Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics

• Introduction | p. 1
• 1. Grammar and rhetoric within a functional view of language | p. 9
• 1.0 Preface
• 1.1 Grammar and rhetoric
• 1.2 Functionalism and formalism
• 1.3 Textual and interpersonal rhetoric
• 1.4 Via media: formalist functionalism
• 2. Natural language as metalanguage | p. 31
• 2.0 Preface
• 2.1 Introduction
• 2.2 Metalanguage: examples and definitions
• 2.3 The semantic representation of metareference
• 2.4 The problem of direct and indirect speech
• 2.5 The problem of semantic acceptability in reporting sentences
• 2.6 The problem of referential opacity
• 2.7 The problem of presuppositions
• 2.8 Conclusion
• 3. Metalanguage, pragmatics, and performatives | p. 59
• 3.0 Preface
• 3.1 The performative hypothesis and the pragmatic analysis
• 3.2 Indirect speech and modes of mention
• 3.3 A sketch of the pragmatic analysis
• 3.4 Comparison of the performative hypothesis and the pragmatic analysis
• 3.5 Conclusion
• 4. Language and tact | p. 79
• 4.0 Preface
• 4.1 Introduction
• 4.2 “Direct and indirect illocutions” versus “sense and force”
• 4.3 Searle's approach compared with the present one
• 4.4 Gordon and Lakoff's conversational postulates
• 4.5 Sadock's ‘extended performative hypothesis’
• 4.6 Relation between sense and force
• 4.7 Explanation of ‘indirectness’ by conversational principles
• 4.8 Recapitulation
• 4.9 The logical form (sense) of a sentence
• 4.10 The pragmatic force of a sentence
• 4.11 Negative politeness
• 4.12 The tact maxim
• 4.13 The hinting strategy
• 4.14 Pragmatic space
• 4.15 Conclusion
• Footnotes | p. 119

Cited by 46 other publications

HABIB ABDESSLEM

2001. Politeness strategies in the discourse of drama: A case study. jlse 30:2 ► pp. 111 ff.

Abdulsada, Mohammed N. & Balsam Y. Yaqoub

2022. Politeness maxims in Saad Al-Hariri’s and François Hollande’s speeches on refugees. Neophilology :4 ► pp. 733 ff.

Alcosero, Irish Rose & Dan Gomez

2022. Analysis of politeness strategies in Youtube reaction vlogs. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 11:3

Alexandropoulos, Georgios

2015. A Corpus-Stylistic Approach of the Treatises of St. Athanasius about Idolatry. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 4:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

Alexandropoulos, Georgios

2015. A Corpus-Stylistic Approach of the Treatises of Great Athanasius About Idolatry. In Modern Computational Models of Semantic Discovery in Natural Language [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 273 ff.

Alrefaee, Yasser, Bilal Zakarneh, Tribhuwan Kumar & Abdul-Qader Abdul-Ghafour

2023.  Contextual Meanings of Qur’anic Near-Synonyms and Their English Translations with Special Reference to Huzn (Grief) and Its Near-Synonyms . Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 52:5 ► pp. 477 ff.

Bar On, Sagit & Natalia Meir

2022. Requests and apologies in two languages among bilingual speakers: A comparison of heritage English speakers and English- and Hebrew-dominant bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 13

Bolinger, Dwight

1990. According to. Journal of English Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 225 ff.

Brookins, Timothy A.

2010. A politeness analysis of Catullus’ polymetric poems: Can Leech's GSP cross the ancient–modern divide?. Journal of Pragmatics 42:5 ► pp. 1283 ff.

Crystal, David

2021. Afterword. Text & Talk 41:5-6 ► pp. 833 ff.

Culpeper, Jonathan

2015. Geoffrey Leech, 1936-2014 – The pragmatics legacy. In Handbook of Pragmatics,

de Vleeschauwer, J.

1988. Fatiese kommunikasie oor kultuurgrense heen. South African Journal of Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 37 ff.

Duskaeva, Lilia

2021. Fundamentals of the Research of Speech Etiquette in Polylogic Communication of Online Communities. In Speech Etiquette in Slavic Online Communities, ► pp. 13 ff.

Feng, Zongxin

2022. The interaction and rhetorical conflict between systemic linguistics and generative linguistics. Journal of World Languages 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Ghosh, Aditi

2019. Intercultural Communication in the Multilingual Urban Workplace. In The Wiley Handbook of Global Workplace Learning, ► pp. 301 ff.

Graves, David & Ilai Alon

1994. A language for the description of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36:3 ► pp. 169 ff.

Hafner, Christoph A.

2010. A Multi-perspective Genre Analysis of the Barrister’s Opinion: Writing Context, Generic Structure, and Textualization. Written Communication 27:4 ► pp. 410 ff.

