Cover not available
Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 197–220

“An astonishing season of destiny!” Evaluation in blurbs used for advertising TV series

ORCID logo
In this chapter I explore evaluation in DVD blurbs (the text on the back of DVD box sets for TV series), which promote television series to potential buyers. The approach taken to the analysis of evaluation is corpus linguistics, and this chapter reports on findings from a pilot study examining the blurbs for 50 contemporary American television series. A combination of frequency analysis and concordancing is used to examine the use of evaluation in these discourse types in terms of frequency, dispersion and functionality. The findings suggest that the discourse type of the DVD blurb is linguistically restricted – although not in terms of specific lexico-grammatical items, but rather in terms of pragmatic functions, and that it has much in common with both traditional advertising and book blurbs.
Published online: 4 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.10bed
References (44)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2003. AntMover (Version 1.0). Okayama, Japan: Okayama University of Science. <[URL]>Google Scholar
2008. AntConc (Version 3.2.2). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bateman, John A. 2008. Multimodality and Genre. A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beasley, Ron and Danesi, Marcel. 2002. Persuasive Signs. The Semiotics of Advertising. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006a “Evaluating Europe - Parameters of evaluation in the British press.” In Reconfiguring Europe - the Contribution of Applied Linguistics (British Studies in Applied Linguistics 20), Constant Leung and Jennifer Jenkins (eds), 137–156. London: BAAL/Equinox.Google Scholar
2006b. Evaluation in Media Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008. Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. “Language patterns and Attitude”. Functions of Language 16 (2): 165–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. The Language of Fictional Television. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2012. “‘Get us the hell out of here’: Key words and trigrams in fictional television series.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (1): 35–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika and Caple, Helen. 2012. News Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 2001. The Discourse of Advertising (2nd edition). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunn, Anne. 2005. “The genres of television.” Narrative and Media, Helen Fulton, Rosemary Huisman, Julian Murphet and Anne Dunn (eds), 125–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gea-Valor, Ma. Lluïsa. 2005. “Advertising books: a linguistic analysis of blurbs.” Ibérica 10: 41–41.Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard. 1997. Paratexts. Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Angela. 2002. The Language of Advertising (2nd edition). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2006. “Some proposals towards a more rigorous corpus linguistics.” ZAA 54 (2): 191–202.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2004. “Counting the uncountable: problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus.” In Corpora and Discourse, Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman (eds), 157–188. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Sinclair, John. 2000. “A local grammar of evaluation.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Kaltenbacher, Martin. 2006. “Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: the emotive and the factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of Appraisal.” In System and Corpus. Exploring Connections, Geoff Thompson and Susan Hunston (eds), 269–292. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Koester, Almut. 2010. “Building a small specialised corpus.” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy (eds), 66–79. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, David Y.W. 2007. “Corpora and discourse analysis. New ways of doing old things.” In Advances in Discourse Studies, Vijay Bhatia, John Flowerdew and Rodney Jones (eds), 86–99. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, James and White, Peter. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Hardie, Andrew. 2012. Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard and Tono, Yukio. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mason, Oliver. n.d. QTag. <[URL]>
Miller, Donna R. 1999. “Meaning up for grabs: value-orientation patterns in British parliamentary debate on Europe.” In Language and Ideology: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference,Vol. I, Jef Verschueren (ed.), 386–404. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
2002. “Ways of meaning ‘yea’ and ‘nay’ in parliamentary debate as register: a cost-benefit analysis.” In The Economy Principle in English: Linguistic, Literary, and Cultural Perspectives. Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Associazione Italiana di Anglistica, Marialuisa Bignami, Giovanni Iamartino and Carlo Pagetti (eds), 220–233. Milano: Edizioni Unicopli.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1994. Words in Ads. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2010. “Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: an overview of the project.” Corpora 5 (2): 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pounds, Gabrina. 2011. “‘This property’ offers much character and charm’: evaluation in the discourse of online property advertising.” Text & Talk 31 (2): 195–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2011. Wordsmith (Version 5.0.0.334). Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip. 2006. “Evaluative language in evaluative and promotional genres.” In Variation in Business and Economics Discourse: Diachronic and Genre Perspectives, Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, Marina Dossena and Belinda Crawford Camiciottoli (eds), 152–165. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite and Grieve, Jack. 2004. “Analyzing appraisal automatically.” Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications. Papers from 2004 AAAI Spring Symposium, 158–161. Stanford: Stanford AAAI (American Association for Artificial Intelligence) Technical Reports.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Keiko. 1994. Advertising Language. A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation: an introduction”. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
2024. Developing an annotation protocol for evaluative stance and metaphor in discourse: theoretical and methodological considerations. Text & Talk 44:2 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Peldová, Petra
2023. Emotion and opinion in online tabloids and broadsheets. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 140:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Siromaa, Maarit & Mirka Rauniomaa
2021. Stance and Evaluation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Bednarek, Monika
2017. (Re)circulating popular television. In Style, Mediation, and Change, ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Bednarek, Monika
2023. Corpus linguistics and television series: A personal reflection. TV/Series 22 DOI logo
Cruz García, Laura
2017. Evidentials and advertising: a sample study. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bednarek, Monika & Helen Caple
2015. Promotional Videos. In Values and Choices in Television Discourse, ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Su, Hang
2015. Review of Yan & Webster (2014): Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application. Functions of Language 22:1 ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Language and Characterisation in Television Series [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.