Article published In:
Linguistic Landscape: Online-First Articles

Garbage day as dispositive and semiotic landscape

A visual essay

ORCID logo | University of Bern
For many, garbage day functions as a mundane performance of civic and even national selfhood; yet garbage days are also practices with complex spatial and semiotic entanglements. To demonstrate this, I present a visual essay which draws on an ethnographically informed study of garbage day in five Swiss cities. At the intersection of semiotic landscape studies and dispositive analysis, these banal practices constitute biopolitical forms of governance and control. In this setting, waste reveals itself as a language-material formation; this interplay of words — both visible and invisible — and things is central to the distinct meanings and practices of wasting. Rather than approaching garbage bags as passive receptacles or neutral technologies, therefore, they are best understood as performative regimes by which waste is displaced, public space is ordered, and particular subjectivities are produced.
Keywords: waste, dispositive, semiotic landscape, ethnography, discard studies
Article outline
  • Part 1.Garbage day as dispositive and semiotic landscape
  • Part 2.The language materiality of garbage bags
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Endnotes
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.24020.pel
References (37)
References
Agamben, Giorgio (2009). ‘What is an apparatus?’: And other essays (David Kishik & Stefan Pedatella, Trans.). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2022). Scaling the pandemic dispositive: A multimodal analysis of mask-requirement signs during 2020. Linguistic Landscape, 8 (2–3), 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Catherine, & O’Hare, Patrick (2020). Waste and its disguises: Technologies of (un)knowing. Ethnos, 88 (3), 419–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28 (3), 801–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bührmann, Andrea D., & Schneider, Werner (2008). Mehr als nur diskursive Praxis? Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Aspekte der Dispositivanalyse. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 33 (1 (123)), 108–141. [URL]
Björkvall, Anders & Archer, Arlene (2021). Semiotics of destruction: Traces on the environment. Visual Communication, 21 (2), 218–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calvino, Italo (1974). Invisible cities (William Weaver, Trans.). New York: Harvest.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, Jillian R. (2017). How the sausage gets made: Food safety and the mediality of talk, documents, and food practices. In Jillian R. Cavanaugh & Shalini Shankar (Eds.), Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). Trash talk: Language as waste practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26 (3), 404–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, Jillian R., & Shankar, Shalini (2017). Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. (Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, & Kate Soper, Trans., Colin Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana (2022). The sound of absent-presence: Towards formulating a sociolinguistics of the spectre. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 45 ( 2 ), 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gille, Zsuzsa (2007). From the cult of waste to the trash heap of history: The politics of waste in socialist and postsocialist Hungary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gregson, Nicky, Metcalfe, Alan, & Crewe, Louise (2007). Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25 (4), 682–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Julian, Maesse, Jens, Scholz, Ronny, Angermuller, Johannes (2019). The academic dispositif: Towards a context-centred discourse analysis. In Scholz, Ronny (Eds.) Quantifying approaches to discourse for social scientists. Postdisciplinary studies in discourse (pp. 51–87). London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Gay (2003). Down the drain: Shit and the politics of disturbance. In Gay Hawkins & Stephen Muecke (Eds.), Culture and waste: The creation and destruction of value (pp. 39–52). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(2006). The ethics of waste: How we relate to rubbish. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(2007). Waste in Sydney: Unwelcome returns. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 122 (1), 348–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Kevin (2004). Secondhandedness: Consumption, disposal, and absent presence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22 (1), 157–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. (2017). Surveillant landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 3 (2), 149–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlander, David (2019). A semiotics of nonexistence? Erasure and erased writing under anti-graffiti regimes. Linguistic Landscape, 5 (2), 198–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laporte, Dominique (2000). History of shit (Radolphe el-Khoury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to the Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liboiron, Max, & Lepawski, Josh (2022). Discard studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Sarah A. (2012). Garbage matters: Concepts in new geographies of waste. Progress in Human Geography, 36 (6), 780–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellanda, Alessandro (2021). Recycling privilege: The social semiotics of waste and class in Switzerland. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Bern.
Peltonen, Matti (2004). From discourse to ‘dispositif’: Michel Foucault’s two histories. Historical Reflections/ Réflexions Historiques, 30 (2), 205–219. [URL]
Reno, Joshua Ozias (2014). Toward a new theory of waste: From ‘Matter out of Place’ to signs of life. Theory, Culture & Society, 31 (6), 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). Does waste make language? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26 (3), 418–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron, & Scollon, Suzie Wong (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strasser, Susan (1999). Waste and want: A social history of trash. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Straw, William (2010). Spectacles of Waste. In Alexandra Boutros & William Straw (Eds.), Circulation and the City: Essays on urban culture (pp. 193–213). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin (2022). Rubbish? Envisioning a sociolinguistics of waste. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26 (3), 386–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, Pellanda, Alessandro, & Wohlgemuth, Laura (2022). The discursive chronotopes of waste: Temporal laminations and linguistic hauntings. Language in Society, 51(5), 819–837. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve, & Neyland, Daniel (2013). Mundane Governance: Ontology and accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj (2009). The plague of fantasies. London: Verso.Google Scholar