Ihnatyuk, N.А.

2003. TEACHING COURTEOUS COMMUNICATION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LESSONS. Educational Dimension 6 ► pp. 94 ff.

Istighfarna, Hanif A., Slamet Setiawan & Mister G. Maru

2023. Cause-Effect Relation in Language Use Among English Department Students Towards Their Lecturers on WhatsApp Chat. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2022 (IJCAH 2022) [Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 724], ► pp. 2030 ff.

Karandeeva, L.G. , T.G. Stanchuliak, S.V. Popova, V.S. Suyskaya & I.V. Shvedova

2022. The Prosody of Directive Speech Acts: Pragmastylistic Aspect (On the Material of the Modern German Language). International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 ► pp. 2112 ff.

Kasirzadeh, Atoosa & Iason Gabriel

2023. In Conversation with Artificial Intelligence: Aligning language Models with Human Values. Philosophy & Technology 36:2

Kizelbach, Urszula

2023. Pragmatics and the Analysis of Fiction. In (Im)politeness in McEwan’s Fiction, ► pp. 13 ff.

Kizelbach, Urszula

2024. The pragmatics of royal discourse in William Shakespeare’s Henry vi . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Kostro, Monika & Krystyna Wróblewska-Pawlak

2016. Panie Prezydencie, Monsieur le Président... Formy adresatywne w polskim i francuskim dyskursie polityczno-medialnym,

Lee-Wong, Song Mei

2022. Imperatives in requests. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 491 ff.

Leech, G.N.

1983. Pragmatics, discourse analysis, stylistics and “the celebrated letter”. Prose Studies 6:2 ► pp. 142 ff.

Mair, Christian

2015. Obituary: Geoffrey N. Leech (16 January 1936 to 19 August 2014). Corpora 10:1 ► pp. 5 ff.

Malyuga, Elena N., Alex Krouglov & Maria V. Ivanova

2020. Functional and Linguistic Features of Humour in Economic Discourse. In Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics, ► pp. 95 ff.

McTear, Michael F.

1984. Structure and Process in Children’s Conversational Development. In Discourse Development [Springer Series in Cognitive Development, ], ► pp. 37 ff.

Moldovan, Andrei

2016. Presumptions in Communication. Studia Humana 5:3 ► pp. 104 ff.

Porayska-Pomsta, Kaśka, Manolis Mavrikis & Helen Pain

2008. Diagnosing and acting on student affect: the tutor’s perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18:1-2 ► pp. 125 ff.

Porter, Joseph A.

2001. Eloquence and Liminality: Glossing Mercutio’s Speech Acts. In Romeo and Juliet, ► pp. 166 ff.

Samarah, Abdullah Yaqub

2015. Politeness in Arabic Culture. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:10 ► pp. 2005 ff.

SEYARİ, Ahmet & Murat AKTAŞ

2023. Pêşgira Dariştinê ya ‘Ve-’ yê û Fonksîyonên Wê yên Morfosemantîk di Berhemên Klasîk ên Kurmancîya Jorîn da. Kurdiname :9 ► pp. 36 ff.

Takahashi, Satomi & Herbert L. Roitblat

1994. Comprehension process of second language indirect requests. Applied Psycholinguistics 15:4 ► pp. 475 ff.

Talbot, Mary M.

1987. The pragmatic analysis of presuppositional phenomena in levinson'spragmatics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 20:1-2 ► pp. 173 ff.

Tottie, Gunnel

1987. REJECTIONS, DENIALS, AND EXPLANATORY STATEMENTS ‐ A REPLY TO FRETHEIM. Studia Linguistica 41:2 ► pp. 154 ff.

Turner, Ken

1996. The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness. Language Teaching 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Vandaele, Jeroen

2002. Humor Mechanisms in Film Comedy: Incongruity and Superiority. Poetics Today 23:2 ► pp. 221 ff.

Verdonik, Darinka

2023. Annotating dialogue acts in speech data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 144 ff.

Watts, Richard J.

2003. Politeness,

Xiang, Mingyou, Mian Jia & Xiaohui Bu

2024. Politeness and Impoliteness. In Introduction to Pragmatics [Peking University Linguistics Research, 9], ► pp. 105 ff.

Yaeger-Dror, Malcah

1997. Contraction of negatives as evidence of variance in register-specific interactive rules. Language Variation and Change 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Yu, Yang

2024. Desde verbos realizativos hasta verbos introductores del discurso ajeno: estudio contrastivo en español y chino. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 97 ► pp. 323 ff.

[no author supplied]

2004. Book Reviews. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:4 ► pp. 595 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Literaturverzeichnis. In Tragische Rhetorik, ► pp. 269 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Main BIC Subject

Main BISAC Subject