Cover not available
Article published In:
The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 86–121

Acceptability and diffusion of luxury Anglicisms in present-day Romanian

| The ‘Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti’ Institute of Linguistics, the Romanian Academy
| The ‘Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti’ Institute of Linguistics, the Romanian Academy

In the context of the current heated debate surrounding the pervasive influence of the English language and Anglo-American culture on other languages, as well as the widespread purist attitude towards some contact-induced language change phenomena, both abroad and in Romania, our article discusses the situation of English lexical borrowings in present-day Romanian, focusing on the perception and processing of the so-called luxury Anglicisms (Sections 2 and 3) by young Romanian native speakers, in an attempt to see whether such an analysis can help clarify their acceptability and diffusion across our target population. We propose an alternative cognitive, psycholinguistic approach to the study of contact-induced lexical borrowings, aiming to show that there is no difference in the young Romanian native speakers’ processing of sentences containing luxury Anglicisms and their established Romanian counterparts. Such findings may support our claim that the acceptability and diffusion of such Anglicisms are pervasive across our target population, even if the official position generally condemns such uses, considering them gratuitous and a burden in communication, even making it unintelligible sometimes.

Our analysis starts from the observation that most (but not all) Romanian academics, whether linguists or not, tend to embrace a purist attitude, while on the other hand young Romanians accept such Anglicisms and tend to use them extensively. In fact, such uses are not limited to young people, who have been the subjects of our research, but are the ‘norm’ in daily conversations and elsewhere across the general population (Stoichițoiu Ichim 2006). Thus, there seems to be a gap between the actual acceptability and diffusion of luxury Anglicisms among Romanians and the ‘official’ recommendations. Based on the results of a sensicality task, meant to show how 188 Romanians, aged 18–22, process and perceive sentences with or without luxury Anglicisms (see Section 6), we will try to show that luxury Anglicisms are accepted and, by recurrent use, diffused among the Romanian community. For a more accurate picture of their diffusion, the findings will be further correlated with data from CoRoLa, the only official corpus of present-day Romanian (beginning 1989) made available under the auspices of the Romanian Academy, as well as a corpus currently in the making, and the Internet (see Section 7).

Besides showing that luxury Anglicisms cannot really be blamed for burdening or impairing processing, and thus communication, and explaining why such uses should not be censured or disapproved, we hope that our study of acceptability and diffusion will demonstrate that we are dealing with a complex, multi-layered phenomenon that can be better understood by going beyond a diachronic and synchronic analysis of particular words and a frequency count, and should incorporate more experimental data.

Last but not least, we suggest that, on the practical side, such experimental studies as the one described here could be used as an additional criterion for the lexicographic inclusion of lexical borrowings.

