Cover not available
Article In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2024
Edited by Marco Bril and Kristel Doreleijers
[Nota Bene 1:2] 2024
► pp. 227–243

How and why is ONE different?

 | Leiden University
ORCID logo | Leiden University
This paper argues that the word for ONE in Russian and Dutch is not a cardinal numeral but a classifier with an unvalued [Unit:_] feature. The value of this feature, e.g., [person], [gender], [place] is provided by the syntactic environment of ONE. Cardinal numerals ≥ TWO are phrasal quantifiers with a specific value for the feature [Partitioning:_]. We propose a novel structure for numeral containing nominal phrases, representing two types of classifiers, generally corresponding to count (lower classifier) and amount (higher classifier). In non-oblique environments the relation between the numeral (except for ONE) and the noun is established by a (silent) P. We show that this structure neatly captures the distinct distribution of ONE, Cardinals, and Indefinite Numerals (like veel ‘many’) with respect to the case assignment patterns and the availability of functional classifier-like nouns (Russian), as well as their cooccurrence with prepositions or diminutive morphology (Dutch).
Keywords: ONE, classifiers, Cardinals, Indefinite Numerals, Russian, Dutch, comparative morphosyntax
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Proposal
  • 3.Russian
    • 3.1How is ONE different?
    • 3.2Classifiers in non-classifier Russian
    • 3.3Two types of IndNums
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Dutch
    • 4.1Evidence for the (silent) P
    • 4.2Place ONE
    • 4.3ONE in the human group construction
    • 4.4Summary of the analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (30)
References
Barbiers, Sjef. 2005. Variation in the morphosyntax of ONE. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8(3). 159–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Indefinite numerals ONE and MANY and the cause of ordinal suppletion. Lingua 117(5). 859–880. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2006. Case and agreement with genitive of quantification in Russian. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Agreement Systems 921, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brattico, Pauli & Alina Leinonen. 2009. Case distribution and nominalization: Evidence from Finnish. Syntax 12(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 2021. Adverbial -s as last resort. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40(4). 1023–1073. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, Marijke. 2011. A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14(3). 173–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny S. 1996. Mass and count: Syntax or semantics? In Anna Arregiu & Crit Cremers (eds.), Proceedings of Meaning on the HIL, 34–52. Leiden: HIL.Google Scholar
1998. Een beetje or the “mass only” puzzle. In Sjef Barbiers, Johan Rooryck, & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Small words in the big picture, 25–30. Leiden: HIL.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 2001. On certain head-final effects in Vietnamese. In Karine Megerdoomian & Leora Anne Bar-el (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 102–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla PressGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1994. Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12(4). 597–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon, Ching-Perng Chen & Hui-Chin Tsai. 2015. Justifying silent elements in syntax: The case of a silent numeral, a silent classifier, and two silent nouns in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2(2). 193–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon, Harald Hammarström & Marc Allassonnière-Tang. 2022. Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world. Linguistics Vanguard 8(1). 151–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1987. Language and number: The emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Ora Matushansky. 2018. Cardinals: The syntax and semantics of cardinal- containing expressions. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2019. Some thoughts on one and two and other numerals. In Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation, 335–356. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khrizman, Keren. 2016. Functional unit classifiers in (non)-classifier Russian. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 11(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klockmann, Heidi. 2017. The design of semi-lexicality. Evidence from Case and Agreement in the nominal domain. Utrecht: LOT dissertation.
Leu, Thomas. 2005. Something invisible in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11(1). 143–154.Google Scholar
Mamta, Kumari. 2023. Austro-Asiatic numeration. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 6(7), 4453–4464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martí Girbau, Núria. 2010. The syntax of partitives. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda. 2023. A network of allostructions: Quantified subject constructions in Russian. Cognitive Linguistics 34(1). 67–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postma, Gertjan. 2015. Numerals in Dutch paucal constructions. The compositional nature of paucal number. (Paper presented at the SLE-Workshop on the Syntax & Semantics of Numerals, Leiden.)
Qi, Jianjun & Chuansheng He. 2019. The morphosyntax of numerals ʥi33/ʥĩ35 ‘one’ in Shuhi and implications for the semantics of numerals. Lingua 2251. 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2008. Something inner- and cross-linguistically different. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(1). 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2017. Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba. 1997. Suppletion in the derivation of ordinal numerals: A case study. In Benjamin Bruening (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Student Conference in Linguistics, 429–447. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yadroff, Michael. 1999. Formal properties of functional categories: The minimalist syntax of Russian nominal and prepositional expressions. Indiana University dissertation.