Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics and its Interfaces
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 294] 2018
► pp. 33–57

Discourse pragmatics

Communicative action meets discourse analysis

| University of Augsburg, Germany

The multifaceted and multi-layered phenomenon of discourse has been examined in diverse research paradigms, concentrating on text as the object of investigation, on the connectedness between text and society, and on the representation of discourse. All approaches share the premise that discourse is a parts-whole configuration.

This chapter argues that interlocutors perform communicative action with discourse and in discourse, delimiting discourse from context on the one hand, and from arbitrarily concatenated discursive parts on the other. Their patterned linearisation is constrained by (1) the semantics and pragmatics of the constitutive discourse units, (2) the semantics and pragmatics of the joints, metaphorically speaking, and (3) the semantics and pragmatics of discourse-as-a-whole, demonstrating that the whole is always more than the sum of its constitutive parts. The argumentation is supported by discourse-analytic and pragmatic analyses of British political discourse, demonstrating where the two paradigms meet and where they depart.

Keywords: context, contextualisation, cooperation, discourse, discourse common ground, dovetailedness, indexicality, intentionality, parts-whole, speech act
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Speech acts and higher-level illocutionary act types
    • 2.1Expositive as a higher-level illocutionary act type
    • 2.2Macro speech acts
  • 3.The structuring of discourse
    • 3.1Discourse unit and discursive glue
    • 3.2Discourse unit and sequentiality
  • 4.Doing things with words in discourse
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.03fet
References
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “I think – an English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen, 1–47. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides
2003 Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975 How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
1992 “Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and Littman and Allen.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 389–400. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola
(eds) 1999 Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Philip, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack
(eds) 1992 Intentions in Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande Robert, and Dressler Wolfgang
1981 Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
(2018) “The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis”. In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick. 85–119, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2000 “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” Text 20(4): 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Reformulation and Common Grounds.” In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 157–179. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011 “’Here is the difference, here is the passion, here is the chance to be part of a great change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse”. In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a “The Pragmatics of Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 11: 5–12.Google Scholar
2013b “Structuring of Discourse.” In Handbooks of Pragmatics. The Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Vol . 2, ed. by Marina Sbisà, and Ken Turner, 685–711. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Laurence N. Berlin
(eds) 2015 The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton-Ann, and Talmy Givón
(eds) 1995 Coherence in Spontaneous Text, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993 English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. and Gisela Redeker
(eds) 2014 The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994 Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan
1987 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
(2018) “Pragmatics vs Rhetoric: Political discourse at the Pragmatics-Rhetoric Interface”. In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick. 85–119, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel
1977 Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Interactional Bias in Human Thinking.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 221–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
1998 Approaching Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maier, Robert M., Carolin Hofmockel, and Anita Fetzer
2016 “The Negotiation of Discourse Relations in Context: Co-Constructing Degrees of Overtness.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13(1): 71–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marmaridou, Sophia
2000 Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jim R., and David Rose
2008 Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob
2001 Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2011 “Speech Acts in Context.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2002 “Speech Act Theory and the Analysis of Conversations.” In Essays in Speech Act Theory, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken, and Susumu Kubo, 239–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Fetzer, Anita
2016 “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, Eddy
2006 “The Description of Text Relation Markers in the Geneva Model of Discourse Organization.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 115– 132. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant
2000 “Activity Types, Discourse Types and Interactional Hybridity: The Case of Genetic Counseling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard, 1–27. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2002 “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1983 Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
2010 Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J.
2003 “Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans et al., 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1988 Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1980 Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
2008 Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry
2004 Text, Context, and Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George
1996 The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Drew, Paul
2018. The interface between pragmatics and conversation analysis. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2021. Chapter 2. Computer-mediated discourse in context. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 769 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Matthias Klumm
2023. The linguistic realization of continuative discourse relations in English discourse. Functions of Language 30:1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka
2021. Argumentative, Political and Legal Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 520 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane
2018. Translation studies and pragmatics. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2018. Pragmatics vs rhetoric. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Norrick, Neal R.
2018. Narrative studies versus pragmatics (of narrative). In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Pereira, Gerardine M.
2018. The interface between pragmatics and gesture studies. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. The interface between pragmatics and internet-mediated communication. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.