Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp.203–275

Is up always good and down always bad?

From linguistic to conceptual orientational metaphors in Arabic

| Ain Shams University in Cairo | The British University in Egypt (BUE)

The current study investigates Arabic orientational metaphors in Modern Standard Arabic. Specifically, it is a corpus-based study that tries to retrieve conceptual orientational metaphors of up-down, front-back, right-left, and central-peripheral spatial orientation. The study assumes that every orientation can be described using a set of different lexemes, and these lexemes express different linguistic orientational metaphors with different levels of usage frequency. It is hypothesized that studying the relationships between these lexemes, their etymologies, and frequency can provide a detailed, integrative account of metaphorical aspects and conceptual systems related to each spatial orientation. A bottom-up methodology to identify metaphorical usages of spatial lexemes was applied to the Stanford Arabic Corpus. The results list the spatial linguistic metaphors comprising conceptual metaphors and show for each orientation that mapping orientations onto conceptual metaphors is a complicated process, which integrates linguistic and cognitive levels. The cognitive-perceptual and cultural implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords: metaphors, cognitive linguistics, Arabic, lexical networks
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Orientational metaphors
  • 3.Basic questions and hypotheses
  • 4.Methodology and procedures
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1 up-down
    • 5.2 front-back
    • 5.3 right-left
    • 5.4 center-periphery
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1 up-down spatial orientation
    • 6.2 front-back spatial orientation
    • 6.3 right-left spatial orientation
    • 6.4 center-peripheral spatial orientation
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18006.tah
References
De la Fuente, Juanma, Julio Santiago, Antonio Roman, Cristina G. Dumitrache & Daniel Casasanto
2014 When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science 251. 1682–1690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Ted E.
1993 Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 191. 61–74.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan
2008 Corpora and collocations. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 1212–1248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2016 Ontological and orientational metaphors in Latin. In William Michael Short (ed.), Embodiment in Latin semantics, 115–140. New York: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
2006 WordNet(s). In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn, 665–700. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
(ed.) 2008 The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond & Ana Cristina Macedo
2010 Metaphor and embodied cognition. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 261. 679–700. [URL]>(18 November 2017) doi:  DOI logo
Green, Spence & Christopher Manning
2010 Better Arabic parsing: Baselines, evaluations, and analysis. In COLING ’10 Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 394–402. Beijing, China; August 23–27.Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew
. UCREL Significance Test System. Lancaster University. Available at [URL] (23 November 2017).
Hong, Tian, Xianyou He, Richard Tillman, Xueru Zhao & Yumei Deng
2017 The vertical and horizontal spatial-temporal conceptual metaphor representation of Chinese temporal words. Psychology 81. 1679–1692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Fabian
2016 Metaphor and spatial conceptualization: Observation on orientational metaphors in Lycophron’s Alexandra. In Fabian Horn & Cilliers Breytenbach (eds.), Spatial metaphors: Ancient texts and transformations, 85–102. Berlin: Topoi.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bŭsta, Miloš Jacubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel
2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 11. 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolesnikova, Olga
2016 Survey of word co-occurrence measures for collocation detection. Computacion Y Sistema 201. 327–344.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science 41. 773–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2003 Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asif, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson
2004 Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 81. 104–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matta, Hilda
2016 Orientational metaphors in English, German, and Egyptian-Arabic: A comparative study with comments on the underlying theoretical basis. A paper presented in The Metaphors: Retrospect and Prospects Conference . Genoa, Italy. May 22.
Pragglejaz Group
2007 MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor & Symbol 221. 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena & Zsófia Demjen
(eds.) 2017 The Routledge handbook of metaphors and language. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speer, Robert & Catherine Havasi
2012 Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012).
Steen, Gerard J.
2017 Identifying metaphors in language. In Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjen (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphors and language, 73–87. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr & Trijntje Pasma
2010 A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006 Words and their metaphors: A corpus based approach. In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan T. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based approach to metaphors and metonymy, 63–105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tissari, Heli
2017 Corpus-linguistics approaches to metaphor analysis. In Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjen (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphors and language, 117–130. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

LI, HENG
2021. Time heals all wounds: analysis of changes in temporal focus and implicit space–time mappings among survivors of the 2019 China earthquake over time. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 595 ff. DOI logo
Li, Heng
2022. Worrying about your future. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:1 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.