Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 45:2 (2022) ► pp.312–337

Causative constructions in Bodo-Garo

 | Central Institute of Indian Languages
The Bodo-Garo group of languages consisting of Kāchārī or Bodo, Lālung (autonym Tiwa), Dīmā-sā, Gārō, Koch, Rābhā, Tipurā (autonym Kokborok), Chutiyā (autonym Deori) and Morān (Grierson 1903) are mainly spoken by about four million people in north-east India.
BG exhibit systematic processes of formation of causative verbs through prefixation, suffixation and very rarely, infixation. Lexical causative verbs are also employed in these languages whereas periphrastic causatives are found in the form of verb stacking. This study aims at finding out the causative prefixes which co-occur with the root verbs to form their causative counterparts; categorizing the prefixes in terms of their occurrences with certain roots; and, analyzing the environments and linguistic conditioning of the occurrences of the prefixes. This study also discusses several syntactic and semantic features associated with causation.
Keywords: causative verbs, Bodo-Garo, causative prefixes, causative suffixes, valency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction to Bodo-Garo group of languages
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Methods of data collection and analysis
  • 4.Formation of causative verbs in Bodo-Garo
    • 4.1Formation of causative verbs through prefixation in Bodo-Garo
      • 4.1.1Bodo
      • 4.1.2Dimasa
      • 4.1.3Kokborok
      • 4.1.4Rabha
      • 4.1.5Tiwa
      • 4.1.6Causative from transitive verbs
    • 4.2Phonology of BG causative verbs
      • 4.2.1Vowel harmony
      • 4.2.2Consonant devoicing
      • 4.2.3Consonant co-occurring pairs
      • 4.2.4Gliding
    • 4.3Causative suffixes in Bodo-Garo
    • 4.4Causative infixes in Bodo-Garo
    • 4.5Double causative
    • 4.6Triple causative
    • 4.7Causative constructions in Bodo-Garo as verb incorporation
    • 4.8Periphrastic causative constructions
  • 5.Case assignment by causative verbs to their different roles
  • 6.Change in valency and occurrence of causative affixes
  • 7.The case of {bi-}: Syncretism of close but different features
  • 8.Inherent causative constructions
  • 9.Functions
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21023.bra
References (29)
References
Balawan, M. 1975. Outlines of Lalung grammar. Shillong: Don Bosco Technical School.Google Scholar
Baro, Daithun. 2017. Process of word formation in Bodo. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 6(11). 46–58. Retrieved from [URL] on April 12, 2020.
Basumatary, Prafulla. 2017. Verbal semantics in a Tibeto-Burman language: The Bodo verb. Oxford: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boro, Krishna. 2012. Serialized verbs in Boro. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics 4 1, 83–103. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd./Foundation Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brahma, Aleendra. 2013. Modern Bodo grammar. Guwahati: N.L. Publications.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (Syntax and semantics 6), 261–312. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Daimai, Kailadbou & I. D. Raguibou. 2020. Causatives in Liangmai. Himalayan Linguistics 19(2). 30–43. Retrieved from DOI logo on January 15, 2021.Google Scholar
Debbarma, Binoy. 2001. Concise Kokborok-English-Bengali dictionary. Agartala, Tripura: Caxton Printers.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2022. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 25th edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]
Evans, Jonathan P. & Dhrubajit Langthasa. 2022. Dimasa language: Structure and texts. Language and Linguistics. Published online. Retrieved from [URL] on April 5, 2022.
Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grierson, G. A. 1903. Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. III1, Part II. Kolkata: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
1927. Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. I1, Part I. Kolkata: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1997. The Misumalpan causative construction. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 199–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2019. The labial causative in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 12(1). 1–11.Google Scholar
Jose, U. V. 2014. Tiwa-English dictionary with English-Tiwa index. Shillong: Don Bosco Centre for Indigenous Cultures.Google Scholar
Joseph, U. V. 2005. Causatives in Rabha. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28 (2). 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Rabha. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2008. Causative prefixes in four Boro-Garo languages. In Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics 11. 153–167. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd./Foundation Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, P. R. 2005. Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics Vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling. 2017. The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages 2nd edition, 213–242. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (Syntax and semantics 6), 1–39. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 2007. Lexical typologies. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 66–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar