Cover not available
Article published In:
The Morphological Expression of Temporality on the Verb in French as a Second Language / L’expression morphologique de la temporalité sur le verbe en français langue seconde
Edited by Pascale Leclercq and Martin Howard
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6:1] 2015
► pp. 149–180

Effects of corrective feedback on L2 acquisition of tense-aspect verbal morphology

 | University of York, UK
In this study, the effectiveness of implicit corrective feedback was examined with a group of 30 sixteen-year-old English native speakers learning French, who received either recasts or clarification requests on errors they made with the passé composé and the imparfait. The control group did not receive any feedback. Overall, the results indicate that recasts were more effective in improving accuracy of form and use for both the passé composé and the imparfait. However, an examination of language development with reference to the Aspect Hypothesis and the inherent lexical aspect of verbs showed that no change occurred between the pretest and the posttests. The passé composé was associated exclusively with achievement verbs, whereas the imparfait was limited to several frequent irregular stative verbs and a few activity verbs.
Keywords: clarification requests, aspect, passé composé, imparfait, corrective feedback, recasts
Published online: 28 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.1.05mif
References (72)
Ammar, A. & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(4), 543–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R.W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition (305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(2), 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The Pidgin-Creole connection. In W. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (527–570). San Diego/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the ‘passé composé’ and the ‘imparfait’. The Modern Language Journal 85(2), 226–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal 881, 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, M.R. (2008). Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning 58(3), 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bergström, A. (1996). Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and EFL. Canadian Modern Language Review 521, 308–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, W.D. (1996). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 291, 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I. & Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 141, 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergström, A. (1995). The expression of past temporal reference by English-speaking learners of French. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, PA.Google Scholar
Braidi, S.M. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning 52(1), 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. (1995). The irrelevance of verbal feedback to language learning. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood Smith (eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (73–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Input and evidence. The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (114–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.D. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(3), 445–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics 10(3), 331–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2), 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research 371, 255–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning 54(2), 311–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1991). Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41(1–3), 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M.A. (1987). Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. In B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak & J.F. Lee (eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (52–60). Cambridge, New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Nouns and verbs. Language 63(1), 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1), 37–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2), 309–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., Inagaki, S. & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal 82(3), 357–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(1), 51–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(3), 399–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2), 269–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1), 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2), 265–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(4), 557–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82(3), 338–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(02), 179–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (323–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning 56(4), 693–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mifka-Profozic, N. (2014). Effectiveness of implicit negative feedback in foreign language classroom: The role of input, frequency, and saliency. In L. Roberts, I. Vedder & J. Hulstijn (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook141, 111–142.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning 50(4), 617–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (1983). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(1), 69–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44(3), 493–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C. & Klein, W. (1992). Why does the production of some learners not grammaticalize? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 141, 259–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on ‘Noticing the gap’: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1), 99–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, V. (1990). Developmental stages in the acquisition of the perfective and the imperfective aspects by classroom L2 learners of Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31(3), 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning 62(1), 93–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robison, R.E. (1990). The primacy of aspect. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(3), 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics 201, 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting. System 281, 135–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2), 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning 58(4), 835–874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. Dordrecht/New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R.W. (1995). The acquisition of tense–aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71(4), 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2002). Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: An embarrassment of riches? Second Language Research 18(2), 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y. (2007). The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(1), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46(2), 327–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2), 235–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Mifka‐Profozic, Nadia, Jennifer Behney, Susan M. Gass, Marijana Macis, Gaia Chiuchiù & Giulia Bovolenta
2023. Effects of Form‐Focused Practice and Feedback: A Multisite Replication Study of Yang and Lyster (2010). Language Learning 73:4 ► pp. 1164 ff. DOI logo
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé
2022. The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect. Language Teaching 55:3 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
IZQUIERDO, JESÚS & MARIA KIHLSTEDT
2019. L2 Imperfective Functions With Verb Types in Written Narratives: A Cross–Sectional Study With Instructed Hispanophone Learners of French. The Modern Language Journal 103:1 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
McManus, Kevin
2019. Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning. Language Awareness 28:2 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Howard, Martin & Pascale Leclercq
2017. Tense, aspect and modality in second language acquisition. In Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 50], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.