1 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.