Cover not available
Article published In:
Writing and the Mind
Edited by David R. Olson and Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 21:3] 2013
► pp. 431–447

Literacy and the languages of rationality

| University of Toronto

Literacy, specifically the use of writing for rational purposes, adds a new dimension to the traditional problem of the relation between language, thought and rationality. Central to rational thought are the logical relations expressed by such terms as “is”, “or”, “and” and “not”. Whereas some see these concepts as fundamental and innate, it is here argued that such terms exhibit a diverse range of uses in speech and thought but through literacy and education they become explicit objects of thought and formalized or ‘normed’ into logical operators as part of a literate rationality. This more formal orientation to language is seen as metarepresentational and may be shown to have both an historical and a developmental trajectory.

Keywords: truth, meaning, literacy, logic, rationality
Published online: 24 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.3.01ols
References
Adams, M.J
1990 Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok E. and Craik F.I.M
2009 “Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1): 19–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
1986 Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 621: 384–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing”. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braine, M.D. and Rumain, B
1981 “Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 311: 46–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R
2000 Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caines, M
2009, May 15. “Arrange one’s face: Review of H. Mantel’s ‘Wolf Hall’”. Times Literary Supplement. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Chartier, R
1995 Forms and Meanings. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, A
2008 Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. and Khlentzos, D
2010 “The logic instinct”. Mind and Language 251: 30–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, M
1978 Children’s Minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. and Teborsky, A
1982 Literacy Before Schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Fleming, J.D
2007 “Making sense of science and the literal: Modern semantics and early modern hermeneutics”. In K. Killeen and P.J. Forshaw (eds), The Word and the World: Biblical Exegesis and Early Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J
1975 The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Ford, W.G
1976 The Language of Disjunction. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar
French, L. and Nelson, K
1985 Young Children’s Understanding of Relational Terms. New York: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadamar, H.-G
1975 Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Mrs
1948 Mary Barton. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Goody, J. and Watt, I
1963 “The consequences of literacy”. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5(3): 304–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P
1989 Studies in the Ways with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hallidy, M.A.K
1985 Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R
2009 Rationality and the Literate Mind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halverson, J
1991 “Olson on literacy”. Language in Society 201: 619–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilton, D.J
1995 “The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment”. Psychological Bulletin 1181: 48–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.P
2006 “The challenges of segmenting spoken language”. In J. Gippert, N.P. Himmelmann, and V. Mosel (eds) Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 253–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Homer, B. and Olson, D.R
1999 “Literacy and children’s conception of words”. Written Language and Literacy 2(1): 113–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A
1996 “On the reality of cognitive illusions”. Psychological Review 103(3): 582–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leezenberg, M
2001 Contexts of Metaphor. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy-Bruhl, L
1926 How Natives Think. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Locke, J
1961 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Dent. (Original work published 1690)Google Scholar
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., and Petersen, O.P
1988 “Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children”. Reading Research Quarterly 231: 263–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luria, A
1976 Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J
1986 A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M
1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Noveck, I.A
2001 “When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigation of scalar implicatures”. Cognition 781: 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R
1977 “From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing”. Harvard Educational Review 47(3): 257–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997 “The written representation of negation”. Pragmatics and Cognition 51: 235–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Narrative, cognition and rationality”. In J.P. Gee and M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 604–615.Google Scholar
Olson, D.R. and Astington, J.W
(2013) “Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth”. First Language 331: 617–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R. and Oatley, K
2014 “Literacy and thought: The quotation theory of writing”. Written Communication 311: 4–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J
2003 “Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic-pragmatic interface”. Cognition 86(3): 253–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J
1962 The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, J
2007 Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. and Uccelli, P
2009 “The challenge of academic language”. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 112–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprat, T
1966 In J.I. Cope and H.W. Jones (eds), History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. St. Louis: Washington University Press. (Original work published in 1667).Google Scholar
Stanovich, K
1999 Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E
2009 What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L
1962 Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yuill, N
2009 “The relation between ambiguity understanding and metalinguistic discussion of joking riddles in good and poor comprehenders: Potential for intervention and possible processes of change”. First Language 291: 65–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hambye, Philippe
2017. Langues et discours comme objets sociologiques : une illustration en sociologie de l’éducation. Langage et société N° 160-161:2 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Olson, David R.
2022. Two cheers for literacy: Walter Ong, President Trump and the literate mind. Explorations in Media Ecology 21:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.