Cover not available
Part of
Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition
Edited by Aarnes Gudmestad and Amanda Edmonds
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 51] 2018
► pp. 149–170

Chapter 6
The potential of publicly shared longitudinal learner corpora in SLA research

 | University of South Florida
 | University of South Florida
Most second language acquisition (SLA) researchers would agree that longitudinal data can potentially yield the most valuable insights into second-language development, yet few longitudinal studies exist. It is also rare to find longitudinal studies with data collected beyond the one year mark. In this chapter we argue for the need to adopt more longitudinal research agendas in SLA and the potential of publicly shared learner corpora to help broaden the impact of the data collected. We use as an example work from the longitudinal project, LANGSNAP, which now includes a new set of data collected in 2016, thus expanding the project to 5 years and adding a new research question, that of the long-term evolution of foreign-language proficiency.
Keywords: second language acquisition, longitudinal research, learner corpus research, Spanish as a second language, French as a second language, foreign-language attrition, study abroad
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Longitudinal research in SLA
    • The potential of publicly shared longitudinal learner corpora
  • LANGSNAP and LANGSNAP 3.0
    • Considerations for mitigating participant attrition
    • Considerations for study design: Using the same instruments or different ones?
    • Considerations for data collection
    • Considerations for data preparation: What to annotate for a publicly shared learner corpus?
  • Looking ahead to the future and LANGSNAP 6.0
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.51.07tra
References (57)
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1996). CELEX. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64, 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Stringer, D. (2010). Variables in second language attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen. R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.18) [Computer program]. Accessed at <[URL]> (1 January, 2017).
Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63, 163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M. J., Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2013). The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 558–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, A., & Gudmestad, A. (2018). Gender marking in written L2 French: Before, during, and after residence abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 3, 58–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harklau, L. (2008). Developing qualitative longitudinal case studies of advanced language learners. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp.23–35). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howard, M. (2012). The advanced learner’s sociolinguistic profile: On issues of individual differences, second language exposure conditions, and type of sociolinguistic variable. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017a). L2 utterance fluency development before, during, and after residence abroad: A multidimensional investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 755–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keijzer, M. (2007). Last in first out? An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kinginger, C., & Blattner, G. (2008). Histories of engagement and sociolinguistic awareness in study abroad: Colloquial French. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp.223–246). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 200–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1939). Speech development of a bilingual child: A linguist’s record. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The Childes project: Tools for analyzing talk. Transcription format and programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2017). A shared platform for studying second language acquisition. Language Learning, 67, 254–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McManus, K., Mitchell, R., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2014). Understanding insertion and integration in a study abroad context: The case of English-speaking sojourners in France. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, XIX(2), 97–116.Google Scholar
McManus, K., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Mitchell, R. (2016, September). L2 linguistic development before, during, and after a nine-month sojourn: Evidence from L2 French and Spanish. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF) annual conference, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Milton, J. (2003). X_lex: The Swansea levels test. Newbury: Express.Google Scholar
Mehotcheva, T. H. (2010). After the fiesta is over: Foreign language attrition of Spanish in Dutch and German Erasmus students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. (2015) Developmental patterns in learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.379–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., & Littre, D. (2013). Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual “corpus cum experimental data” approach. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 61–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. J. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Domínguez, L., Arche, M. J., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2008). SPLLOC: A new database for Spanish second language acquisition research. EuroSLA yearbook, 8, 287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships, and language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F. (2005). Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 21, 373–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp.58–72). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015). Second language acquisition theory and learner corpus research. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.309–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., & Mitchell, R. (2004). Using information technology to support empirical SLA research. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 69–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (Eds.) (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25 , 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J. M., & Rabie, S. (2002, October). An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in crosslinguistic SLA research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF) annual conference, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35, 184–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rees, J., & Klapper, J. (2008). Issues in the quantitative longitudinal measurement of second language progress in the study abroad context. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp.89–106). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Mehotcheva, T. (2012). Foreign language attrition. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 102–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). Second language acquisition: The pidginization hypothesis. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp.256–271). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Skiba, R., Dittmar, N., & Bressem, J. (2008). Planning, collecting, exploring, and archiving longitudinal L2 data: Experiences from the P-MoLL project. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp.73–88). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spenader, A. (2008). Acquiring oral language skills over the course of a high school year abroad: What’s in it for absolute beginners. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp.247–263). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2014). “Repeat as much as you can”: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2 French. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds, & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp.143–166). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., Mitchell, R., & McManus, K. (2016). The LANGSNAP longitudinal learner corpus: Design and use. In M. Alonso Ramos (Ed.), Spanish learner corpus research: State of the art (pp.117–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Zee, K. I., & van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2000). The multicultural personality questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 291–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, N. (2013). Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, C. H., Savola, K. L., & Phelps, E. (1991). Inventory of longitudinal studies in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M., & Langer, M. (2015). The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 93–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuldashev, A., Fernandez, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2013). Second language learners’ contiguous and discontiguous multi-word unit use over time. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y. (2012). Exploring long-term productive vocabulary development in an EFL context: The role of motivation. System, 40, 104–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Paquot, Magali
2024. Learner corpus research: a critical appraisal and roadmap for contributing (more) to SLA research agendas. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo
Huensch, Amanda
2023. Effects of speaking task and proficiency on the midclause pausing characteristics of L1 and L2 speech from the same speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:4 ► pp. 1031 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes
2022. Development of grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics in an additional language: insights from Spanish learner corpus research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Claudia, Barbara De Cock & Nicole Tracy-Ventura
2022. Spanish corpora and their pedagogical uses: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2021. „Ist es B2-Niveau genug?“. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2021:75 ► pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2022. Gesprochene Lernerkorpora des Deutschen: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
2019. Using Variationism and Learner Corpus Research to Investigate Grammatical Gender Marking in Additional Language Spanish. Language Learning 69:4 ► pp. 911 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
2021. Moving Beyond the Native-Speaker Bias in the Analysis of Variable Gender Marking. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.