Chapter 1
Adaptability and truth
Factual statements are supposed to be necessarily ‘true’, as opposed to people’s opinions. But what is often not taken into account is the fact that statements always are by a speaker whose relationship to the truth, or command of the facts may be less evident. In particular, leaning on an understanding of ‘facts’ (in science and elsewhere) that is more attuned to the pragmatics of Gibsonian ‘affordances’ and context, the chapter argues for a renewed attention to the conditions of ‘stating’ that circumscribe the truth value of statements. Invoking such diverse authorities as Giambattista Vico, Pope Francis, and Bruno Latour, it is claimed that all speaking is an activity of ‘acting in the world’ around us, rather than merely ‘representing’ that world. This has consequences for the precept of ‘letting the facts speak for themselves’ – as it is affirmed in a deceptively simple, but essentially vacuous popular slogan.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Adaptability and scientific truth
- 1.1‘Let the facts speak’
- 1.2
A papal pragmatics
- 1.3Cognitive aspects and Piaget’s work
- 2.Truth and activity: Vico’s take
- 3.Adapting in context
- 3.1
‘Fishy’ laws
- 3.2The limits of truth
- 3.3Time and space
- 3.4The case of Alzheimer’s Disease
- 4.Adaptability and truth
- 5.
Truth and ecology: Will the twain ever meet?
-
Notes
-
References