This study characterized focused tones in Mandarin Chinese through a production experiment using phone number
strings. The results revealed that, although phonation cues had little effect on any focused tone, prosodic cues exhibited various
patterns of distribution. Duration played an important role for each focused tone, but intensity had a relatively less salient
role. Among pitch-related parameters, the raising of pitch register was an important cue when a level tone (tone 1) was focused. By
contrast, due to the interaction between tone and intonation, absolute slope and pitch range had less effect on tone 1 focus.
These cues, however, were prominent when contour tones (tones 2 and 4) were in focus. Unlike other focused tones that raised
pitch, tone 3 focus exhibited the opposite pattern, lowering its pitch target. In the aggregation of all focused tones, it was
found that only primarily pitch-related parameters were selected as the main variables discriminating one from another. The
results of this study, therefore, suggest that the prosodic marking of focus is not uniform, even within a single language, but
clearly differs by tone type. Accordingly, prosodic marking of focus should be considered multimodal in a tonal language.
Berinstein, Ava E.1979. A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 471. 1–59.
Cao, Wen & Zhang, Jinsong. 2008. Tone-3 accent realization in short Chinese sentences. Tsinghua Science and Technology 13(4). 533–539.
Cao, Jianfen. 2002. Hanyu shengdiao yu yudiao de guanxi [The relationship between tone and intonation in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2002(3). 195–202.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chen, Yiya & Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2008. Emphasis and tonal implementation in standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36(4). 724–746.
Cooper, William E. & Eady, Stephen J. & Mueller, Pamela R.1985. Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77(6). 2142–2156.
Gårding, Eva & Zhang, Jialu & Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1983. A generative model for tone and intonation in standard Chinese. In Gösta, Bruce & Gårding, Eva (eds.), Working papers in linguistics, vol. 251, 53–65. Lund: Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2008. Types of focus in English. In Lee, Chungmin & Gordon, Matthew & Büring, Daniel (eds.), Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation, vol. 821, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.
Keating, Patricia & Garellek, Marc & Kreiman, Jody. 2015. Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-21.)
Kuznetsova, Alexandra & Brockhoff, Per Bruun & Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen. 2013. lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R Package (Version 1.2–0, 20March 2013.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-31.)
Ladd, D. Robert. 1984. English compound stress. In Gibbon, Dafydd & Richter, Helmut (eds.), Intonation, accent, and rhythm: Studies in discourse phonology, 253–266. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lee, Albert & Xu, Yi. 2012. Revisiting focus prosody in Japanese. In Ma, Qiuwu & Ding, Hongwei & Hirst, Daniel (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2012, 274–277. ISCA Archive. (The 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Shanghai, 22–25May 2012.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-09-16.)
Lee, Yong-cheol. 2015. Prosodic focus within and across languages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lee, Yong-cheol. 2017. Prosodic focus in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean. Linguistic Research 34(1). 133–161.
Lee, Yong-cheol & Wang, Bei & Chen, Sisi & Adda-Decker, Martine & Amelot, Angélique & Nambu, Satoshi & Liberman, Mark. 2015. A crosslinguistic study of prosodic focus. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2015), 4754–4758. New York: IEEE ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-21.)
Lee, Yong-cheol & Nambu, Satoshi & Cho, Sunghye. 2018. Focus prosody of telephone numbers in Tokyo Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143(5). EL340–EL346.
Lee, Yong-cheol & Wang, Ting & Liberman, Mark. 2016. Production and perception of tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 71. 1-13 (Article no. 1058). ([URL] (Accessed 2020-02-07.)
Lee, Yong-cheol & Xu, Yi. 2010. Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010 (Paper 033). ISCA Archive. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-21.)
Liaw, Andy & Wiener, Matthew. 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, vol. 2/31, 18–22. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-31.)
Ma, Qiuwu. 2017. The focus accents in Chinese intonation: Prosodic implementation and types. In Feng, Shengli (ed.), Studies in prosodic grammar 2017, vol. 21, 32–72. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
Ouyang, Iris Chuoying & Kaiser, Elsi. 2015. Prosody and information structure in a tone language: An investigation of Mandarin Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(1–2). 57–72.
