Lexicality judgements in healthy aging and in individuals with Alzheimer's disease
Effect of neighbourhood density
Neighbourhood density (N) has been shown to influence how lexical stimuli are accessed. In young adults, a large N is facilitatory for words but inhibitory for pseudowords in English. While there is a paucity of studies probing N as people age, results to date point towards changes in lexical processing that occur with aging. We are not aware of any studies that have sought to investigate N in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in English. Results from the lexical decision task reported here support previous N findings for young adults. However, older adults and those with AD showed a different pattern of performance. Both were slower to respond to and made more errors to high versus low N pseudowords but, unlike young adults, older adult groups showed a decrease in sensitivity to N for words. Results suggest that the aging process may change how N is processed; older individuals are no longer as sensitive to N and this appears to be further altered by AD. In the context of the multiple read-out model of lexical processing, this change may be due to a longer time required to activate lexical neighbours which, in turn, results in differential N effects for words and pseudowords.
References (45)
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 151, 802–814. 

Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4 (4), 439–461. 

Appell, J., Kertesz, A. & Fisman, M. (1982). A study of language functioning in Alzheimer patients. Brain and Language, 171, 73–91. 

Balota, D.A., Cortese, M.J., Sergent-Marshall, S.D., Spieler, D.H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (2), 283–316. 

Bayles, K.A., & Kaszniak, A.W. (1987). The brain and age-related dementing diseases. In K.A. Bayles & A.W. Kaszakniak (Eds.), Communication and cognition in normal aging and dementia. Boston, Ma: College-Hill Press.
Braun, M., Jacobs, A.M., Hahne, A., Ricker, B., Hofmann, M., & Hutzler, F. (2006). Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision. Brain Research, 10731, 431–439. 

Caza, N., & Moscovitch, M. (2005). Effects of cumulative frequency, but not of frequency trajectory, in lexical decision times of older adults and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Memory and Language, 53 (3), 456–471. 

Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119 (2), 417. 

Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duñabeitia, J.A., Marín, A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Associative and orthographic neighborhood density effects in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 23 (6), 759–764. 

Duong, A., Whitehead, V., Hanratty, K., & Chertkow, H. (2006). The nature of lexico-semantic processing deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 44 (10), 1928–1935. 

Farcnik, K., Persyko, M., & Bassel, C. (2002). The presentation of aphasia in Alzheimer disease and other neurological disorders. Geriatrics & Aging, 5 (1), 30–34.
Feldman, H.H., & Woodward, M. (2005). The staging and assessment of moderate to severe Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 65 (6 suppl 3), S10–S17. 

Feldman, H.H., Van Baelen, B., Kavanagh, S.M., & Torfs, K.E. (2005). Cognition, function, and caregiving time patterns in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease: A 12-month analysis. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 19 (1), 29–36. 

Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 121, 189–198. 

Folstein, M.F., Robins, L.N., & Helzer, J.E. (1983). The mini-mental state examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40 (7), 812. 

Forster, K.I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22 (3), 696–713. 

Garlock, V.M., Walley, A.C., & Metsala, J.L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and language, 45 (3), 468–492. 

Glosser, G., Kohn, S.E., Friedman, R.B., Sands, L., & Grugan, P. (1997). Repetition of single words and nonwords in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 331, 653–666. 

Gordon, J.K., & Kurczek, J.C. (2014). The ageing neighbourhood: Phonological density in naming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (3), 326–344. 

Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 291, 228–244. 

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103 (3), 518–565. 

Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.M. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. advances in research and theory, 22 (pp. 193–225). New York: Academic Press.
Henry, J.D., Crawford, J.R., & Phillips, L.H. (2004). Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 42 (9), 1212–1222. 

Holcomb, P.J., Grainger, J., & O’Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (6), 938–950. 

Huntsman, L.A., & Lima, S.D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(3), 289–306. 

Joubert, S., Joncas, S., Barbeau, E., Joanette, Y., & Ska, B. (2006). Cognition. In S. Gauthier (Ed), Clinical diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease, third edition (pp. 165–176). Abington: Informa Healthcare. 

Landauer, T.K., & Streeter, L.A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 119–131. 

Madden, D.J., Welsh-Bohmer, K.A., & Tupler, L.A. (1999). Task complexity and signal detection analyses of lexical decision performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16 (1), 1–18. 

McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E.M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease report of the NINCDS‐ADRDA work Group* under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 34 (7), 939–939. 

Mendiondo, M.S., Ashford, J.W., Kryscio, R.J., & Schmitt, F.A. (2000). Modelling mini mental state examination changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Statistics in Medicine, 19 (11–12), 1607–1616. 

Myerson, J., Hale, S., Chen, J., & Lawrence B. (1997). General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability. Acta Psychologica, 961, 83–101. 

Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53 (4), 695–699. 

Nebes, R.D., & Brady, C.B. (1992). Generalized cognitive slowing and severity of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for the interpretation of response-time data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14 (2), 317–326. 

Pate, D.S., & Margolin, D.I. (1994). Cognitive slowing in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s patients. Distinguishing bradyphrenia from dementia. Neurology, 44 (4), 669–669. 

Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K.S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 251, 1142–1158. 

Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19 (2), 278–289. 

Robert, C., & Mathey, S. (2007). Aging and lexical inhibition: The orthographic neighborhood frequency effect in young and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B1, 340–342. 

Sears, C.R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S.J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 211, 876–876. 

Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006). Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38 (2), 190–195. 

Snyder, L.S., Holland, A.L., & Forbes, M. (1996). Lexical decisions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Some notes on automatic versus controlled processing. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29 (5), 389–399. 

Spieler, D.H., & Balota, D.A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15 (2), 225–231. 

Stadtlander, L.M. (1995). Age differences in orthographic and frequency neighborhoods. Advances in Psychology, 1101, 72–86. 

Taler, V., Aaron, G.P., Steinmetz, L.G., & Pisoni, D.B. (2010). Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B1, 551–560. 

Taler, V., & Phillips, N.A. (2008). Language performance in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a comparative review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30 (5), 501–556. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Roumpea, Georgia, Jurij Bon, Katarina Marjanovič, Zvezdan Pirtošek & Christina Manouilidou
2023.
Facilitated lexical processing accuracy and reaction times following repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a case study.
Neurocase 29:5
► pp. 151 ff.

Azevedo, Nancy, Ruth Ann Atchley, N. P. Vasavan Nair & Eva Kehayia
Azevedo, Nancy, Gianluca U. Sorrento, Eva Kehayia, Gonia Jarema, Rachel Kizony & Joyce Fung
2019.
2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR),
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.