Part of
Speech Acts in the History of English
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176] 2008
► pp. 4584
Cited by

Cited by 37 other publications

Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Margarita Mele-Marrero
2014. Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco José Álvarez-Gil
2021. Impoliteness in women’s specialised writing in seventeenth-century English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Dawn
2012. Data retrieval in a diachronic context: The case of the historical English courtroom. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English,  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Dawn
2014. Historical Pragmatics: Evidence From The Old Bailey. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:2  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Baker, Olja
2021. Parliamentary directives in New Zealand and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Languages in Contrast 21:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Brinton, Laurel J.
2017. K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.) (2015). Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:2  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll & Claire Hardaker
2019. Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness,  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Elsweiler, Christine
2022. Gender variation in the requestive behaviour of Early Modern Scottish and English letter-writers? A study of private correspondence. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Elsweiler, Christine
2023. Modal may in requests. Journal of Historical Pragmatics DOI logo
Evans, Mel
2017. Royal language and reported discourse in sixteenth-century correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2017. Chapter 5. Quapropter, quaeso? ‘Why, for pity’s sake?’. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansó
2017. Introduction. Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2022. Self-authorizing action: Onlet me Xin English social interaction. Language in Society 51:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Jucker, Andreas
2020. Politeness in the History of English, DOI logo
King, Jeremy
2018. Chapter 6. Hasta perder la última gota de mi sangre. In Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 340],  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Kohnen, Thomas
2014. Speech acts: a diachronic perspective. In Corpus Pragmatics,  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli & Miriam A. Locher
2023. Corpus Pragmatics, DOI logo
Lanteigne, Betty
2014. Speech event analysis of seventeenth-century military protocol in Hamlet, 1.1. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15:1  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker
2021. Historical Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 687 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane & Brian Walker
2023. Fictional Dialogue. In Stylistics,  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Mele-Marrero, Margarita & Francisco Alonso-Almeida
2011. The Role of the Pronounsheandshein Seventeenth-Century Obstetric Directives*. Studia Neophilologica 83:2  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Milà-Garcia, Alba
2018. Pragmatic Annotation for a Multi-Layered Analysis of Speech Acts: A Methodological Proposal. Corpus Pragmatics 2:3  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, Sean, Dawn Archer & Jane Demmen
2020. Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:3  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Rachele De Felice & Carita Paradis
2022. Advice in Conversation, DOI logo
Recuero, Silvia Iglesias
2022. Actos directivos en la comedia burguesa de costumbres del siglo XVIII: ¿hacia patrones lingüísticos y de uso modernos? I. Formulaciones directas. Romanica Cracoviensia 22:2  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Recuero, Silvia Iglesias
2023. Actos directivos en la comedia burguesa de costumbres del siglo XVIII: ¿hacia patrones lingüísticos y de uso modernos? II. Formulaciones indirectas. Romanica Cracoviensia 23:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Reichl, Isabella
2022. Refusals in Early Modern English drama texts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Rogos-Hebda, Anna
2021. Review. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:1  pp. 749 ff. DOI logo
Schaefer, Ursula
2012. Oral practices in the history of English. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English,  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Shvanyukova, Polina
2019. Chapter 5. Promoting negative politeness in nineteenth-century England. In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299],  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017. (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Tag Eldin, Khalid
2022. Sudanese University Students’ Arabic and English Request Modifiers . مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم الانسانية والاجتماعية 19:3 DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2020. Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies 22:2  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
2022. Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Wierzbicka, Anna
2012. The history of English seen as the history of ideas: Cultural change reflected in different translations of the New Testament. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English,  pp. 434 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.