The paper has two related aims. One is to outline a proposal for a spatially motivated model of discourse, called Discourse Space Theory. The other is to use this framework to explore, in a relatively formalised way, the spatial basis of the conceptual complexities arising in the uses of the English progressive verb form (be+-ing). The theory utilises an abstract space in three dimensions (time, space and modality). Verb stems are associated with Aktionsart schemas; aspectual forms like the progressive are viewed as operations on these schemas. The proposal is that geometric concepts, specifically coordinate systems and vectors, can provide a motivated formalism for investigating conceptual structures generated by a human discourse processor.
2010. The conceptual structure of deontic meaning: A model based on geometrical principles. Language and Cognition 2:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Conoscenti, Michelangelo
2013. Sprinkled Metonymies in the Analysis of Political Discourse with Corpus Linguistics Techniques: A Case Study. In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688], ► pp. 258 ff.
Cristina, Grisot
2016. Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Louis de Saussure: Time: Language, cognition and reality. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:1
Gärdenfors, Peter
2024. Event structure, force dynamics and verb semantics. Language Sciences 102 ► pp. 101610 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 238 ff.
Ki-Sun Hong
2013. 영어와 한국어의 진행상. Korean Journal of Linguistics 38:4 ► pp. 1049 ff.
Saussure, Louis de
2011. 3 On Some Methodological Issues in the Conceptual/Procedural Distinction. In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives [Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, 25], ► pp. 55 ff.
Wagener, Albin
2017. Lauren Mayberry vs. 4chan’s online misogyny: A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13:2
Wieczorek, Anna E
2015. ‘Look who’s talking now’: A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse. Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.