Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings

Pascual, Esther

doi:10.1075/pbns.170.04pas

Part of

Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction
Edited by Todd Oakley and Anders Hougaard
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 170] 2008
► pp. 79–107

Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings

Esther Pascual

Published online: 6 March 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.170.04pas

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Order by:

Alekseenko, Natalia Vadimovna

2021. Fictive Interaction Phenomenon in Social Advertising Discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice 14:6 ► pp. 1866 ff.

Brandt, Line

2014. Metaphor and the Communicative Mind. SSRN Electronic Journal

Cienki, Alan & Gianluca Giansante

2014. Conversational framing in televised political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 13:2 ► pp. 255 ff.

Demeter, Gusztav

2016. On discourse-motivated “sorries”. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 151 ff.

Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley

2020. “Hi, Mr. President!”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 180 ff.

Gavins, Joanna

2009. The year’s work in stylistics 2008. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 18:4 ► pp. 367 ff.

Núñez, Rafael

2015. Some Challenges in the Empirical Investigation of Conceptual Mappings and Embodied Cognition in Science Education: Commentary on Dreyfus, Gupta and Redish; and Close and Scherr. International Journal of Science Education 37:5-6 ► pp. 867 ff.

OAKLEY, TODD & VERA TOBIN

2014. The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: toward a theory of document acts. Language and Cognition 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Pan, Yun

2019. Meaning construction in interactive academic talk. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:2-3 ► pp. 414 ff.

Sullivan, Karen

2016. Silent abstractions versus “Look at me” drawings. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 87 ff.

Xiang, Mingjian

2015. Esther Pascual: Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 709 ff.

Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual

2022. Debate with zhuangzi. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 137 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47],

[no author supplied]

2023. Fictive questions in the Zhuangzi [Figurative Thought and Language, 18],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.