Ordinary science
Science journalism entails an orientation to the interests and understandings of ordinary audiences. The key challenge for journalists is to present the research reported as newsworthy and translate complex findings to understandable terms. This study examines interviews with scientific experts conducted in the Israeli current affairs program London et. Kirschenbaum, focusing on discursive strategies used by presenters to align with the interests and knowledge of their audiences. The doing of “being ordinary” emerges as a key resource for allocating the translation of scientific knowledge between expert guests and the presenters themselves. In doing so, they are shown to shift between knowers or ignorants of the topic reported in a way that reflects their public personae and their task of making science accessible and relevant. Doing ordinariness appears to involve translational, epistemic and biographic dimensions that resonate with the interactional but also broader contexts in which reporting takes place.
Article outline
- 1.Science and the public
- 2.Ordinariness and popular television
- 3.London et Kirschenbaum
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Knowledge and ignorance
- 4.2Science and common-sense
- 4.3Research and us
- 5.Life and presentation
-
Acknowledgments
-
References
-
Appendix
References
Albaek, Erik
2011 “
The Interaction Between Experts and Journalists in News Journalism.”
Journalism 12 (3):335–348.
Armon, Rony
2017a “
Interactional Alarms: Experts’ Framing of Health Risks in Live Broadcast News Interviews.”
Health Communication: 1–10.
Armon, Rony
2017b “
Radio Sensors and Electric Storms: Scientific Metaphors in Media Talks.”
Science Communication 39 (4):443–465.
Armon, Rony, and Ayelet Baram-Tsabari
2016 “
Our Findings, My Method: Framing Science in Televised Interviews.”
Public Understanding of Science 26 (8):986–1002.
Armon, Rony, Yael Barel Ben-David, and Ayelet Baram-Tsabari
2017 “
Ribosomes as Current Affairs: The science of London and Kirschenbaum (Hebrew).”
Media Frames 16:85–108.
Armon, Rony, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2017 “
Popularization in Action: Small Stories of Scientific Expertise.”
Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies Paper 216
Bailey, Simon
2013 Exploring ADHD: An Ethnography of Disorder in Early Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.
Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet, and Bruce V. Lewenstein
2017 “
Preparing Scientists to Be Science Communicators.” In
Preparing Informal Science Educators: Perspectives from Science Communication and Education, ed. by
Patricia G. Patrick, 437–471. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Barel, Yael, Ayelet Baram-Tsabari, Ran Peleg, Rony Armon, and Ayelet Raveh
2015 Towards evidence based science communication policy in Israel: Science coverage in the Israeli news media (October 2013–April 2014). Haifa: Samuel Neeman Institute for National Policy Research.
Besley, John C, and Matthew C Nisbet
2013 “
How Scientists View the Public, the Media and the Political Process.”
Public Understanding of Science 22 (6):644–659.
Bolden, Galina B.
2013 “
Unpacking “Self”: Repair and Epistemics in Conversation.”
Social Psychology Quarterly 76 (4):314–342.
Bonner, Frances
2003 Ordinary Television: Analyzing Popular TV: London: Sage.
Carranza, Isolda E.
2015 “
Narrating and Arguing: From Plausibility to Local Moves.” In
Handbook of Narrative Analysis, ed. by
Anna De Fina and
Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 57–75. Wiley: Blackwell.
Chadwick, Andrew
2013 The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Claessens, Michel
2008 “
European Trends in Scienced Communication.” In
Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices, ed. by
D Cheng,
M Claessens,
T Gascoigne,
J Metcalfe,
B Schiele and
S Shunke, 27–38. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
Clayman, Steven E, and John Heritage
2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clegg Smith, Katherine, Rachel Friedman Singer, and Elizabeth Edsall Kromm
2010 “
Getting Cancer Research Into the News: A Communication Case Study Centered on One U.S. Comprehensive Cancer Center.”
Science Communication 32 (2):202–231.
Dunwoody, Sharon, Dominique Brossard, and Anthony Dudo
2009 “
Socialization or Rewards? Predicting U.S. Scientist-Media Interactions.”
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86 (2):299–314.
Ekström, Mats, and Marianna Patrona
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
2013 “
Political Interviews in Context.” In
Analyzing Genres in Political Communication, ed. by
Urszula Okulska and
Urszula Okulska, 73–99. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
2017 “
The Construction of Ordinariness in Mediated Public Talk: Accountability of Communicative Action and the Private-Public Interface.” International Pragmatics Association Conference Belfast, July 2017.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and Susan McKay
2012 “
Just Like Home: Remediation of the Social in Contemporary News Broadcasting.”
