Cover not available
Article published In:
40 Years of Bill 101 in Québec
Edited by François Vaillancourt
[Language Problems and Language Planning 43:2] 2019
► pp. 113–134

Quebec’s new language dynamic

French fading fast

| University of Ottawa

Census data are used to monitor the efficiency of Bill 101 in reorienting language shift more favourably for French. Immigration from former French colonies or Romance-language countries is shown to be the major factor driving the increase in the share of French in the assimilation of Allophones since 1991. The schooling provisions of Bill 101 are seen to play a significant supporting role in this respect, but not those promoting French as language of work. It is further shown that the corresponding trend towards a greater share for French in overall assimilation has become seriously compromised by a growing Anglicization of Francophones themselves, notably in the Montreal metropolitan area. The resulting consolidation of the superiority of English as language of assimilation in Quebec is seen to explain in large part the emergence of a new language dynamic since 2001, combining a record decline in relative weight of Quebec’s French-speaking majority with a mild but equally historic increase in weight of its English-speaking minority.

Keywords: language vitality, language shift, assimilation, language policy, Quebec, Bill 101
Article outline
  • Opening remarks
  • 1.The context before 1977
    • 1.1Mother tongue trends from 1951 to 1976
    • 1.2The vitality of French prior to Bill 101
  • 2.Trends shortly following Bill 101
    • 2.1Mother tongue trends from 1971 to 1986
    • 2.2Home language
    • 2.3Language shift
    • 2.4Knowledge of English and French
  • 3.Trends during 1991–2001
    • 3.1The 1991 and 2001 comparability breaks
    • 3.2Mother tongue trends from 1991 to 2001
    • 3.3Home language
    • 3.4Language shift
    • 3.5Knowledge of English and French
  • 4.From 2001 to 2016
    • 4.1Mother tongue
    • 4.2Home language
    • 4.3Language shift
    • 4.4Knowledge of English and French
    • 4.5Language of work
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00038.cas
References
Casesnoves Ferrer, R., & Sankoff, D.
(2004) Transmission, Education, and Integration in Projections of Language Shift in Valencia. Language Policy, 31, 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castonguay, C.
(1994) L’assimilation linguistique au Québec : mesure et évolution 1971–1986. Quebec, Qc: Conseil de la langue française.Google Scholar
(2005a) Les indicateurs généraux de vitalité des langues au Québec : comparabilité et tendances 1971–2001. Montreal, Qc: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
(2005b) Incidence du sous-dénombrement et des changements apportés aux questions de recensement sur l’évolution de la composition linguistique de la population du Québec entre 1991 et 2001. Montreal, Qc: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
Houle, R., & Corbeil, J.-P.
(2017) Language Projections for Canada, 2011 to 2036. Ottawa, On: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Henripin, J.
(1974) Immigration and Language Imbalance. Ottawa, On: Information Canada.Google Scholar
Joy, R.
(1967) Languages in Conflict: The Canadian Experience. Ottawa, On: the author. Reprinted in 1972 by McClelland & Stuart, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Laurin, C.
(1977) La politique québécoise de la langue française. Quebec, Qc: Éditeur officiel.Google Scholar
Ostler, N.
(2010) The Last Lingua Franca: English Until the Return of Babel. New York, NY: Walker & Company.Google Scholar
Termote, M., & Gauvreau, D.
(1988) La situation démolinguistique au Québec. Quebec, Qc: Conseil de la langue française.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Bourhis, Richard Y.
2022. Group Vitality, Language Policies and the French and English-Speaking Communities of Quebec. In Language, Policy and Territory, ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Bousmah, Ibrahim & Gilles Grenier
2021. Immigrant linguistic integration in the multilingual context of Montreal. Language Problems and Language Planning 45:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Corbeil, Jean-Pierre
2021. Sortir des ornières de la démolinguistique classique : mieux comprendre l’évolution du français au Québec : Frédéric Lacroix, Pourquoi la loi 101 est un échec, Montréal, Boréal, 2020, 264 p.. Recherches sociographiques 62:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Flors-Mas, Aveŀlí, Natxo Sorolla, Miquel Àngel Pradilla & F. Xavier Vila
2021. The recent evolution of first languages in Catalonia. Language Problems and Language Planning 45:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Grenier, Gilles
2022. Langues utilisées à la maison et au travail à Montréal par les immigrants entre 2001 et 2016 : progrès notoire, mais fragile du français. Recherches sociographiques 63:3 ► pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
Grin, François & Guillaume Fürst
2022. Measuring Linguistic Diversity: A Multi-level Metric. Social Indicators Research 164:2 ► pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Ridala, Svetlana
2020. Language skills and labour market returns. Language Problems and Language Planning 44:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Taylor Reid, Kym, Pavel Trofimovich, Mary Grantham O’Brien & Aki Tsunemoto
2022. USING TASK PRACTICE TO REDUCE SOCIAL INFLUENCES ON LISTENER EVALUATIONS OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACCENT AND COMPREHENSIBILITY. International Journal of Listening 36:3 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.