Cover not available
Article published In:
Writing and the Mind
Edited by David R. Olson and Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 21:3] 2013
► pp. 448–468

Worlds of the possible

Abstraction, imagination, consciousness

 | University of Toronto
The ability to think in abstractions depends on the imagination. An important evolutionary change was the installation of a suite of six imaginative activities that emerge at first in childhood, which include empathy, symbolic play, and theory-of-mind. These abilities can be built upon in adulthood to enable the production of oral and written stories. As a technology, writing has three aspects: material, skill based, and societal. It is in fiction that expertise in writing is most strikingly attained; imagination is put to use to create simulations of the social world that can usefully be offered to others. Fiction is best conceived as an externalization of consciousness, which not only enables us to understand others but also to transform ourselves so that we can reach beyond the immediate.
Keywords: imagination, fiction, consciousness, simulation, writing
Published online: 24 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.3.02oat
References (88)
Andrews-Hanna, J.R., Reidler, J.S., Huang, C., and Buckner, R.L. 2010. “Evidence for the default network’s role in spontaneous cognition”. Journal of Neurophysiology 1041: 322–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R.F. and Masicampo, E.J. 2010. “Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface”. Psychological Review 1171: 945–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.S. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, J.M., Johnston, H., Olley, J.M., Prescott, J.R., Roberts, R.G., Shawcross, W., and Spooner, N.A. 2003. “New ages for human occupation and climatic change at Lake Mungo, Australia”. Nature 4211: 837–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B. 2009. On the Origin of Stories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chagnon, N.A. 1968. Yanomamö: The Fierce People. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chanquoy, L. and Alamargot, D. 2002. “Working memory and writing: Evolution of models and assessment of research/Mémoire de travail et rédaction de textes: évolution des modèles et bilan des premiers travaux”. L’annee Psychologique 1021: 363–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chauvet, J.-M., Deschamps, E.B., and Hillaire, C. 1996. Dawn of Art: The Chauvet Cave. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2006. “Material symbols”. Philosophical Psychology 191: 291–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debray Genette, R. 2004. “Flaubert’s “A simple heart,” or how to make an ending: A study of the manuscripts”. In J. Deppman, D. Ferrer, and M. Groden (eds), Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 69–95.Google Scholar
DeLoache, J. 1987. “Rapid change in symbolic functioning in young children”. Science 2381: 1556–1557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D.C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
De Waal, F. 2008. “Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy”. Annual Review of Psychology, 591: 279–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biasi, P-M. 2002. “Flaubert: The labor of writing”. In A.-M. Christin (ed), A History of Writing: From Hieroglyph to Multimedia. Paris: Flammarion, 340–341.Google Scholar
Dias, M., Roazzi, A., and Harris, P.L. 2005. “Reasoning from unfamiliar premises: A study with unschooled adults”. Psychological Science 161: 550–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. 2006. “The bitter-sweet labor of emoting: The linguistic comparison of writers and physicists”. Creativity Research Journal 181: 191–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., and Peterson, J. 2009. “On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self”. Creativity Research Journal 211: 24–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., and Carland, M. 2012. “Genre or artistic merit: The effect of literature on personality”. Scientific Study of Literature21: 25–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., and Moldoveanu, M. 2013. “Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy”. Scientific Study of Literature 31: 28–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. 2014. “The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self”. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 81: 498–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M. 2003. “The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective”. Annual Review of Anthropology 321: 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The Human Story: A New History of Mankind’s Evolution. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. 2000. “Empathy and sympathy”. In M. Lewis and J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds), Handbook of Emotions, Second Edition. New York: Guilford, 677–691Google Scholar
Engel, H. 2007. The Man Who Forgot How to Read. Toronto: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K.A. and Kintsch, W. 1995. “Long term working memory”. Psychological Review 1021: 211–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, D.L. 2005. “Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language”. Current Anthropology 461: 621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feuer, K.B. 1996. Tolstoy and the Genesis of ‘War and Peace’. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Flaubert, G. 1877. Un Coeur Simple. Paris: Lovere de Poche (current edition 1994).Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1908. “Creative writers and day-dreaming”. In A. Dickson (ed), Pelican Freud Library, 14: Art and literature. London: Penguin, 130–141 (current edition 1985).Google Scholar
Galdi, S., Arcuri, L., and Gawronski, B. 2008. “Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers”. Science 3211: 1100–1102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleik, J. 1993. Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 2009. “Mirroring, simulating and mindreading”. Mind and Language 241: 235–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gottschall, J. 2012. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Boston: Harcourt Mifflin.Google Scholar