Potisuk, Siripong & Gandour, Jackson & Harper, Mary P.1997. Contextual variations in trisyllabic sequences of Thai tones. Phonetica 54(1). 22–42.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-21.)
Shen, Jiong. 1985. Beijinghua shengdiao de yinyu he yudiao [Pitch range of tone and intonation in Beijing dialect]. In Lin, T. & Wang, L. (eds.), Beijing yuyin shiyanlu [Working papers in experimental phonetics], 73–130. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Shih, Chilin. 1988. Tone and intonation in Mandarin. Working Papers of Cornell Phonetics Laboratory (WPCPL) 31. 83–109.
Wang, Ting. 2015. Shengdiao yuyan de qinggan yuyin shiyan yanjiu [An experimental study of emotional speech in tonal languages]. Shanghai: Tongji University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Wang, Ting & Lee, Yong-cheol. 2015. Does restriction of pitch variation affect the perception of vocal emotions in Mandarin Chinese?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137(1). EL117–EL123.
Wu, Zongji. 2001. Putonghua yuyin hecheng zhong youguan zirandu de yunlv bianliang wenti [Naturalness of prosodic parameters in the speech synthesis of Mandarin]. In Tsai, Lian-hong & Zhou, Tong-chun & Tao, Jian-hua (eds.), Xinshiji de xiandai yuyinxue: Di wu jie quanguo xiandai yuyinxue xueshuhuiyi lunwenji [Modern phonetics of the new century: Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Modern Phonetics], 299–302. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Xu, Yi. 1997. Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics 25(1). 61–83.
Xu, Yi. 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27(1). 55–105.
Xu, Yi. 2004. Understanding tone from the perspective of production and perception. Language and Linguistics 5(4). 757–797.
Xu, Yi. 2005. Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication 46(3–4). 220–251.
Xu, Yi. 2013. ProsodyPro – A Tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Bigi, Brigitte & Hirst, Daniel (eds.), Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), 7–10. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
Xu, Yi & Xu, Ching X.2005. Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics 33(2). 159–197.
Xu, Yi & Wang, Maolin. 2009. Organizing syllables into groups – Evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics 37(4). 502–520.
Xu, Yi & Wang, Q. Emily. 2001. Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication 33(4). 319–337.
Xu, Yi & Chen, Szu-wei & Wang, Bei. 2012. Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression: A typological divide within the same language family?The Linguistic Review 29(1). 131–147.
Yin, Jide & Kong, Jiangping. 2010. Putonghua yuju zhongyin de sangyin fasheng biaoxian yanjiu [The phonation characteristics of sentence focus in Mandarin]. Proceedings of the 9th Phonetic Conference of China, 35–44. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-22.)
Zheng, Xiaoju. 2006. Voice quality variation with tone and focus in Mandarin. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2006), 132–136. ISCA Archive. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-10-22.)
Zhu, Yinyin. 2013. Expression and recognition of emotion in native and foreign speech: The case of Mandarin and Dutch (LOT Dissertation Series 341). Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Zhang, Wei, Meghan Clayards & Michael Wagner
2024. Prosodic Effects of Focus and Constituency in Mandarin and in English. Laboratory Phonology
Zhao, Xinxian & Xiaohu Yang
2024. Aging affects auditory contributions to focus perception in Jianghuai Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155:5 ► pp. 2990 ff.
Zhang, Wei & Meghan Clayards
2023. Contribution of acoustic cues to prominence ratings for four Mandarin vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 154:5 ► pp. 3364 ff.
Zhang, Wei, Meghan Clayards & Francisco Torreira
2023. Phonological mediation effects in imitation of the Mandarin flat-falling tonal continua. Journal of Phonetics 101 ► pp. 101277 ff.
2021. 2021 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP), ► pp. 67 ff.
Zhang, Wei, Meghan Clayards & Jinsong Zhang
2021. 2021 12th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP), ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.