Article published in:
Writing and the Mind
Edited by David R. Olson and Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 21:3] 2013
► pp. 431447
References

References

Adams, M.J.
1990Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok E. and Craik F.I.M.
2009 “Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1): 19–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
1986Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62: 384–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing”. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 75–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M.D. and Rumain, B.
1981 “Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 46–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R.
2000Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caines, M.
2009, May 15. “Arrange one’s face: Review of H. Mantel’s ‘Wolf Hall’”. Times Literary Supplement. Retrieved from http://​www​.the​-tls​.co​.uk​/tls​/public​/article758550​.ece.Google Scholar
Chartier, R.
1995Forms and Meanings. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A.
2008Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. and Khlentzos, D.
2010 “The logic instinct”. Mind and Language 25: 30–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, M.
1978Children’s Minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. and Teborsky, A.
1982Literacy Before Schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Fleming, J.D.
2007 “Making sense of science and the literal: Modern semantics and early modern hermeneutics”. In K. Killeen and P.J. Forshaw (eds), The Word and the World: Biblical Exegesis and Early Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, 45–60.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.
1975The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Ford, W.G.
1976The Language of Disjunction. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar
French, L. and Nelson, K.
1985Young Children’s Understanding of Relational Terms. New York: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gadamar, H.-G.
1975Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Mrs
1948Mary Barton. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Goody, J. and Watt, I.
1963 “The consequences of literacy”. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5(3): 304–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1989Studies in the Ways with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hallidy, M.A.K.
1985Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R.
2009Rationality and the Literate Mind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Halverson, J.
1991 “Olson on literacy”. Language in Society 20: 619–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, D.J.
1995 “The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment”. Psychological Bulletin 118: 48–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.P.
2006 “The challenges of segmenting spoken language”. In J. Gippert, N.P. Himmelmann, and V. Mosel (eds) Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 253–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Homer, B. and Olson, D.R.
1999 “Literacy and children’s conception of words”. Written Language and Literacy 2(1): 113–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.
1996 “On the reality of cognitive illusions”. Psychological Review 103(3): 582–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leezenberg, M.
2001Contexts of Metaphor. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levy-Bruhl, L.
1926How Natives Think. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Locke, J.
1961An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Dent. (Original work published 1690)Google Scholar
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., and Petersen, O.P.
1988 “Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children”. Reading Research Quarterly 23: 263–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A.
1976Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J.
1986A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M.
1964Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Noveck, I.A.
2001 “When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigation of scalar implicatures”. Cognition 78: 165–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R.
1977 “From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing”. Harvard Educational Review 47(3): 257–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997 “The written representation of negation”. Pragmatics and Cognition 5: 235–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Narrative, cognition and rationality”. In J.P. Gee and M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 604–615.Google Scholar
Olson, D.R. and Astington, J.W.
(2013) “Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth”. First Language 33: 617–627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R. and Oatley, K.
2014 “Literacy and thought: The quotation theory of writing”. Written Communication 31: 4–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J.
2003 “Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic-pragmatic interface”. Cognition 86(3): 253–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J.
1962The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, J.
2007Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. and Uccelli, P.
2009 “The challenge of academic language”. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 112–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sprat, T.
1966 In J.I. Cope and H.W. Jones (eds), History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. St. Louis: Washington University Press. (Original work published in 1667).Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.
1999Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E.
2009What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1962Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yuill, N.
2009 “The relation between ambiguity understanding and metalinguistic discussion of joking riddles in good and poor comprehenders: Potential for intervention and possible processes of change”. First Language 29: 65–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar