Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.271291
References (35)
Bickel, Balthasar, Manoj Rai, Netra Paudyal, Goma Banjade, Toya Nath Bhatta, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Iccha Purna Rai, Novel K Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2010. The syntax of three-argument verbs in Chintang and Belhare (Southeastern Kiranti). In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: a comparative handbook, 382–408. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6.1. 83–101.Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1993. A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2003. La sémantique du prédicat en mwotlap (Vanuatu). Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2014. Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2014. A note on voicing alternation in the Tibetan verbal system. Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010a. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11.1. 127–157.Google Scholar
. 2010b. The origin of the reflexive prefix in Rgyalrong languages. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African studies 73.2. 261–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. Agreement morphology: the case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13.1. 83–116.Google Scholar
. 2012b. An Internal Reconstruction of Tibetan Stem Alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110.2. 212–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012c. Argument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds.), Ergativity, Valency and Voice, 199–226. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012d. From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122.11. 1207–1231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Applicative and tropative derivations in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36.2. 1–13.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Derivational morphology in Khaling. In Li Fang-Kuei Society for Chinese Linguistics, Young Scholar Symposium, University of Washington at Seattle.Google Scholar
. 2013c. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17.2. 187–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. Clause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2. 263–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 1381. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. under review. Generic person marking in Japhug and other Rgyalrong languages.
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov. 2014. Direct / inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8/71. 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2013. La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. Université Paris III MA thesis.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. 2003. An overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 22–42. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy & Jiangling Yang. 2005. Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong/Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics 21. 1–13.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsulin. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13.1. 1–28.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue hayu. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou. 2014. Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81. 119–135.Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean-Robert. 2004. A Grammar of Wambule. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pooth, Roland. 2014. Die Diathesen Aktiv vs. Medium und die Verbsemantik im Vedischen der Rgveda-Samhita: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent &William H. Baxter. 2012. Reconstructing the s- prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics 13.1. 29–59.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2000. Stem Alternations in Puxi Verb Inflection: Toward Validating the rGyalrongic Subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics 1.2. 211–232.Google Scholar
. 2007. The irrealis category in rGyalrong. Language & Linguistics 8.3. 797–819.Google Scholar
. 2014. Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 630–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shidanluo. 2002. Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「»{同等第」相關的語法²{象 (Empathy Hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics 3.1. 79–99.Google Scholar
Taylor, Allan R. 1976. On Verbs of Motion in Siouan Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 42.2. 287–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä. 2010. Benefactives and Malefactives: Typological Perspectives and Case Studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Gates, Jesse P.
2024. Anticausativization in Gyalrongic languages. Studies in Language DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2021. Betrayal through obedience: on the history of the unusual inflectional chain in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Linguistic Typology 25:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Mattiola, Simone
2021. The non-universality of linguistic categories. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132],  pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2017. A note on volitional and non-volitional prefixes in Gyalrong languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2017. A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2020. Voicing alternation and sigmatic causative prefixation in Tibetan. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 83:2  pp. 283 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.