Visual images and image-text relations in ELT textbooks for young learners
A noteworthy change in China’s newly released national English language curriculum standards is the inclusion of
‘viewing’ ability, i.e., the skill of acquiring information conveyed in multimodal discourses like graphics, photos and animation
(
MOE, 2022a). To investigate how ELT textbooks are compiled to foster learners’
viewing ability, we conducted a descriptive content analysis of two ELT textbook series (
N1 = 12,
N2 = 6) for young learners. Informed by Fingeret’s classification of graphics (2012) and Martinec and
Salway’s framework of image-text relations (
2005), we coded a total of 7182 visual
images to examine how different types of visual images and image-text relations were utilised in terms of frequency and
distribution in the two textbook series. Results show that both textbook series feature the use of diverse visual images and the
Chinese ELT textbook series exclusively uses cartoons, whereas the global ELT textbooks use photos in addition to cartoons.
Regarding image-text status relations, equal relations constitute a larger percentage than unequal relations, and the expansion
logico-sematic relations appear much more frequently than the projection relations. Implications for dealing with visual images
and image-text relations in ELT textbooks for young learners are suggested in the conclusion section.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Working definition of visual images
- 2.2Visual images in ELT textbooks
- 2.3Types of visual images
- 2.4Image-text relations
- 2.5The present study
- 3.Method
- 3.1Sample
- 3.2Coding schemes
- 3.3Coding procedures
- 3.4Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Frequency and proportion of visual image type
- 4.2Distribution of visual image type
- 4.3Frequency and proportion of image-text status relation
- 4.4Distribution of image-text relation type
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Visual image types and their distributions
- 5.2Image-text types and their distributions
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (44)
References
Barthes, R. (1977). ‘Rhetoric
of the Image’, in S. Heath (trans.) Image–Music–
Text. Fontana.
Chan, E. (2011). Integrating
visual and verbal meaning in multimodal text comprehension: Towards a model of intermodal
relations. In Dreyfus, S., Hood, S. & Stenglin, M. (eds). Semiotic
Margins: Meaning in
Multimodalities (pp.144–167). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Chen, Y. (2010). The
semiotic construal of attitudinal curriculum goals: Evidence from EFL textbooks in
China. Linguistics and
Education,
21
(1), 60–74. 

Cheng, X. & Cong, L. (2020). The
design and use of imagery resources in English textbook development. Curriculum, Teaching
Material and
Method
40
(08), 78–85.
Cole, F. (1988). Content
analysis: process and application. Clinical Nurse
Specialist
2
(1), 53–57. 

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing
your coursebook. Heinemann.
Drisko, J. W. & Maschi, T. (2016). Content
Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Elmiana, D. S. (2019). Pedagogical
representation of visual images in EFL textbooks: a multimodal perspective. Pedagogy, Culture
&
Society,
27
(3), 1–16. 

Evans, M. A., Watson, C. & Willows, D. M. (1987). A
Naturalistic Inquiry into Illustrations in Instructional
Textbooks. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The
psychology of illustration: II. Instructional
Issues (pp.87–115). New York: Springer. 

Fingeret, L. (2012). Graphics
in children’s informational texts: A content analysis. [Doctoral
dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. [URL]
Fleming, M. (1967). Classification
and Analysis of Instructional Illustrations. AV Communication
Review,
15
(3), 246–258. 

Goldsmith, E. (1986). Illustrated
educational books for middle school children Learning from illustrations: factors in the design of
illustrated. Word & Image: A Journal of Verbal/Visual
Enquiry,
2
(2), 111–121. 

Guo, N., & Feng, D. (2015). Infusing
multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an
ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and
Education,
31
1, 115–129. 

Guo, D., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. M. (2018). A
content analysis of visuals in elementary school textbooks. Elementary School
Journal,
119
(2), 244–269. 

Guo, D., McTigue, E., Matthews, S. & Zimmer, W. (2020). The
impact of visual displays on learning across the disciplines: a systematic review. Educational
Psychology
Review
32
(3), 627–656. 

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An
Introduction to Functional
Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hu, C., & Schuele, C. (2015). When
Language Experience Fails to Explain Word Reading Development: Early Cognitive and Linguistic Profiles of Young Foreign
Language Learners. The Modern Language Journal (Boulder,
Colo.),
99
(4), 754–770. 

Hunter, B., Crismore, A. & Pearson, P. D. (1987). Visual
Displays in Basal Readers and Social Studies Textbooks. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The
psychology of illustration: II. Instructional
Issues. (pp. 116–134). Springer. 

Isnaini, F., Setyono, B., & Ariyanto, S. (2019). A
visual semiotic analysis of multicultural values in an Indonesian English textbook. Indonesian
Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
8
(3), 545–553. 

Janko, T. & Peskova, K. (2013). Analysing
the types of visuals in textbooks of geography and German language: considering the instructional functioning of
photographs. The
Anthropologist
16
(1–2), 363–372. 

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading
images: The grammar of visual design 2nd edition. Routledge. 

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content
analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd
ed.). Sage.
Lai, H. (2018). Image-text
relations in junior high school EFL textbooks in China: a mixed-methods study. Journal of
Language Teaching and
Research (
9
)61, 1177–1190.
Liu, Y. & Khine, M. (2016). Content
analysis of the diagrammatic representations of primary science textbooks. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education
12
(8), 1937–1951.
Liu, Y. & O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Intersemiotic
texture: analysing cohesive devices between language and images. Social
Semiotics
19
(4), 367–388. 

Marefat, F. & Marzban, S. (2014). Multimodal
Analysis of Gender Representation in ELT Textbooks: Reader’s Perceptions. Procedia – Social and
Behavioral
Sciences, 981, 1093–1099. 

Martinec, R. & Salway, A. (2005). A
system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual
Communication, (3), 337–371. 

Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2007). The multimodal page: A systemic functional exploration. In T.D. Royce & W.L. Bowcher (Eds), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R. (2001). Multi-media
learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Ministry of Education
(MOE). (2020). Management measures for primary and secondary school teaching
materials. Retrieved April 25,
2023, from [URL]
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021). Notice
of the General Office of the Ministry of Education on Issuing the 2021 Catalogue of Teaching Materials for Primary and
Secondary Schools. Retrieved April 25,
2023, [URL]
Ministry of Education
(MOE). (2022a). National English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory
Education. Beijing Normal University Press.
Ministry of Education
(MOE). (2022b). Number of students of formal education by type and
level. Retrieved April 25,
2023, [URL]
Mohd Yasin, M. S., Abdul Hamid, B., Othman, Z., Abu Bakar, K., Hashim, F., & Mohti, A. (2012). A
visual analysis of a Malaysian English school textbook: gender matters. Asian Social
Science,
8
(12), 1871–1880. 

Nhat, T. N. M. & Pha, N. T. M. (2019). Exploring
text-image relations in English comics for children: the case of “Little Red Riding Hood”. VNU
Journal of Foreign
Studies
35
(3), 127–138.
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection
of key competencies. [URL]
O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic
functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual
imagery. Visual
Communication,
7
(4), 443–475. 

Postigo, Y. & López-Manjón, A. (2019). Images
in biology: are instructional criteria used in textbook image design?. International Journal of
Science
Education,
41
(2), 210–229. 

Purwaningtyas, T. (2020). Didactic
Symbol of Visual Images in EFL Textbook: Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. Pedagogy
Journal of English Language
Teaching.
8
(1), 51–63. 

Roberts, K., Norman, R., Duke, N., Morsink, P., Martin, N., & Knight, J. (2013). Diagrams,
Timelines, and Tables-Oh, My! Fostering Graphical Literacy. The Reading
Teacher,
67
(1), 12–24. 

Walden, S. (2012). Photography
and Knowledge. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism,
70
(1), 139–149. 

Weber, R. (1990). Basic
content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage. 

Wang, R. & Jiang, G. (2015). Multimodal
Foreign Language Teaching: Blending of Image and Language Resources. Journal of Schooling
Studies
12
(03), 84–90.
Yang, X. (2012). Text-image
Relations in Learner’s English-Chinese Dictionaries. Journal of University of Science and
Technology Beijing (Social Science
Edition),
28
(04),45–51.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.