Keywords: luxury lexical Anglicisms, present-day Romanian, linguistic purism, psycholinguistic experiment, acceptability, diffusion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Anglicisms in present-day Romanian: A brief overview
  • 3.Necessary vs. luxury Anglicisms: A few considerations
  • 4.Embracing Anglicisms: Acceptability and diffusion
  • 5.The experiment
    • 5.1Stimuli
    • 5.2Design
    • 5.3Subjects
  • 6.Data analysis and interpretation
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Dictionaries
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18007.nic
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2012 English ‘on top’: Discourse functions of English resources in the German mediascape. Sociolinguistic Studies 6(2). 209–238.Google Scholar
Assche, Eva van, Wouter Duyck & Robert J. Hartsuiker
2016 Context effects in bilingual sentence processing: Task specificity. In Roberto R. Heredia, Jeanette Altarriba & Anna B. Cieślicka (eds.). Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research, 11–31. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avram, Mioara
1997 Anglicismele în limba română actuală. [Anglicisms in present-day Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphaele
2015 Googling Toubon: Testing the effects of institutional French language purism. In Jocelyne Daems, Eline Zenner, Kris Heylen, Dirk Speelman & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Change of paradigms – New paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics, 275–293. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, retrieved from [URL] on 1 August 2018.
Cenac, Oana Magdalena
2004 Anglicismele în sistemul financiar-bancar românesc [Anglicisms in the Romanian financial and banking system]. Analele Universității Dunărea de Jos Galați [The Annals of the University Dunărea de Jos Galați] 131. 36–41.Google Scholar
Chesley, Paula & Harald R. Baayen
2010 Predicting new words from newer words: Lexical borrowing in French. Linguistics 48(4). 1343–1374.Google Scholar
Ciobanu, Georgeta
2006 Dinamica adaptării elementului englez în limba română [The dynamics of assimilation of the English element in Romanian]. In Marius Sala (ed.), Studii de gramatică şi de formarea cuvintelor. În memoria Mioarei Avram [Grammar and word formation studies. In memory of Mioara Avram], 57–67. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Ilinca, Victoria Popovici & Ariadna Ștefănescu
2002 Romanian. In Manfred Görlach (ed.), English in Europe, 168–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croitor, Blanca, Andreea Dinică, Adina Dragomirescu, Isabela Nedelcu, Irina Nicula, Alexandru Nicolae, Carmen Vasile, Marina Rădulescu Sala & Rodica Zafiu
2008 Eşti cool şi dacă vorbeşti corect [You are cool even if you speak correctly]. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic Gold.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
2003 English as a global language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Steven N.
2012 A History of the Spanish lexicon: A linguistic perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Étiemble, René
1964 Parlez-vous franglais? [Do you speak franglais?]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fischer, Roswitha & Hanna Pułaczewska
2008 Anglicisms in Europe: Linguistic diversity in a global context. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
Furiassi, Cristiano, Virginia Pulcini & Félix Rodríguez González
(eds) 2012 The Anglicization of European lexis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furiassi, Cristiano & Henrik Gottlieb
(eds.) 2015 Pseudo-English: Studies on false Anglicisms in Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2016 Entrenchment as onomasiological salience. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (Language and the Human Lifespan Series), 153–174. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
(ed.) 2001 A dictionary of European anglicisms: A usage dictionary of anglicisms in sixteen European languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002 English in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guilbert, Louis
1975 La creativité lexicale [Lexical creativity]. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre
1965 Les mots étrangers [Foreign words]. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Hristea, Theodor
1995 Ortografia și ortoepia neologismelor românești (cu specială referire la împrumuturile recente) [The correct spelling and pronunciation of Romanian neologisms (with special reference to recent loanwords)]. Limbă și literatură [Language and literature] XL(2). 36–53.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Sylwester
2014 Contact-induced changes in Polish morphology. In Amei Koll-Stobbe & Sebastian Knospe (eds.), Language contact around the Globe: Proceedings of the LCTG3 conference, 25–45. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Konieczna, Ewa
2012 Lexical blending in Polish: A result of the internationalisation of Slavic languages. In Vincent Renner, François Maniez, & Pierre J. L. Arnaud (eds.), Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending, 51–73. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000 Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge/Mass. & London: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol
2002 Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niculescu-Gorpin, Anabella-Gloria
2013 Influenţe cultural-lingvistice asupra evoluţiei recente a limbii române în context european şi mondial [Cultural and linguistic influences on the recent evolution of the Romanian language in a European and worldwide context]. Bucharest: Editura Muzeului Naţional al Literaturii Române.Google Scholar
2014 Use and abuse of borrowings in the Romanian print media. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique [Romanian Review of Linguistics] LIX(4). 91–102.Google Scholar
Niculescu-Gorpin, Anabella-Gloria & Monica Vasileanu
2016a Romanian lexical Anglicisms: Norms and usage, speakers’ attitudes and official recommendations. Romania Orientale XXIX1. 57–67.Google Scholar
2016b How speaker attitudes are changing present-day Romanian: A socio-linguistic overview, presented at ICS-1 – The 1st International Conference on Sociolinguistics: Insights from Superdiversity, Complexity and Multimodality, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary, September 1–3, 2016.
