Cover not available
Part of
Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched pedagogy
Edited by Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno and Hae In Park
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 49] 2018
► pp. 291–311

Chapter 13
Examining multifaceted sources of input

Variationist and usage-based approaches to understanding the L2 classroom

| Indiana University
| Indiana University
| Indiana University
| Grand Valley State University
| Texas Tech University
| Indiana University
| The State University of New York at Albany

Input is a central, driving component in nearly all theories of second language acquisition, but little is known about the relationship between the instructor-provided input to which classroom second language learners are exposed and attested patterns of acquisition. Our study investigates this relationship through an examination of instructors’ Spanish subject expression in oral and written classroom input, as well as their subject expression during three sociolinguistic tasks. Our analysis of five native-speaking instructors’ subject expression, a variable structure, revealed several common patterns across input modes, such as the distribution of the three most common subject forms, as well as subtle differences in the factors constraining use across input modes and tasks. Findings are discussed in relationship to what is known about the acquisition of Spanish subject forms by second language learners, and implications and areas for future research are outlined.  

Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The centrality of input
  • Subject forms in Spanish
  • Subject expression in L2 Spanish
  • The current study
    • Participants
    • Tasks and procedure
    • Coding and analysis
  • Results
    • Oral input
    • Written input
    • Sociolinguistic tasks
    • Results summary
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion and future directions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.13gur
References
Abreu, L.
(2009) Spanish subject personal pronoun use by monolinguals, bilinguals and second language learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
Azevedo, M. M.
(2008) Introducción a la lingüística española. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14(3), 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, R.
(1993) Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change, 5(3), 305–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R., & Flores-Ferrán, N.
(2004) Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1, 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A., Orozco, R., & Shin, N.
(2015) Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(Ed.) (1980) The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V.
(2009) First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S.
(2011) Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R.
(1985) Some theoretical and pedagogical implications of the markedness differential hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(3), 289–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(Eds.) (2009) Language as a complex adaptive system. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gaies, S. J.
(1979) Linguistic input in first and second language learning. In F. Eckman & A. Hastings (Eds.), Studies in first and second language acquisition (pp. 185–193). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A.
(2010) An exploration of the range and frequency of occurrence of forms in potentially-variable structures in second language Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 433–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Linford, B., & Fafulas, S.
(2015) Variable subject expression in second language Spanish: Uncovering the developmental sequence and predictive linguistic factors. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. L. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Linford, B., Fafulas, S., Long, A. Y., & Díaz-Campos, M.
(2013) The L2 development of subject form variation in Spanish: The individual vs. the group. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. Elana Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 156–174). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M.
(2001) Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta‐analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A., House, L., & Geeslin, K.
(2013) What a Bayesian analysis can do for the sociolinguistic study of subject expression in second-language Spanish. Language Learning, 63(1), 371–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, B.
(2008) Second language phonology in optimality theory. In J. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 117–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heining-Boynton, A. L., LeLoup, J. W., & Cowell, G. S.
(2012) ¡Anda! Curso intermedio. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D.
(1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N.
(1996) Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2425–2438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Little, D., Devitt, S., & Singleton, D.
(1994) The communicative approach and authentic texts. In A. Swarbrick (Ed.), Teaching modern languages (pp. 43–47). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lubbers Quesada, M.
(2015) The L2 acquisition of Spanish subjects: Multiple perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton Peirce, B.
(1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, S. Y.
(2001) Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C.
(2012) Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T. L., & Liskin-Gasparro, J.
(2014) We have moved on: Current concepts and positions in generative SLA. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 601–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
(2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E.
(2007) Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19, 101–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Lee, J. F., Ballman, T. L., & Farley, A. P.
(2010) Vistazos: Un curso breve. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (2015) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S.
(1994) The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2020. Chapter 6. Variationist perspective(s) on interlocutor individual differences. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2021. Chapter 10. Sophisticated language use in context. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
GEESLIN, KIMBERLY L., DANIELLE DAIDONE, AVIZIA Y. LONG & MEGAN SOLON
2023. Usage‐Based Models of Second Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Travis Evans-Sago
2020. Chapter 2. Bilingualism, second language acquisition, and language contact. In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Stephen Fafulas
2022. Chapter 7. Linguistic variation and second language Spanish. In Variation in Second and Heritage Languages [Studies in Language Variation, 28], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L., Aarnes Gudmestad, Matthew Kanwit, Bret Linford, Avizia Long, Lauren B. Schmidt & Megan Solon
2018. Chapter 1. Sociolinguistic competence and the acquisition of speaking. In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes & Amanda Edmonds
2022. EXPLORING CROSSLINGUISTIC INFLUENCE IN GENDER MARKING IN SPANISH. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:4 ► pp. 998 ff. DOI logo
Gupton, Timothy & Silvia Sánchez Calderón
2023. Focus at the syntax–discourse interface in L2 Spanish: Optionality and unaccusativity reconsidered. Second Language Research 39:1 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2017. Chapter 7. Instructor individual characteristics and L2 interaction. In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2020. Chapter 10. Synthesizing cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2020. Chapter 1. Introducing cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura, Kimberly L. Geeslin, Avizia Yim Long & Danielle Daidone
2017. Chapter 10. Linguistic variation in instructor provision of oral input. In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura & Luke Plonsky
2017. Chapter 13. Look who’s interacting. In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Linford, Bret & Kimberly Geeslin
2022. The role of referent cohesiveness in variable subject expression in L2 Spanish. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Long, Avizia Yim & Kimberly L. Geeslin
2020. Chapter 7. Examining the role of instructor first language in classroom-based oral input. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider
2021. A Challenge for Contrastive L1/L2 Corpus Studies: Large Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation Across Morphological, but Not Global Syntactic Categories in Task-Based Corpus Data of a Homogeneous L1 German Group. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.