Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.234260
Antaki Charles, Rebecca Barnes, and Ivan Leudar
2005“Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 7 (6): 627–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles
2008“Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuss, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
2009“Meeting Talk. An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio
Baraldi, Claudio.
2012a>“Participation, Facilitation and Mediation in Educational Interactions.” In Participation, Facilitation, and Mediation. Children and Young People in their Social Contexts, ed. by Claudio Baraldi and Vittorio Iervese, 66–86. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio
2012b“The Function of Formulations in Polyphonic Dialogue.” In Spces of Polyphony, ed. by Ubaldina Lorda and Peter Zabalbeascoa, 73–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio, and Federico Farini
2011“Dialogic Mediation in International Groups of Adolescents.” Language and Dialogue 1(2): 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Rebecca
2007“Formulation and the Facilitation of Agreement in Meetings Talk.” Text & Talk 27 (3): 273–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne, and C.N. Dixson
2001“Revealing Moments: Formulating Understandings of Adverse Experiences in a Health Appraisal Interview.” Social Science and Medicine 521: 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2010“Articulating the Unsaid via And-Prefaced Formulations of Other’s Talk.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Jonathan
2006“A Conversation Analytical Approach to Business Communication. The Case of Leadership.” Journal of Business Communication 43 (3): 202–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009“Beyond Taxonomies of Influence. ‘Doing’ Influence and Making Decisions in Management Team Meetings.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 57–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppelmann, Arnulf
2011“Notionalization: The Transformation of Descriptions in Categorizations.” Human Studies 341: 155–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2003“Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, J. Mandelbaum, 293–308. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Britten, Nancy
2004“Formulation in General Practice Consultation.” Text 24 (2): 147–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Nancy Britten
2007“Patient Participation in Formulating and Opening Sequences.” In Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations: Qualitative Perspectives, ed. by Sarah Collins, Nancy Britten, Joanna Ruusuvuori, and Andrew Thompson, 104–120. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod
Giddens, Anthony
1984The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove
(eds) 1999Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hendry, Richard
2009Building and Restoring Respectful Relationships in Schools. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heritage John
1985“Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun Van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rod D. Watson
1979“Formulations as Conversational Objects”. In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed”. Semiotica 30 (3/4): 245–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Malcolm, John Davis, Prout Alan, and Key Tisdall
2004“Moving the Participation Agenda Forward.” Children & Society 181: 77–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2005“Active Listening: Formulations and the Elicitation of Feelings-Talk in Child Counselling.” Research on language and Social Interaction 38 (3): 303–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Allison
2009“Agency”. In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies, ed. by Jens Qvortrup, William Corsaro, and Michael-Sebastian Honig, 34–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
James, Allison, Chris Jenks, and Alan Prout
1998Theorizing Childhood. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
1984Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
McHoul, Alexander
1990“The Organization of Repair in Classroom Talk.” Language in society 191: 349–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead Nicola, and Peter Bower
2000“Patient Centredness: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Empirical Literature.” Social Science & Medicine 511: 1087–1110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mearns, Dave, and Brian Thorne
1999Person-centred Counselling in Action. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Neil
2002“Developing Dialogues.” In Learning for Life in the 21st Century, ed. by Gordon Wells, and Guy Claxton, 141–153. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Neil, and Karen Littleton
2007Dialogue and Development of Children’s Thinking. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, Naomi Knight, and Ashley Watkins
O’Connor, Catherine, and Sarah Michaels
1996“Shifting Participant Frameworks: Orchestrating Thinking Practices in Group Discussion.” In Discourse, Learning, and Schooling, ed. by Deborah Hicks, 63–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percy-Smith, Barry, and Nigel Thomas
(eds) 2010A Handbook of Children’s and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, Carl
1951Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul
2004The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
2005“Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.” Language Teaching 38 (4): 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007“Interaction and Constructs”. In Language Learning and Teaching as Social Inter-action, ed. by Zhu Hua, Paul Seedhouse, and Vivian Cook, 9–21. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Tina
2008“How Can Teacher Talk Support Learning?” Linguistics and Education 191: 132–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John, and Michael Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse. The English used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sparks, Lisa, and Melinda Villagran
2010Patient and Provider Interaction. A Global Health Communication Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
2008“Exploring Leadership Conversations.” Management Communication Quarterly 21 (4): 529–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Houwen, Fleur
2009“Formulating Disputes.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 2072–2085. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Steven
2011Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Amri, Marwa & Olcay Sert
2022. Establishing understanding during student-initiated between-desk instructions in project work. Cambridge Journal of Education 52:6  pp. 667 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2019. Practices/1, Italy: Facilitating Participation in Early Childhood Education. In Children’s Self-determination in the Context of Early Childhood Education and Services [International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, 25],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2019. Using formulations to manage conflicts in classroom interactions. Language and Dialogue 9:2  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2021. Studying Hybrid Identities in Schools: Notes on a European Project. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny 47:4 (182)  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2022. Ways of Facilitating Children’ Agency. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2022. Researching Agency and Interaction: Methodological Considerations. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ],  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2022. Facilitation in the Education System. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2023. Structural variations of classroom interaction: implications for the education system. International Studies in Sociology of Education 32:3  pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2024. Facilitation of adolescents' agency and hybrid integration. Children & Society 38:2  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Farini, Federico & Angela Scollan
2023. What Is Facilitation?. In Pedagogical Innovation for Children's Agency in the Classroom,  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees de Glopper
2021. Text formulations as practices of demonstrating understanding in dialogic reading. Text & Talk 41:4  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Solem, Marit Skarbø & Karianne Skovholt
2019. Teacher Formulations in Classroom Interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.