This chapter examines the role of production format in the linguistic realization of discourse relations in the argumentative discourse genre of commentary, distinguishing between implicitly realized discourse relations, encoded in coherence strands and lexical coherence, and overtly realized discourse relations, encoded in coherence strands and additionally signalled with discourse connectives, metadiscursive comments and non-congruently configurated theme zones. The production format comprises single-authored commentaries, monadically edited commentaries and dyadically edited commentaries. The edited texts stem from a discourse-editing task: the source text was stripped of almost all adverbials yet retained the original argumentative sequential organization and default configuration of events. The study is methodologically compositional across functional approaches to discourse grammar, discourse semantics, and discourse pragmatics. The analysis confirms that Contrast is realized overtly by default, Continuation and Explanation tend to be realized overtly in edited texts and Elaboration is realized more frequently overtly in single-authored texts.
1997 “I think – An English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen, 1–47. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides
2003Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1993English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Gruber, Helmut, and Gisela Redeker
(eds)2014The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hofmockel, Carolin, Anita Fetzer, and Robert M. Maier
2017 “Discourse Relations: Genre-Specific Degrees of Overtness in Argumentative and Narrative Discourse.” Argument & Computation 8(2): 131–151.
Kamp, Hans, and Uwe Reyle
1993From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kecskes, Istvan
2014Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan, and María de los Ángeles Gómez-González
(eds)2004A New Architecture for Functional Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maier, Robert M., Carolin Hofmockel, and Anita Fetzer
2016 “The Negotiation of Discourse Relations in Context: Co-Constructing Degrees of Overtness.” Intercultural Pragmatics. 13 (1): 71–105.
Moeschler, Jacques
2002 “Speech Act Theory and the Analysis of Conversations.” In Essays in Speech Act Theory, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken, and Susumu Kubo, 239–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roulet, Eddy
2006 “The Description of Text Relation Markers in the Geneva Model of Discourse Organization.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 115–132. Oxford: Elsevier.
Sanders, Ted
1998 “Semantic and Pragmatic Sources of Coherence: On the Categorization of Coherence Relations in Context.” Discourse Processes 24: 119–147.
Sarangi, Srikant
2000 “Activity Types, Discourse Types and Interactional Hybridity: The Case of Genetic Counseling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard, 1–27. Harlow: Longman.
Searle, John
2010Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Speyer, Augustin, and Anita Fetzer
2014 “The Coding of Discourse Relations in English and German Argumentative Discourse.” In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence, ed. by Helmut Gruber, and Gisela Redeker, 87–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Speyer, Augustin, and Anita Fetzer
2018 “ ‘Well would you believe it, I have failed the exam again’: Discourse Relations in English and German Personal Narratives.” Pragmatics in Society 9(1): 26–52.
Taboada, Maite
2006 “Discourse Markers as Signals (or not) of Rhetorical Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 567–592.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.