Cover not available
Article published In:
Sex, Death & Politics: Taboos in Language
Edited by Melanie Keller, Philipp Striedl, Daniel Biro, Johanna Holzer and Benjamin Weber
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:1] 2021
► pp. 57–86

Obscene language and the renegotiation of gender roles in post-Soviet contexts

 | Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
Mat is a specific domain of Russian obscene vocabulary including words related to sexuality. The first sociolinguistic studies on mat emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union, concomitantly with the formation of Russian gender studies in the early 1990s (Tëmkina & Zdravomyslova 2003: 51). Until today, research on gender and taboo in Russian has been exiguous. Many scholars claim that the use of mat is a male prerogative (Uspenskiĭ 1994: 56, Doleschal & Schmid 2001: 274), whereas women’s use of mat is heavily sanctioned in society. Through data from a survey I carried out with 772 participants, I illustrate that mat is strongly present in women’s language use and that stereotypical gender conceptualizations are undergoing change. From the participants’ answers it emerges that discussions about the use of obscene language play a critical role in the multifaceted process of renegotiation of gender roles in post-Soviet contexts.
Keywords: sociolinguistics, Russian, mat , taboo, gender, post-Soviet, perceptual, psycholinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Mat and its place in obscene vocabulary
  • 3. Mat between mythization and censorship
  • 4.Study design
  • 5.Demographics
  • 6. Mat usage ratios
  • 7. Mat usage contexts and criteria
    • 7.1Female respondents
    • 7.2Male respondents
    • 7.3Summary
  • 8.Gender metaphors
  • 9. Mat vocabulary
  • 10.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00021.luc
References (36)
References
Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandist, Craig. 2003. The origins of Soviet sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(2). 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doleschal, Ursula & Schmid, Sonja. 2001. Doing gender in Russian: Structure and perspective. In Marlies Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 11, 253–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fjeld, Ruth E. Vatvedt, Elsa Kristiansen, Marianne Rathje, Veturlidi Oskarsson, Natalia Konstaninovskaia, Inayat Gill & Fekede Menuta. 2019. The worldwide use and meaning of the f-word. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(1). 85–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furman, Michael Douglas. 2018. Of mat and men: Taboo words and the language of Russian female punks. Laboratorium. Zhurnal Sot͡sialʹnykh Issledovaniĭ [Journal of Social Studies] 10(1). 5–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galdas, Paul Michael. 2017. Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 161. 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güvendir, Emre. 2015. Why are males inclined to use strong swear words more than females? An evolutionary explanation based on male intergroup aggressiveness. Language Sciences 501. 133–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harjus, Jannis. 2017. Perceptual variety linguistics: Jerezano speakers’ concepts and perceptions of phonetic variation in western Andalusian Spanish. Loquens 4(2). e042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1985. Slavic gods and demons. In Stephen Rudy (ed.), Selected writings. Volume VII: Contributions to comparative mythology, 3–11. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleĭmënova, Ekaterina Grigorʹevna. 2012. Ti͡uremnai͡a subkulʹtura kak osobyĭ vid sot͡sialʹnogo vzaimodeĭstvii͡a [The prison subculture as a specific type of social interaction]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo Universiteta. Filosofii͡a. Sot͡siologii͡a. Psikhologii͡a. Pedagogika 41. 33–37.Google Scholar
Kovalev, Manuela. 2014. The function of Russian obscene language in late Soviet and post-Soviet prose. Manchester: The University of Manchester dissertation.
Krefeld, Thomas & Pustka, Elissa. 2010. Für eine perzeptive Varietätenlinguistik. In Thomas Krefeld & Elissa Pustka (eds.), Perzeptive Varietätenlinguistik. Spazi Comunicativi = Kommunikative Räume, vol. 81, 9–28. Frankfurt am Main u. a.: Centre for Language and Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy 77(8). 453–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach & Mary Bucholtz (ed.). 2004. Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir Ilʹich. 1973 [1914]. Nuzhen li obi͡azatelʹnyĭ gosudarstvennyĭ i͡azyk? [Is a compulsory state language necessary?]. In Vladimir Ilʹich Lenin, Polnoe sobranie sochineniĭ [Unabridged collected works]. Moscow: Izdatelʹstvo politicheskoĭ literatury.Google Scholar
Levin, I͡uriĭ Iosifovich. 1998. Izbrannye trudy. Poėtika. Semiotika [Collected works. Poetics. Semiotics]. Moscow: I͡azyki russkoĭ kulʹtury.Google Scholar
Löckenhoff, Corinna E., Wayne Chan, Robert R. McCrae, Filip De Fruyt, Lee Jussim, Marleen De Bolle, Paul T. Costa et al. 2014. Gender stereotypes of personality: Universal and accurate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45(5). 675–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf. 2014. Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 21. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nat͡sionalʹnyĭ korpus russkogo i͡azyka [National Corpus of the Russian Language]. Available at [URL]
Niedzielski, Nancy & Dennis Preston. 2000. Folk linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2019. Education at a glance 2019. OECD indicators. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2005. Emotions and language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peri, Alexis. 2018. New Soviet woman: The post-World War II feminine ideal at home and abroad. Russian Review 77(4). 621–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis. 2005. Perceptual dialectology. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 21, 1683–1695. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezanova, Zoi͡a & Anastasii͡a Khlebnikova. 2015. Gender metaphors in Russian and English linguocultures: A comparative study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2151. 273–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheller-Boltz, Dennis. 2017. The discourse on gender identity in contemporary Russia: An introduction with a case study in Russian gender linguistics. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2020. Grammatik und Ideologie: Feminisierungsstrategien im Russischen und Polnischen aus Sicht der Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Stephen Antony. 1998. The social meanings of swearing: Workers and bad language in late imperial and early Soviet Russia. Past & Present 1601. 167–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, Karyn. 2003. Gender and swearing: A community practice. Women and Language 26(2). 22–33.Google Scholar
Tëmkina, Anna & Elena Zdravomyslova. 2003. Gender studies in post-Soviet society: Western frames and cultural differences. Studies in East European Thought 551. 51–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Gender’s crooked path: Feminism confronts Russian patriarchy. Current Sociology 62(2). 253–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timroth, Wilhelm von. 1986. Russian and Soviet sociolinguistics and taboo varieties of the Russian language (argot, jargon, slang and “mat”). München: Verlag Otto Sagner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ugolovnyĭ kodeks Rossiĭskoĭ Federat͡sii [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation] available on [URL] (last updated on 7/31/2020).
Uspenskiĭ, Boris. 1994. Mifologicheskiĭ aspekt russkoĭ ėkspressivnoĭ frazeologii [The mythological aspect of Russian expressive phraseology]. In Boris Uspenskiĭ, Izbrannye trudy [Selected writings], vol. 21, 53–128. Moscow: Gnozis.Google Scholar
. 2018. Mifologicheskiĭ aspekt russkoĭ ėkspressivnoĭ frazeologii [The mythological aspect of Russian expressive phraseology]. In Boris Uspenskiĭ, Issledovanii͡a po russkoĭ literature, folʹkloru i mifologii, 195–286. Moscow: Common place.Google Scholar