Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.271291
Bickel, Balthasar, Manoj Rai, Netra Paudyal, Goma Banjade, Toya Nath Bhatta, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Iccha Purna Rai, Novel K Rai & Sabine Stoll
2010The syntax of three-argument verbs in Chintang and Belhare (Southeastern Kiranti). In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: a comparative handbook, 382–408. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6.1. 83–101.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
1993A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre
2003La sémantique du prédicat en mwotlap (Vanuatu). Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W
2014A note on voicing alternation in the Tibetan verbal system. Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2010aThe inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11.1. 127–157.Google Scholar
2010bThe origin of the reflexive prefix in Rgyalrong languages. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African studies 73.2. 261–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012aAgreement morphology: the case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13.1. 83–116.Google Scholar
2012bAn Internal Reconstruction of Tibetan Stem Alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110.2. 212–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012cArgument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds.), Ergativity, Valency and Voice, 199–226. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012dFrom denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122.11. 1207–1231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013aApplicative and tropative derivations in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36.2. 1–13.Google Scholar
2013bDerivational morphology in Khaling. In Li Fang-Kuei Society for Chinese Linguistics, Young Scholar Symposium, University of Washington at Seattle.Google Scholar
2013cHarmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17.2. 187–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014aClause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2. 263–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014bDenominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 1381. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
under review. Generic person marking in Japhug and other Rgyalrong languages.
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov
2014Direct / inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8/71. 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2013La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. Université Paris III MA thesis.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy
2003An overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 22–42. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy & Jiangling Yang
2005Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong/Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics 21. 1–13.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsulin
2012The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13.1. 1–28.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd
1988La langue hayu. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou
2014Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81. 119–135.Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean-Robert
2004A Grammar of Wambule. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pooth, Roland
2014Die Diathesen Aktiv vs. Medium und die Verbsemantik im Vedischen der Rgveda-Samhita: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent &William H. Baxter
2012Reconstructing the s- prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics 13.1. 29–59.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S
2000Stem Alternations in Puxi Verb Inflection: Toward Validating the rGyalrongic Subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics 1.2. 211–232.Google Scholar
2007The irrealis category in rGyalrong. Language & Linguistics 8.3. 797–819.Google Scholar
2014Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 630–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shidanluo
2002Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「»{同等第」相關的語法²{象 (Empathy Hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics 3.1. 79–99.Google Scholar
Taylor, Allan R
1976On Verbs of Motion in Siouan Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 42.2. 287–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Jacques, Guillaume
2017. A note on volitional and non-volitional prefixes in Gyalrong languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2017. A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2020. Voicing alternation and sigmatic causative prefixation in Tibetan. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 83:2  pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2021. Betrayal through obedience: on the history of the unusual inflectional chain in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Linguistic Typology 25:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Mattiola, Simone
2021. The non-universality of linguistic categories. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132],  pp. 279 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.