2017 Perception and processing of context-dependent Anglicisms across the age groups (extended abstract). In Valerie Hazan (ed.), SPPL 2017 – Workshop on Speech Perception and Production across the Lifespan (University College London, 26–27 April 2017), 84–86. [URL] (1 December 2017.)
Onysko, Alexander
2009 Divergence with a cause? The systemic integration of anglicisms in German as an indication of the intensity of language contact. In Falco Pfalzgraf (ed.), Englischer Sprachkontakt in den Varietäten des Deutschen/English in contact with varieties of German, 53–74. Frankfurt am Main & New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Onysko, Alexander & Esme Winter-Froemel
2011 Necessary loans – luxury loans? Exploring the pragmatic dimension of borrowing. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1550–1567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo & Ana Celia Zentella
2012 Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacea, Otilia
2005 Neologismele comunicării electronice. Studiu de caz [Neologisms in electronic communication]. Studii și Cercetări Lingvistice [Linguistic Studies and Research] LVI (1–2). 191–198.Google Scholar
Petuhov, Nicoleta
2002 Influenţa engleză asupra limbii române actuale: Terminologia publicitară [English influence on present-day Romanian: Advertising terminology]. Limba Română [Romanian Language] LI(1–3). 27–35.Google Scholar
Pulcini, Virginia
1994 The English language in Italy. English Today 40(10). 49–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pușcariu, Sextil
1940 Limba română: Privire generală [The Romanian language: An overview]. Bucharest: Fundația pentru literatură și artă Regele Carol I.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Gonzalez, Felix
1999 Anglicisms in contemporary Spanish. An overview. Atlantis XXI1. 103–139.Google Scholar
Rohde, Ada, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Suzanne Kemmer
1999 Loanwords in a usage-based model. In Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle & Aaron M. Griffith (eds.), Papers from the Thirty-Fifth Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part 1: Papers from the Main Session, 265–275. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Roig-Marín, Amanda
2017 The Anglicisation of word formations: Cross-linguistic blends in Spanish. English Today 33(4). 50–56. DOI logo (20 December 2017).Google Scholar
Sala-Rădulescu, Marina
2007 Despre adaptarea unor anglicisme în limba română [On the assimilation of some Anglicisms in Romanian]. Studii și Cercetări Lingvistice [Linguistic studies and research] LVIII(1). 175–185.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Casas, Rosa & José García-Albea
2005 The representation of cognate and non-cognate words in bilingual memory: Can cognate status be characterized as a special kind of morphological relation? In Judith F. Kroll & Annette M. B. de Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 226–250. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.Google Scholar
Saugera, Valérie
2017 Remade in France: Anglicisms in the lexicon and morphology of French. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Șimon, Simona
2016 Necessary and luxury English loanwords in some Romanian online newspapers and magazines. In Daniel Dejica, Gyde Hansen, Peter Sandrini & Iulia Para (eds.), Language in the digital era: Challenges and perspectives, 29–36. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (15 December 2017) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana
2000 Stratageme comunicaționale și manipularea [Communicative strategies and manipulation]. Iași: Polirom.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd rev. edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Squires, Nick
2017 Italian is under assault from rising number of Anglicisms, sloppy use of verbs and shrinking vocabulary, guardians of the language warn. The Telegraph, 17.01.2017. [URL] (1 December 2017)
Stoichițoiu Ichim, Adriana
2001 Vocabularul limbii romane actuale: dinamică, influență, creativitate [The vocabulary of present-day Romanian: Dynamics, influences, creativity]. Bucharest: Editura ALL.Google Scholar
2006 Aspecte ale influenței engleze în româna actuală [Features of the English influence in present-day Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Universității din Bucharest.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Ernst
1913 Die alemannischen Lehnwörter in den Mundarten der französischen Schweiz [Alemmanic loanwords in the dialects of French Switzerland]. Basel: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei Friedrich Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Thody, Philip Malcolm Waller, Howard Evans & Michelle Pepratx-Evans
1995 Le Franglais: Forbidden English, forbidden American: Law, politics, and language in contemporary France: A study in loan words and national identity. London, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Athlone.Google Scholar
Topală, Dragoş Vlad
2006 Aspecte morfologice ale anglicismelor din limba română actuală (genul şi numărul) [Morphological features of Anglicisms in present-day Romanian: gender and number]. In Marius Sala (ed.). Studii de gramatică şi de formarea cuvintelor. În memoria Mioarei Avram [Grammar and word formation studies. In memory of Mioara Avram], 425–433. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Vakareliyska, Cynthia M. & Vsevolod Kapatsinski
2014 An Anglo-Americanism in Slavic morphosyntax: Productive [N[N]] constructions in Bulgarian. Folia Linguistica 48(1). 277–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasileanu, Monica
2016 Speakers’ attitude vs. official attitude: The case of Romanian Anglicisms. Presented at INPRA 2016 – The 7th International Conference on Intercultural Pragmatics and Communication. University of Split. Split, Croatia, June 10–12, 2016.
Veisbergs, Andrejs
2006 Systemic and structural changes in Latvian as a result of recent English influence. Journal of Baltic Studies 37(4). 467–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, James
2015 False Anglicisms in French: A measure of their acceptability for English speakers. In Christiano Furiassi & Henrik Gottlieb (eds.), Pseudo-English: Studies on false Anglicisms in Europe, 159–174. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Zenner, Eline, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
2013 Cognitive Sociolinguistics meets loanword research: Measuring variation in the success of anglicisms in Dutch. In Laura A. Janda (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn. The essential reader, 251–294. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Dictionaries

