Cover not available
Review published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 18:1 (2010) ► pp.203–210
Book review

Carla Bazzanella (ed.). Paradigmi, Rivista di critica filosofica 17
La Forza cognitiva della metafora Special Issue of. (1). 208 pp. . ISSN 1120-3404

Reviewed by
| Unversity of Genoa
Published online: 9 April 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.1.12pra
References
Aristotle
1926 The Art of Rhetoric. Translated into English by J. H. Freese. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: William Heineman – Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1973 Poetics. Translated into English by W. Hamilton Fyfe. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: William Heineman – Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, M.
1954 “Metaphor”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 551: 273–294 [Reprinted in Black, M. 1962 Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 25–47].Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H.
1960 Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie. Bonn: Bouvier und Co.Google Scholar
Conte, M. -E.
1988 Condizioni di coerenza. Florence: La Nuova Italia [New edition by M. B. Garavelli, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso].Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1957 Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontanier, P.
1968 Les figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion. Contains: Manuel classique pour l’étude des tropes (1821 4th edition 1830) and Traité général des figures de discours autres que les tropes (1827).Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. and Tendahl, M.
2006 “Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics”. Mind & Language 21(3): 379–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, G.
1999 “La notion d’emploi dans le traitement automatique”. La pensée et la langue, Wydawnictwo Naukowe 11: 24–35.Google Scholar
Kahnemann, D. and Tversky, A.
1979 “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”. Econometrica 471: 263–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S.
1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea: Green Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Lakoff, J. and Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Kövecses, Z.
1987: “The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English”. In D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prandi, M.
2004 “Conceptual conflict and metaphor”. In S. Arduini (ed), Metaphors. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 81–117.Google Scholar
2005 “From conceptual conflict towards analogy”. In A. Baicchi, C. Broccias, and A. Sansò (eds), Modeling Thought and Constructing Meaning. Cognitive Models in Interaction. Milan: Franco Angeli, 185–197.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P.
1975 La métaphore vive. Paris: Editions du Seuil [English trans 1978 The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press].Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
1986 Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vailati, G.
1972 Scritti filosofici. Naples: Fulvio Rossi.Google Scholar
2000 Il metodo della filosofia. Saggi di critica del linguaggio. Bari: Graphis.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H.
1958 “Münze und Wort. Untersuchungen an einem Bildfeld”. In Romanica. Festschrift Rohlfs. Halle: Niemeyer, 508–521.Google Scholar
1964 “Typen der Gedächtnismetaphorik”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 91: 23–26.Google Scholar
Welby, V.
1985 Significs and Language, and other Essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Carston, R.
2006 “Metaphor, relevance, and the ‘emergent property issue’”. Mind & Language 21(3): 404–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Windelband, W.
1894 “Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft”. In Das Stiftungsfest der Kaiser-Wil-helms-Universität. Strasbourg: Universitätsbuchdruckerei Heitz & Mündel [Reprinted in Windelband, W. 1915 Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, Vol. 21. Tübingen: Mohr, 136–160].Google Scholar