Chapter published in:
Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science
Edited by Friederike Moltmann
[Language Faculty and Beyond 16] 2020
► pp. 159190
References

References

Ameel, E., Malt, B., & Storms, G.
(2008) Object naming and later lexical development: From baby bottle to beer bottle. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 262–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, E.
(1986) The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
Bale, A. C., & Barner, D.
(2009) The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics,26(3), 217–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., & Bachrach, A.
(2010) Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 40–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A.
(2011) Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 188, 87–96.Google Scholar
Barner, D., Inagaki, S., & Li, P.
(2009) Language, thought, and real nouns. Cognition, 111(3), 329–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Li, P., & Snedeker, J.
(2010) Words as windows to thought: The case of object representation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 195–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J.
(2005) Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Children’s early understanding of mass-count syntax: individuation, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis. Language Learning and Development, 2(3), 163–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Wagner, L., & Snedeker, J.
(2008) Events and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns. Cognition, 106(2), 805–832. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berko, J.
(1958)  The child’s learning of English morphology (Doctoral dissertation). Radcliffe College. Crossref
Bloom, P., & Kelemen, D.
(1995) Syntactic cues in the acquisition of collective nouns. Cognition, 56, 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P.
(1996) Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The Role of Semantics in Solving the Bootstrapping Problem. In R. Jackendoff, P. Bloom, & K. Wynn (Eds.), Language, logic, and concepts: Essays in memory of John Macnamara (pp. 285–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Semantic competence as an explanation for some transitions in language development. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Theoretical issues in language development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
(1933) Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S.
(1992) What sort of structure is needed to “bootstrap” into syntax? Cognition, 45, 77–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, N., Audet, J., & Barner, D.
(2012) Pragmatic inference, not semantic competence, guides 3-year-olds’ interpretation of unknown number words. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1066–1075. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, N., Pogue, A., & Barner, D. (2011) Piecing together numerical language: children’s use of default units in early counting and quantification. Developmental Science, 14(1), 44–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
(1957) Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 1–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bunt, H. C.
(1979) Ensembles and the formal semantic properties of mass terms. In Mass terms: Some philosophical problems (pp. 249–277). Netherlands: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Mass terms and model-theoretic semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burge, T.
(1972) Truth and mass terms. Journal of Philosophy, 69, 263–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S.
(2009) The Origin of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S., & Bartlett, E.
(1978) Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. Y.
(1973) Response to Moravcsik. In J. Hintikkia, J. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural language (pp. 286–288). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R.
(1998) Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385–412.Google Scholar
(1999) Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Y.-C., Lust, B., & Chiang, C.-P.
(2003) Chinese children’s comprehension of count-classifiers and mass-classifiers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 12, 91–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(1998) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In Events and grammar (pp. 53–103). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
(2010) Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174(1), 99–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V.
(1987) The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1990) On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 17, 417–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, K. M., & Xu, F.
(2007) Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?. Developmental psychology, 43(5), 1227–1238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Induction, overhypothesis, and the origin of abstract knowledge evidence from 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1871–1877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D. K.
(1988) Learning names for material: factors constraining and limiting hypotheses about word meaning. Cognitive Development, 3, 15–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S.
(1994) Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 5, 242Google Scholar
Féron, J., Gentaz, E., & Streri, A. (2006) Evidence of amodal representation of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-old infants. Cognitive Development, 21(2), 81–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1981) Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foppolo, F., Guasti, M. T., & Chierchia, G.
(2011) Scalar implicatures in child language: Give children a chance. Language Learning and Development, 8, 365–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C.
(1985) More and more and more about more . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40(1), 73–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A., & Taylor, M.
(1984) How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects. Child Development, 55(4), 1535–1540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1982) Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Language, thought, and culture (Vol. 2, pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L.
(2001) Individuation, relational relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, B. S.
(1992) Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(6), 597–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Collectivity and distributivity internal to English noun phrases. Language Sciences, 18 (1-2), 443–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, B., Kehayia, E., & Taler, V.
(1999) The mass/count distinction: Evidence from on-line psycholinguistic performance. Brain and Language, 68(1), 205–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P.
(1985) Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: The case of the count/mass distinction. Cognition, 20(3), 209–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Count/mass category acquisition: Distributional distinctions in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 15(1), 109–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, P.
(1969) Utterer’s meaning and intensions. The Philosophical Review, 68, 147–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J.
(1981) Form, function and the language acquisition device. In C. L. Baker, & J. L. McCarthy (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 165–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, M., Carvell, S. & Peltzer, L.
(1994) The sum and substance of it: The appreciation of mass and count quantifiers in Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Language, 44, 351–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T.
(2001) At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In Proceedings of SALT (Vol. 11, pp. 231–247).Google Scholar
Hespos, S. J., Saylor, M. M., & Grossman, S. R.
(2009) Infants’ ability to parse continuous actions. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 575–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J.
(1994) Mass and count quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17(5), 447–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997) A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62(2), 169–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N.
(1994) Children’s theories of word meaning: The role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9(1), 45–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, S., & Barner, D.
(2009) Countability in absence of count syntax: Evidence from Japanese quantity judgments. In M. Hirakawa, S. Inagaki, Y. Hirakawa, H. Sirai, S. Arita, H. Morikawa, M. Nakayama, & J. Tsubakita (Eds.), Studies in Language Sciences (8): Papers from the Eighth Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P. & Vigliocco, G.
(2010) Does the grammatical count/mass distinction affect semantic representations? Evidence from experiments in English and Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 189–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A.
(2009) Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382–10385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1924) The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E., & Macnamara, J.
(1974) What’s in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development, 469–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Hiraki, K., Mugitani, R., & Hasegawa, T.
(2004) Baby arithmetic: One object plus one tone. Cognition, 91, B23–B34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
(1989) Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In J. van Benthem, R. Bartsch, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression. Foris: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In G. Carlson, & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 398–411). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S.
(1988) The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3(3), 299–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landman, F.
(1991) Structures for semantics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E.
(1999) Concepts and cognitive science. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings (pp. 3–82). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, P., Barner, D. & Huang, B.
(2008) Classifiers as count syntax: Individuation and measurement in the acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. Language, Learning, and Development, 4(4), 249–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Ogura, T., Barner, D., Yang, S.-J., & Carey, S.
(2009) Does the conceptual distinction between singular and plural sets depend on language? Developmental Psychology, 45, 1644–1653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Dunham, Y., & Carey, S.
(2009) Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 487–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Link, G.
(1983) The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze, & A. Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of Language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Link, G. (1998) Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. A.
(1992) Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J.
(1982) Names for things: A study of human learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1986) A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malt, B. C.
(2010) Naming artifacts: Patterns and processes. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 52, pp. 1–38). San Diego: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F.
(1988) Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E.
(1985) Why superordinate category terms can be mass nouns. Cognition, 19, 31–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
(1987) Order of acquisition in the lexicon: Implication from Japanese numeral classifiers. In K. E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.) Children’s language (Vol. 6, pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mazuka, R., & Friedman, R. S.
(2000) Linguistic relativity in Japanese and English: Is language the primary determinant in object classification? Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(4), 353–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, F.
(1997) Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Part structures, integrity, and the mass-count distinction. Synthese, 116, 75–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Bisiacchi, P., Spironelli, C., Marinelli, K. & Semenza, C.
(2008) Mass and count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on early components. Neuroscience Letters, 430(1), 48–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T.
(1970) An analysis of mass and amount terms. Foundations of Language, 6, 362–388.Google Scholar
Pelletier, F. J.
(1979) Mass terms: Some philosophical problems [Synthese Language Library 6]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) A philosophical introduction to mass nouns. In F. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff [New Directions in Cognitive Science] (pp. 123–131). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1984) Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
 
