Cognition is thinking; it feels like something to think, and only those who can feel can think. There are also things that thinkers can do. We know neither how thinkers can think nor how they are able to do what they can do. We are waiting for cognitive science to discover how. Cognitive science does this by testing hypotheses about what processes can generate what doing (“know-how”).This is called the Turing Test. It cannot test whether a process can generate feeling, hence thinking — only whether it can generate doing. The processes that generate thinking and know-how are “distributed” within the heads of thinkers, but not across thinkers’ heads. Hence there is no such thing as distributed cognition, only collaborative cognition. Email and the Web have spawned a new form of collaborative cognition that draws upon individual brains’ real-time interactive potential in ways that were not possible in oral, written or print interactions.
2024. Discourse Of Dissent: Languaging Resistance And Consciousness In Subaltern Literatures – Dalit And Black. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT 12:2 ► pp. 144 ff.
Citlak, Amadeusz
2023. Brentano’s psychology and Kazimierz Twardowski School: implications for the empirical study of psychological phenomena today. Psychological Research 87:5 ► pp. 1665 ff.
2016. Scientism in the language sciences. Language & Communication 48 ► pp. 28 ff.
Szanto, Thomas
2014. How to share a mind: Reconsidering the group mind thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Theiner, Georg
2014. A Beginner’s Guide to Group Minds. In New Waves in Philosophy of Mind, ► pp. 301 ff.
de la Guía, Elena, María D. Lozano & Víctor M. R. Penichet
2011. Co-Interactive Table: A New Facility Based on Distributed User Interfaces to Improve Collaborative Meetings. In Distributed User Interfaces [Human-Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 153 ff.
Cowley, Stephen & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
2010. Thinking in action. AI & SOCIETY 25:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Gaines, Brian R.
2010. Human Rationality Challenges Universal Logic. Logica Universalis 4:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Zheng, Robert
2010. Effects of Situated Learning on Students' Knowledge Acquisition: An Individual Differences Perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
Susswein, Noah & Timothy P. Racine
2009. Wittgenstein and not-just-in-the-head cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 27:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Cowley, Stephen J.
2008. Robots – the new linguistic informants?. Connection Science 20:4 ► pp. 359 ff.
Cowley, Stephen J.
2011. Taking a Language Stance. Ecological Psychology 23:3 ► pp. 185 ff.
Cowley, Stephen J.
2013. Naturalizing language: human appraisal and (quasi) technology. AI & SOCIETY 28:4 ► pp. 443 ff.
Ligorio, M. Beatrice, Donatella Cesareni & Neil Schwartz
2008. Collaborative Virtual Environments as Means to Increase the Level of Intersubjectivity in a Distributed Cognition System. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Categorical Perception. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, ► pp. 515 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.