D. Calc.
= Ban, Marcel-Teodor, Manuel Miclea, Alin-Tavi Mireştean & Cristian Miclea 1994 Dicţionar explicativ de calculatoare englez-român şi român-englez [Romanian – English, English – Romanian explanatory dictionary for computing]. Bucharest: Editura Tehnică.Google Scholar
D. Ec. Piață
= Bușe, Georgeta, Spiridonia Crăiete & Silvia Bârsan 1994 Dicţionarul complet al economiei de piaţă [The complete dictionary of market economy]. Bucharest: Informaţia Business Books.Google Scholar
DEX-S
= Coteanu, Ion, Ion Dănăilă & Nicoleta Tiugan (eds.) 1988 Supliment la Dicţionarul explicativ al limbii române [Supplement to the explanatory dictionary of the Romanian language]. The “Iorgu Iordan” Institute of Linguistics, Romanian Academy. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.Google Scholar
DEX 2009/2016
= Coteanu, Ion (ed.) 2009/2016 Dicţionarul explicativ al limbii române [The explanatory dictionary of the Romanian language]. 2nd rev. edn. The “Iorgu Iordan – Al. Rosetti” Institute of Linguistics, Romanian Academy. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic Gold.Google Scholar
DEXI
= Dima, Eugenia (ed.) 2007 Dicţionar explicativ ilustrat al limbii române [The illustrated dictionary of Romanian]. Chişinău: Arc & Gunivas.Google Scholar
D. Market
. = Frone, Florin D. 1999 Dicţionar de marketing [Marketing dictionary]. Bucharest: Editura Oscar Print.Google Scholar
NDU
= Oprea, Ioan, Carmen-Gabriela Pamfil, Rodica Radu & Victoria Zăstroiu 2006 Noul dicţionar universal al limbii române [The new universal dictionary of Romanian]. Bucureşti/Chişinău: Litera Internaţional.Google Scholar
D.Ec.
= Streinu, Anca 2000 Dicționar de economie [Dictionary of economics]. Bucharest: Editura Niculescu.Google Scholar
DOOM-2005
= Vintilă-Rădulescu, Ioana (ed.) 2005 Dicţionarul ortografic, ortoepic şi morfologic al limbii române [The orthographic, orthoepic and morphological dictionary of Romanian], 2nd rev. edn. Bucharest: [Editura] Univers Enciclopedic.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kunch, Zoriana, Oksana Mykytyuk, Liliia Kharchuk & Myroslava Hnatyuk
2023. Lexical Norms in Business, Informal and Internet Communication. In Developments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications [Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 466], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.