Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 14:3 (2024) ► pp.285–309

Proficiency in a second language influences processing of print-to-sound mappings

ORCID logo | University of MissouriColumbiaMO
 | Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkPA
 | University of CaliforniaIrvineCA
A hallmark of word naming in deep orthographies, effects of spelling-sound regularity and consistency are considered to reach stability in adulthood. We investigated whether these effects were modulated by second language (L2) proficiency in native English and native Spanish speakers. Participants named English, Spanish and language-ambiguous words, but only the English words were used in the analysis. Participants in each group named English words with irregular-inconsistent mappings (e.g., PINT) more slowly and less accurately than words with regular-consistent mappings (e.g., GATE). Higher English proficiency reduced the magnitude of the regularity-consistency effect in both groups. Critically, native English speakers revealed a U-shaped relationship between L2-Spanish proficiency and the regularity-consistency effect on naming latencies. The current findings add to a growing body of literature that considers the boundaries within which L2 proficiency can influence native language (L1) performance. Results suggest that L2 proficiency may destabilize a fundamental aspect of L1 literacy, the computation of phonology from text, which is known as a highly stable psycholinguistic effect. This suggests that the language system is dynamic, remaining plastic in early adulthood.
Keywords: word naming, spelling-to-sound correspondences, second language proficiency, phonology
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Experiment 1
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Materials and procedure
        • Language history questionnaire
        • Word naming task
        • Reading measures
        • Picture naming task
      • Data analysis
    • Results and discussion
      • Summary of results
  • Experiment 2
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Materials and procedure
      • Data analysis
    • Results and discussion
      • Summary of results
  • General discussion
  • Conclusion
    • Limitations and future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 6 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21063.bot
References (75)
References
Ameel, E., Malt, B. C., Storms, G., & Van Assche, F. (2009). Semantic convergence in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 60 (2), 270–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10 1, 565–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Bojesen Christensen, R. H., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Grothendieck, G., & Green, P. (2016). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-11. [URL]. In [URL]
Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). On the effects of second language immersion on first language production. Acta Psychologica, 142 (3), 402–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (2019). English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain and Language, 196 1, 104644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Native language change during early stages of second language learning. Neuroreport, 26 (16), 966–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borodkin, K., & Faust, M. (2014). Native language phonological skills in low-proficiency second language learners. Language Learning, 64 (1), 132–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botezatu, M. R., Kroll, J. F., Trachsel, M., & Guo, T. (2022). Second language immersion impacts native language lexical production and comprehension. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 12 (3), 347–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botezatu, M. R., Miller, C. A., & Misra, M. (2015). An ERP study of visual rhyming effects in native and non-native English speakers. Neuroreport, 26 (3), 118–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botezatu, M. R., Peterson, S., & Garcia, D. (under review). Dynamics of within-language competition in visual and spoken word recognition: Evidence from heritage and classroom learners of Spanish.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. (2008). Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (2), 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K. (2010). Carpet or carcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25 (5), 669–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40 (2), 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41 (6), 520–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colomé, À., & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36 (1), 96–109.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100 (4), 589–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20 1, 1197–1211.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108 1, 204–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortese, M. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition, 28 (8), 1269–1276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degani, T., Prior, A., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Bidirectional transfer: The effect of sharing a translation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23 (1), 18–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54 (4), 610–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (01), 101–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J. (2012). Tracking tip-of-the-tongue states in a multilingual speaker: Evidence of attrition or instability in lexical systems? International Journal of Bilingualism, 17 (6), 734–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5 (4), 674–691.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L.-A. R. (2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 (1), 246–269.Google Scholar
Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition, 106 (1), 501–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2007). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127 (2), 277–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46 1, 723–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (1), 2–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4 1, 103–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasparian, K., Vespignani, F., & Steinhauer, K. (2016). First language attrition induces changes in online morphosyntactic processing and re-analysis: An ERP study of number agreement in complex Italian sentences. Cognitive Science, 41 (7), 1760–1803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9 1, 157–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M. (2012). Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism, 15 (3), 470–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, J., & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 449–469). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bice, K., Botezatu, M. R., & Zirnstein, M. (2022). On the dynamics of lexical access in two or more languages. In L. Gleitman, A. Papafragou, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Handbook of the Mental Lexicon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Hoshino, N. (2014). Two languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to Iinvestigate language, cognition, and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23 (3), 159–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Gollan, T. H. (2014). Speech planning in two languages: What bilinguals tell us about language production. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Production. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18 (2), 137–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacruz, I., & Folk, J. R. (2004). Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high-and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57A 1, 1261–1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2011). Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37 (4), 952–965. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H. (2008). Cross-language effects of grammatical gender in bilingual word recognition and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (3), 312–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20 (12), 1507–1515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2004). Mapping written input onto orthographic representations: The case of bilinguals with partially overlapping orthographies. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6 (2), 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martensen, H., Maris, E., & Dijkstra, T. (2000). When does inconsistency hurt? On the relation between phonological consistency effects and the reliability of sublexical units. Memory and Cognition, 28 1, 648–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nat Neurosci, 7 (7), 703–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F., Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., Iglesias, A., Fabiano, L., & Francis, D. J. (2006). Oral language and reading in bilingual children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21 1, 30–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nosarti, C., Mechelli, A., Green, D. W., & Price, C. J. (2010). The impact of second language learning on semantic and nonsemantic first language reading. Cerebral Cortex, 20 (2), 315–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (12), 2728–2744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peereman, R. (1995). Naming regular and exception words: Further examination of the effect of phonological dissension among lexical neighbours. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7 (3), 307–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103 (1), 56–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Psychology Software Tools Incorporated. (2012). E-Prime. In [URL]
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F., & Diaz, M. (2007). Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22 (1), 106–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96 1, 523–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In E. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-Word Reading: Behavioral and Biological Perspectives (pp. 1–24). Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94 1, 143–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55 (2), 151–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, J.-A., & Christianson, K. (2009). Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 112 (1), 175–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10 (3), 281–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & Bauer, D. W. (1978). Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 6 (4), 410–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, M., Dierks, T., Brandeis, D., Wirth, M., Strik, W., & Koenig, T. (2006). Plasticity in the adult language system: A longitudinal electrophysiological study on second language learning. Neuroimage, 33 (2), 774–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tice, M., & Woodley, M. (2012). Paguettes & Bastries: Novice French Learners Show Shifts in Native Phoneme. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Reports, (pp. 72–75). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9 (4), 780–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leerdam, M., Bosman, A. M., & de Groot, A. M. (2009). When MOOD rhymes with ROAD: Dynamics of phonological coding in bilingual visual word perception. The Mental Lexicon, 4 (3), 303–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 12 1, 293–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weekes, B. S., Castles, A. E., & Davies, R. A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19 1, 133–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yum, Y. N., Law, S., Su, I., Lau, K., An, E. R. P., & Mo, K. N. (2014). An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 1, 315–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131 (1), 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12 (5), 379–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (4), 1131–1161.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Coretta, Stefano & Joseph V. Casillas
2024. A tutorial on generalised additive mixed effects models for bilingualism research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Lecerf, Marie-Ange, Séverine Casalis & Eva Commissaire
2024. New insights into bilingual visual word recognition: State of the art on the role of orthographic markedness, its theoretical implications, and future research directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 31:3 ► pp. 1032 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.