Informal Fallacies

HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027250056 (Eur) | EUR 115.00
ISBN 9781556190100 (USA) | USD 173.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027278906 | EUR 115.00 | USD 173.00
 
Google Play logo
The basic question of this monograph is: how should we go about judging arguments to be reasonable or unreasonable? Our concern will be with argument in a broad sense, with realistic arguments in natural language. The basic object will be to engage in a normative study of determining what factors, standards, or procedures should be adopted or appealed to in evaluating an argument as “good,” “not-so-good,” “open to criticism,” “fallacious,” and so forth. Hence our primary concern will be with the problems of how to criticize an argument, and when a criticism is reasonably justified.
[Pragmatics & Beyond Companion Series, 4] 1987.  x, 338 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 46 other publications

Amel, Rodica
2016. Petitio Principii. With Reference to Doxastic/Belief Dialectics. In Paradoxes of Conflicts [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 12],  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Andrade Uribe, Schumann Javier
2019. El argumento ad verecundiam en la relación médico-paciente: estudio de caso en procedimientos estéticos. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :18  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Boger, George
2005. Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?. Argumentation 19:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Bøgeskov, Benjamin Olivares, Lise Dam Rasmussen & Elvi Weinreich
2017. Between meaning and duty - leaders’ uses and misuses of ethical arguments in generating engagement. Journal of Nursing Management 25:2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Campillo, Rosa María López & José Luis Gómez Ramos
2022. Argumentation Skills for the Design of Formative Assessment Queries. In Design and Measurement Strategies for Meaningful Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Charnock, Ross
2002. L’argumentation rhétorique et l’enseignement de la langue de spécialité : l’exemple du discours juridique. ASp :35-36  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Ciobanu, Estella
2018. Introduction: The Demonic/-ised Subaltern’s In-sight. In Representations of the Body in Middle English Biblical Drama,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Crosswhite, James
1993. Being unreasonable: Perelman and the problem of fallacies. Argumentation 7:4  pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
David-Blais, Martin & Christian R. Bellehumeur
2005. La référence à l'autorité dans la conversation. Communication :Vol. 24/1  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst
2003. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, DOI logo
Farahat, Omar
2019. The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology, DOI logo
Fritz, Gerd & Thomas Gloning
2018. Chapter 4. Old and new medicine. In Historical Pragmatics of Controversies [Controversies, 14],  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Gauthier, Gilles
1994. Les fonctions argumentatives de la référence aux personnes dans le débat politique télévisé: le débat Bourassa-Parizeau d'octobre 1992. Canadian Journal of Political Science 27:3  pp. 559 ff. DOI logo
Gauthier, Gilles
1994. Referential Argumentation and its Ethical Considerations in Televised Political Advertising: The case of the 1993 Canadian Federal Election Campaign. Argumentation and Advocacy 31:2  pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Hansson, Sven Ove
2012. A Panorama of the Philosophy of Risk. In Handbook of Risk Theory,  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2024. Chapter 3. Manipulating citizens’ beliefs and emotions. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339],  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Ralph H.
1996. The need for a dialectical tier in arguments. In Practical Reasoning [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1085],  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Jovičić, Taeda
2006. The Effectiveness of Argumentative Strategies. Argumentation 20:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Lee, David Haldane
2019. Minimizing the Dangers of Air Pollution Using Alternative Facts: A Science Museum Case Study. World Medical & Health Policy 11:4  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Levi, Don S.
1994. Begging what is at issue in the argument. Argumentation 8:3  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Lucia Salvato
2023. Argumentation and the interpretation of religious texts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017. Communicative Intentions and Commitments. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
MacIntosh, J. J.
1991. Theological Question-Begging. Dialogue 30:4  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Maillat, Didier
2020. The Argument and the Honey Pot. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Maillat, Didier & Steve Oswald
2024. Chapter 2. Manipulation in exceptional times. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339],  pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, Thomas
1990. Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. By Douglas N. Walton.. Argumentation and Advocacy 27:1  pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Neuman, Yair, Michael P. Weinstock & Amnon Glasner
2006. The effect of contextual factors on the judgement of informal reasoning fallacies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59:2  pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Neuman, Yair & Erez Weizman
2003. The Role of Text Representation in Students’ Ability to Identify Fallacious Arguments. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 56:5  pp. 849 ff. DOI logo
Oswald, Steve
2011. From interpretation to consent: Arguments, beliefs and meaning. Discourse Studies 13:6  pp. 806 ff. DOI logo
Popa, Eugen Octav & Alexandru I. Cârlan
2024. Evidentiary Convincing and Evidentiary Fallacies. Argumentation DOI logo
Pérez-Echeverría, Mª Puy, Yolanda Postigo & Merce Garcia-Mila
2016. Argumentation and education: notes for a debate / Argumentación y educación: apuntes para un debate. Infancia y Aprendizaje 39:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
Ricco, Robert B.
2008. The Influence of Argument Structure on Judgements of Argument Strength, Function, and Adequacy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61:4  pp. 641 ff. DOI logo
Ricco, Robert B. & Anthony Nelson Sierra
2011. Individual Differences in the Interpretation of Commitment in Argumentation. Argumentation 25:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Tomić, Taeda
2013. False Dilemma: A Systematic Exposition. Argumentation 27:4  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Critical Discussion and the Identification of Fallacies. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Postclassical Backgrounds. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Postclassical Backgrounds. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser
2015. Rhetoric in a Dialectical Framework: Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],  pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Walton, D. N.
2006. Poisoning the Well. Argumentation 20:3  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Walton, Douglas
2001. Informal Logic, DOI logo
Walton, Douglas N.
1989. Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation. Argumentation 3:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Weinstock, Michael P., Yair Neuman & Amnon Glassner
2006. Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability.. Journal of Educational Psychology 98:2  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Šuster, Danilo
2012. Informal Logic and Informal Consequence. In Between Logic and Reality,  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2009. Tools for the Trade: Maxims and Fallacies. In I Do Solemnly Swear,  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2010. I. In A Companion to Epistemology,  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Philosophy

Philosophy

Main BIC Subject

HP: Philosophy

Main BISAC Subject

PHI000000: PHILOSOPHY / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  86027055 | Marc record