Discourse, Context & Media 1 (1):1–8.
Furedi, Frank
2004 Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge.
Gamson, Joshua
1998 Freaks Talk Back: Tabloid Talk Shows and Sexual Nonconformity: University of Chicago Press.
Goffman, Erving
1974 Frame Analysis: An essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Haran, Joan, Jenny Kitzinger, Maureen McNeil, and Kate O’Riordan
2008 Human Cloning in the Media: From Science Fiction to Science Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Heritage, John
2012 “
The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:30–52.
Horton-Salway, Mary
2011 “
Repertoires of ADHD in UK Newspaper Media.”
Health 15 (5):533–549.
Hutchby, Ian
2006 Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Illouz, Eva
2003 Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture: Columbia University Press.
Kampf, Zohar, and Efrat Daskal
Kapon, Shulamit, Uri Ganiel, and Bat Eylon
2010 “
Goals and Design of Public Physics Lectures: Perspectives of High-School Students, Physics Teachers and Lecturers.”
Physics education 44 (5):528–535.
Leane, Elizabeth
2007 Reading Popular Physics: Disciplinary Skirmishes and Textual Strategies. Bodmin: Ashgate.
Livingstone SM and Lunt, P.
(
1994)
Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London, UK: Routledge.
London, Yaron
2014 If I Were a Pirate (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Keter.
Lunt, Peter
2008 “
Little Angels: The Mediation of Parenting.”
Continuum 22 (4):537–546.
McNair, B, M Hibberd, and P Schlesinger
2003 Mediated Access: Broadcasting and Democratic Participation in the Age of Mediated Politics. books folder vols. Luton: University of Luton Press.
Mellor, Felicity
2012 “
Is the ‘Cox Effect’ Good for Us?”
Physics World 25 (10):19.
Montgomery, Martin
2007 Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
Montgomery, Martin
2008 “
The Discourse of the Broadcast News Interview: A Typology.”
Journalism Studies 9 (2):260–277.
Nisbet, Matthew C, and Chris Mooney
2007 “
Framing Science.”
Science 316 (5821):56.
Olson, Randy
2015 Houston, We Have a Narrative: Why Science Needs Story. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Persico, Oren
2005 “
The Iron Curtain (Hebrew).”
Globes, 29/05/2005.
[URL].
Peters, Hans Peter
2013 “
Gap Between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3):14102–14109.
Peters, Hans Peter, D. Brossard, S. De Cheveigné, S. Dunwoody, M. Kallfass, S. Miller, and S. Tsuchida
2008 “
Science Communication: Interactions with the Mass Media.”
Science 321 (5886):204–205.
Quail, Christine M, Kathalene A Razzano, and Loubna H Skalli
2005 Vulture Culture: The Politics and Pedagogy of Daytime Television Talk Shows. Vol. 152: Peter Lang.
Rampton, Ben
2007.”
Linguistic Ethnography and the Study of Identities.”
Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies. Paper 43.
Reich, Zvi
2012 “
Journalism as Bipolar Interactional Expertise.”
Communication Theory 22 (4):339–358.
Rödder, Simone, and Mike S. Schäfer
2010 “
Repercussion and Resistance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelation Between Science and Mass Media.”
Communications 35:249–267.
Rosen, Giora
2006 Ombudsman: The 11th Annual Report (Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Second Television & Radio Authority.
Sacks, Harvey
1984 “
On Doing “Being Ordinary” “ In
Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by
J. M Atkinson and
J Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shattuc, Jane M.
2014 The Talking Cure: TV Talk Shows and Women: Routledge.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.
2007 “
Lay and Expert Voices in Public Participation Programmes: A Case of Generic Heterogeneity.”
Journal of Pragmatics 39 (8):1420–1435.
Thornborrow, Joanna
2015 The Discourse of Public Participation Media: From Talk Show to Twitter. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Tolson, Andrew
2006 Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press.
Tsfati, Yariv, Jonathan Cohen, and Albert C. Gunther
2011 “
The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on News About Science and Scientists.”
Science Communication 33:143–166.
Van Eperen, L., F. M. Marincola, and J. Strohm
2010 “
Bridging the Divide Between Science and Journalism.”
Journal of Translational Medicine 8:25.
Verhoeven, Piet
2010 “
Sound-Bite Science: On the Brevity of Science and Scientific Experts in Western European Television News.”
Science Communication 32 (3):330–355.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
2021.
The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse.
Intercultural Pragmatics 18:5
► pp. 605 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.