Complexity in linguistic theorizing
The general notion of ‘complexity’ is discussed based on foundational ideas by Herbert Simon and Nicholas Rescher. An analytic overview is provided of the ways in which language complexity has been treated in linguistic theories during the past 200 years. The Schlegel brothers, Humboldt, and Schleicher developed the first theory of complexity with their tripartition of languages into progressively complex morphological types. Humboldt also provided the principle of One Meaning – One Form (Humboldt’s Universal) which has turned out to be a widespread tendency in the simplification of morphological complexity. Jespersen’s Ease Theory has been influential in highlighting many instances of phonological change. The main contribution of Structuralism was Markedness Theory, the idea that language at all levels is built on minimal oppositions where one term (e.g. voiceless or singular) is more basic than its complex counterpart (e.g. voiced or plural). Syntactic complexity came to the fore with the theory of Immediate Constituents giving tools for measuring syntactic depth. Generative linguistics tried to measure syntactic complexity by devising Evaluation Measures based on symbol counting. Current linguistics offers a plethora of empirical studies at all levels, invoking considerations of both system, processing, and cognitive complexity.
References (66)
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation. A cross-linguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Bickerton, D. (1992). Language and species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

Blankenship, J. (1974). The influence of mode, submode, and speaker predilection on style. Speech Monographs, 411, 85–118. 

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The origins of complex language. An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chipere, N. (2003). Understanding complex sentences: Native speaker variation in syntactic competence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Chomsky, N. (1959). On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control, 21, 137–167. 

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Comrie, B. (1992). Before complexity. In Murray Gell-Mann, & John A. Hawkins (Eds.), The Evolution of human languages: Proceedings of the workshop on the evolution of human languages, held August 1989 in Santa Fe, New Mexico (pp. 193–211).Redwood, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Crystal, D. (2006). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Culicover, P.W. (2013). Grammar & complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: University Press
Deutscher, G. (2009). “Overall complexity”: A wild goose chase? In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 243–251.
Einarsson, J. (1978). Talad och skriven svenska. Sociolingvistiska studier. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap. SERIE C NR 9. Lund: Walter Ekstrand Bokförlag.
Engel, E. (1911). Deutsche stilkunst. Vienna & Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky A-G.
Everett, D. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46 (4), 621–646 

Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 681, 1–76. 

Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42 (1), 25–70. 

Hawkins, J.A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, J.A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Hockett, C. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company. 

Humboldt, W. von. (1836). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Jackendoff, R. (1999). Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (7), 272–279. 

Jakobson, R. (1932). Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charistia Guglielmo Mathesio Quinquagenario a discipulis et Circuli Linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblata (pp. 74–84). Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.
Jakobson, R. (1936). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen kasus. In Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague VI1 (pp. 240–288). Praha.
Jakobson, R. (1942). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska bokhandeln.
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language, its nature, development & origin. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Jespersen, O. (1941). Efficiency in linguistic change. Det Kgl. danske videnskabernes selskab. Historisk-filologiske meddelelser, 27 (4). København: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Karlsson, F. (2007). Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2), 365–392. 

Kinsella, A.R. (2009). Language evolution and syntactic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Kusters, W. (2003). Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Ph.D. diss., University of Leiden.
MacWhinney, B. (2009). The emergence of linguistic complexity. In Givón, & Shibatani (Eds.), 405–432.
Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bibliotheca Romanica. Manualia et Commentationes X. Berne: Éditions A. Francke S.A.
Mayerthaler, W. (1980). Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Linguistische Forschungen, 28. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
McWhorter, J. (2001). The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 51, 126–166. 

Michel, J-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., & Gray, M.K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J.B., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M.A., & Aiden, E.L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331 (6014), 176–182. 

Miestamo, M. (2008). Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, & Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), 23–42.
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., & Karlsson, F. (2008b). Introduction: The problem of language complexity. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, and Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change (pp. vii–xiv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Miller, G.A. (1987). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 171, 748–762. 

Nichols, J. (1992). Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Nichols, J. (2009). Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and a survey. In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 110–125.
Paul, H. (1920 [1886]). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Fünfte Auflage. Halle a. S.: Verlag von Max Niemeyer.
Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity: A philosophical overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (2009). Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schleicher, A. (1863). Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann Bühlau.
Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6), 467–482.
Sinnemäki, K. (2008). Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, & Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), 67–88.
Sinnemäki, K. (2011). Language universals and linguistic complexity. Three studies in core argument marking. Ph. D. diss., Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Available at: [URL]
Sinnemäki, K. (Forthcoming). Complexity trade-offs: A case study. In Frederick J. Newmeyer, & Laurel B. Preston (Eds.), Measuring linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7 (4), 263–272. 

Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647. 

Traxler, M.J. (2012). Introduction to psycholinguistics. Understanding language science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Trudgill, P. (2009). Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 98–109.
Wells, R.S. (1947). Immediate constituents. Language, 23 (1), 81–117. 

Wurzel, W.U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Studia Grammatica, 21. Berlin: Akademie-Vlg.
Yngve, V.A. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104 (5), 444–466.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Paquot, Magali
2024.
Complexity Is a “Markedly Complex Idea”—But How Complex Should It Be to Serve as a Useful Construct in Second Language Research?: A Commentary on “Complexity and Difficulty in Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical and Methodological Overview”.
Language Learning 
Säily, Tanja, Turo Vartiainen & Harri Siirtola
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.