Prasada, S., Ferenz, K., & Haskell, T. (2002) Conceiving of entities as objects and stuff. Cognition, 83, 141–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.
(1960) Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
(1969) Ontological relativity and other essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S.
(2010) Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), 343–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B.
(1999) Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure, and syntax correspond? Cognition, 73, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M.
(1971) Semantic assimilation in the development of relational categories. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar (pp. 63–101). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, R.
(1996) On the meaning of definite plural noun phrases (Vol. 61). Springer.Google Scholar
Senft, G. (2000) Systems of nominal classification [Language, Culture, and Cognition 4]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharon, T., & Wynn, K.
(1998) Individuation of actions from continuous motion. Psychological Science, 9(5), 357–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M., Tare, M., Nguyen, S. P., & Young, T.
(2010) Acquiring non-object terms: The case for time words. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(1), 16–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, E., & Shepperson, B.
(1990) Countable entities: Developmental changes. Cognition, 34, 109–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soja, N. N.
(1992) Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax. Cognitive Development, 7(1), 29–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S.
(1991) Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38(2), 179–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sophian, C., & Kalihiwa, C.
(1998) Units of counting: Developmental changes. Cognitive Development, 13, 561–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, M.
(2010) Do classifiers predict differences in cognitive processing? A study of nominal classification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognition, 2(2). 177–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, M., Chestnut, E., Li, P., & Barner, D.
(2013) Sortal concepts and pragmatic inference in children’s early quantification of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 66(3), 302–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starkey, P., Spelke, E. S., & Gelman, R.
(1983) Detection of intermodal numerical correspondences by human infants. Science, 222(4620), 179–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiller, A., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C.
(2011) Ad-hoc scalar implicatures in adults and children. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society .
Subrahmanyam, K., Landau, B., & Gelman, R.
(1999) Shape, material, and syntax: Interacting forces in children’s learning in novel words for objects and substances. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 249–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tare, M., Shatz, M., & Gilbertson, L.
(2008) Maternal uses of non-object terms in child-directed speech: Color, number and time. First Language, 28(1), 87–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H.
(1993) A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 64]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Martin, R. C., & Garrett, M. F.
(1999) Is “count” and “mass” information available when the noun is not? An investigation of tip of the tongue states and anomia. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 534–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, L., & Carey, S.
(2003) Individuation of objects and events: A developmental study. Cognition, 90(2), 163–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, K., Dobkins, K., & Barner, D.
(2013) Slow mapping: Color word learning as a gradual inductive process. Cognition, 127(3), 307–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S. R. & Markow, D. B. (1995) Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12-to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive psychology, 29(3), 257–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wisniewski, E. J., Imai, M. & Casey, L.
(1996) On the equivalence of superordinate concepts. Cognition, 60, 269–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, K.
(1990) Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Children’s acquisition of number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 220–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Infants’ individuation and enumeration of physical actions. Psychological Science, 7, 164–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Chiang, W. C.
(2002) Enumeration of collective entities by 5-month-old infants. Cognition, 83(3), B55–B62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F.
(2007) Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 400–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F., & Carey, S.
(1996) Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 111–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, K. & Keil, F.
(2000) The acquisition of Japanese numeral classifiers: Linkage between grammatical forms and conceptual categories. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(4), 379–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar