Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Socio-syntax and language acquisition
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 14:1] 2014
► pp. 2645
Allen, S.E.M. & Heike Schröder
2003Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In J.W. Du Bois, L.E. Kumpf & W.J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 301–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, M.
2006The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Anderssen, M., K. Bentzen, Y. Rodina & M. Westergaard
2010The acquisition of apparent optionality: Word order in subject and object shift constructions in Norwegian. In M. Anderssen, K. Bentzen & M. Westergaard (eds.), Variation in the input: Studies in the acquisition of word order. [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 39], 241–270. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, M. & K. Bentzen
2012Norwegian object shift as IP-internal topicalization. Nordlyd 39(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, M., K. Bentzen & Y. Rodina
2012Topicality and complexity in the acquisition of Norwegian object shift. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 19(1). 39–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, M., Y. Rodina, R. Mykhaylyk & P. Fikkert
2014The acquisition of the dative alternation in Norwegian. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 21(1). 72–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, M. & M. Westergaard
2010Frequency and economy in the acquisition of variable word order. Lingua 120(11). 2569–2588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Tospråklighet og ordstilling i norske possessivkonstruksjoner. [Bilingualism and word order in Norwegian possessive constructions]. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 301. 170–197.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. & E. Lieven
2011Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, K., M. Anderssen & C. Waldmann
2013Object Shift in Mainland Scandinavian: A corpus study of Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(2). 115–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T. & I. Roberts
2012Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge occasional papers in linguistics 61. 267–294.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
2005Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.
1991Why questions? In T.L. Maxfield & B. Plunkett (eds.), Papers in the acquisition of wh: Proceedings of the Umass Roundtable, May 1990. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers.Google Scholar
Filiaci, F., A. Sorace & M. Carreiras
2014Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 825–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.D.
1998Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29(1). 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, E. van
2004Grammaticalization as economy. [Linguistik Aktuell 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, P. & K. Wexler
1994Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 251. 355–407.Google Scholar
Gordishevsky, G. & S. Avrutin
2004Optional omissions in an optionally null subject language. In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003, Vol. 11 [LOT Occasional Series 3], 187–198. University of Utrecht.
Hyams, N.
1986Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D.
1999The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lødrup, H.
2011Norwegian possessive pronouns: Phrases, words or suffixes? In M. Butt & T.H. King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG11 conference, 383–403. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Mykhaylyk, R.
2011Middle object scrambling. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 19(2). 231–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Factors contributing to child scrambling: Evidence from Ukrainian. Journal of Child Language 39(03). 553–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mykhaylyk, R., Y. Rodina & M. Anderssen
2013Ditransitive constructions in Russian and Ukrainian: Effect of givenness on word order. Lingua 1371. 271–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I.
2007Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, T.
1999Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W.
2007Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. & D. Lillo-Martin
2011Principles and parameters theory and language acquisition. In P. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 670–673. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, R.
2008Why continuity? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 261. 107–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2006Acquiring linguistic constructions. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 255–298. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Valian, V.
1990Null subjects: A problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35(2). 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 401. 21–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Ø. A.
2005Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5. 187–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldmann, C.
2008Input och output: Ordföljd i svenska barns huvudsatser och bisatser [Input and output: Word order in Swedish children’s main and embedded clauses]. Ph. D. dissertation, Lundastudier A 65, University of Lund.
2011Moving in small steps towards verb second: A case study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34(3). 331–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M.
2004The interaction of input and UG in the acquisition of verb movement in a dialect of Norwegian. Nordlyd: Tromsø working papers in language acquisition 32(1). 110–134.Google Scholar
2008aVerb movement and subject placement in the acquisition of word order: Pragmatics or structural economy? In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, P. Larranaga & J. Clibbens (eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners. [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 45], 61–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bAcquisition and change: On the robustness of the triggering experience for word order cues. Lingua 118(12). 1841–1863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009aThe Acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure and economy. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 145], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bMicrovariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1). 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009cUsage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5). 1023–1051. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Subject positions and information structure: The effect of frequency on acquisition and change. Studia Linguistica 31. 299–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The acquisition of linguistic variation: Parameters vs. micro-cues. In T. Lohndal (ed.), In search of universal grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, 275–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Complexity and conflicting grammars in language acquisition. Second Language Research 30(1). 85–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Word order and finiteness in acquisition: A study of English and Norwegian wh-questions. In K.M. Eide (ed.) Finiteness matters. On finiteness-related phenomena in natural language Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Westergaard, M. & K. Bentzen
2007The (Non-)effect of input frequency on the acquisition of word order in Norwegian embedded clauses. In I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept. [Studies on Language Acquisition], 271–306. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Word order and finiteness in the acquisition of English and Norwegian wh-questions. In K. Franich, K.M. Iserman & L.L. Keil (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 21, 457–467. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Ø. A. Vangsnes & T. Lohndal
2012Norwegian som: The complementizer that climbed to the matrix left periphery and caused verb second violations. In V. Bianchi & C. Chesi (eds.), Enjoy linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 329–343. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M. & M. Anderssen
Forthcoming. Word order variation in Norwegian possessive constructions: Bilingual acquisition and attrition. In J.B. Johannessen & J. Salmons (eds.) Germanic heritage languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change Studies in Language Variation Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Wexler, K.
1999Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillock (eds.), Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing, special issue of Lingua, 23–79. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Yang, C.
2002Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010Universal Grammar, statistics or both? In C. Yang (ed.), Language acquisition: Critical concepts in linguistics II, 128–140. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 32 other publications

Anderssen, Merete, Kristine Bentzen, Guro Busterud, Anne Dahl, Björn Lundquist & Marit Westergaard
2018. The acquisition of word order in L2 Norwegian: The case of subject and object shift. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:3  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
2018. Cross-linguistic similarities and differences in bilingual acquisition and attrition: Possessives and double definiteness in Norwegian heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:4  pp. 748 ff. DOI logo
Anderssen, Merete & Marit Westergaard
2020. Word order variation in heritage languages. In Lost in Transmission [Studies in Bilingualism, 59],  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Archibald, John
2022. Segmental and Prosodic Evidence for Property-by-Property Transfer in L3 English in Northern Africa. Languages 7:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Bukharov, V. M. & O. V. Baykova
2021. Interaction and Interference of Languages in Bilingual Germans of the Vyatka Region of Russia. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 19:2  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Enger, Hans-Olav
2022. Type frequency is not the only factor that determines productivity, so the Tolerance Principle is not enough. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 144:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Fábregas, Antonio, Merete Anderssen & Marit Westergaard
2019. A comparison of Norwegian and Spanish L1 acquisition of possessive constructions. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22:2  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Ionin, Tania
2021. Property-by-property acquisition of a second language: What transfers, under what conditions, and how does recovery from transfer proceed?. Second Language Research 37:3  pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Jamali, Maryam, Ali Akbar Jabbari & Mohammad Hasan Razmi
2023. Acquisition of attributive adjectives and noun adjuncts by L3 learners of French and German: further evidence for the typological primacy model (TPM). International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:3  pp. 851 ff. DOI logo
Kolb, Nadine, Natalia Mitrofanova & Marit Westergaard
2022. Crosslinguistic influence in child L3 English: An empirical study on Russian-German heritage bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 26:4  pp. 476 ff. DOI logo
2022. Phonological vs. natural gender cues in the acquisition of German by simultaneous and sequential bilinguals (German–Russian). Journal of Child Language 49:4  pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Kush, Dave & Anne Dahl
2022. L2 transfer of L1 island-insensitivity: The case of Norwegian. Second Language Research 38:2  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Lohndal, Terje & Michael T. Putnam
2024. Modeling multilingual grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Lundquist, Björn & Anne Dahl
2019. Introduction from our guest editors. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Mitrofanova, Natalia, Evelina Leivada & Marit Westergaard
2023. Crosslinguistic influence in L3 acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:5  pp. 717 ff. DOI logo
Mitrofanova, Natalia, Olga Urek, Yulia Rodina & Marit Westergaard
2022. Sensitivity to microvariation in bilingual acquisition: morphophonological gender cues in Russian heritage language. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
OGAWA, Yoshiki
2018. Diachronic Syntactic Change and Language Acquisition: A View from Nominative/Genitive Conversion in Japanese. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 24:2  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Putnam, Michael
2017. Feature reassembly as constraint satisfaction. The Linguistic Review 34:3 DOI logo
Putnam, Michael T.
2020. One Feature—One Head: Features as Functional Heads in Language Acquisition and Attrition. In New Trends in Language Acquisition Within the Generative Perspective [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 49],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Tanja Kupisch, Terje Lohndal & Marit Westergaard
2018. Generative Approaches to Second Language (L2) Acquisition and Advanced L2 Proficiency. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse
2021. The Full Transfer/Full Access model and L3 cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sheehan, Michelle
2021. Parameters and Linguistic Variation. In A Companion to Chomsky,  pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Velnić, Marta
2024. The acquisition of grammatical alternates: a comparison of Italian and Norwegian possessives. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 27:1 DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2015.  Complexity in child and adult language acquisition . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 541 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2019. Overgeneralization and change: The role of acquisition in diachrony. Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2020. Language Acquisition, Microcues, Parameters, and Morphosyntactic Change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics,  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2020. Attrition via acquisition: The importance of development in small steps: A Commentary on ‘A model for L1 grammatical attrition’. Second Language Research 36:2  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2021. Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research 37:3  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit, Terje Lohndal & Björn Lundquist
2023. Variable V2 in Norwegian heritage language. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit, Natalia Mitrofanova, Roksolana Mykhaylyk & Yulia Rodina
2017. Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:6  pp. 666 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit, Øystein A. Vangsnes & Terje Lohndal
2017. Variation and change in Norwegianwh-questions. Linguistic Variation 17:1  pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Wrembel, Magdalena
2021. Multilingual acquisition property by property: A view from a wider perspective. Second Language Research 37:3  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.