Harris, P.L. 1992. “From simulation to folk psychology: The case for development”. Mind and Language 71, 120–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The Work of the Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1978. The Greek Concept of Justice: From Its Shadow in Homer to Its Substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J.R. and Flower, L.S. 1986. “Writing research and the writer”. American Psychologist 411: 1106–1113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. 2000. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, L. 2007. Inventing Human Rights. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Huron, D. 2003. “Is music an evolutionary adaptation?” In I. Peretz and R. Zatorre (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1956. “Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbance”. In R. Jakobson and M. Halle (eds), Fundamentals of Language. ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton, 53–83.Google Scholar
Jaynes, J. 1976. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J.M. and Astington, J.W. 2000. “Theory of mind and social behavior: Causal models tested in a longitudinal study”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 461: 203–220.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.R. 2012. “Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions”. Personality and Individual Differences 521: 150–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N. 2006. How We Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E.E. and Nisbett, R.E. 1971. The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, D.C. and Castano, E. 2013. “Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind”. Science 3421: 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective”. Discourse Processes 391: 125–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A.M. 1987. “Pretence and representation: The origins of ‘theory of mind’”. Psychological Review 941: 412–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libet, B. 1985. “Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 81: 529–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillard, A., Lerner, M.D., Hopkins, E.J., Dore, R.A., Smith, E.D., and Palmquist, C.M. 2013. “The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence”. Psychological Bulletin 139(1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luria, A.R. 1976. Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mar, R.A. and Oatley, K. 2008. “The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 31: 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., and Peterson, J.B. 2006. “Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds”. Journal of Research in Personality 401: 694–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., and Peterson, J.B. 2009. “Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes”. Communications The European Journal of Communication 341: 407–428.Google Scholar
Mar, R.A., Tackett, J.L., and Moore, C. 2010. “Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers”. Cognitive Development 251: 69–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N. and Moore, M.K. 1995. “A theory of the role of imitation in the emergence of self”. In P. Rochat (ed), The Self in Early Infancy: Theory and Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art and Science. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Motion, A. 1998. Keats. New York: Farrar, Stroux and Giroux.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. 1977. “Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes”. Psychological Review 841: 231–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. 1991. “Distributed cognition”. In M.W. Eysenck (ed), Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, 102–107.Google Scholar
. 1992. Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation”. Review of General Psychology 31: 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “From the emotions of conversation to the passions of fiction”. In N.H. Frijda, A.S.R. Manstead, and A. Fischer (eds), Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium. New York: Cambridge University Press, 98–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Narrative modes of consciousness and selfhood”. In P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Consiousness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 375–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Such Stuff as Dreams: The Psychology of Fiction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Thinking deeply in reading and writing”. In P. Socken (ed), Literature in the Digital Age. Kingston, ON: Queens McGill Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. and Djikic, M. 2008. “Writing as thinking”. Review of General Psychology 121: 9–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. and Olson, D.R. 2010. “Cues to the imagination in memoir, science, and fiction”. Review of General Psychology 121: 56–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R. 1994. The World on Paper. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. “History of writing; history of rationality”. Paper presented at the Conference on Individualization, urbanization and social differentiation: Intellectual streams in Eurasia 800-400BC , Stuttgart, February.
Parkinson, T. 1964. W.B. Yeats: The Later Poetry. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Powell, B. 2002. Writing and the Origins of Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, C. 1975. “How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 491: 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scribner, S. and Cole, M. 1981. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell, B. 1953. The Discovery of the Mind in Greek Philosophy and Literature. New York, NY: Dover (modern edition 1982).Google Scholar
Stock, B.V. 1983. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, E. 2008. “Entertainment is emotion: The functional architecture of the entertainment experience”. Media Psychology 111: 28–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M., Hodges, S., and Kohányi, A. 2002-2003. “The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own?” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 221: 361–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Rakoczy, H. 2003. “What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality”. Mind and Language 181: 121–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Vaish, A. 2012. “Origins of human cooperation and morality”. Annual Review of Psychology 641: 231–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. “Tool and symbol in child development”. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (eds), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 19-30 (Originally published1930).Google Scholar
Walton, K.L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, T. 2004. “The writing process: scenarios, sketches and rough drafts”. In T. Unwin (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. 1983. “Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception”. Cognition 131: 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Hogenraad, Robert
2021. The way of visionaries: foresight and imagination, computed. Quality & Quantity 55:5 ► pp. 1631 ff. DOI logo
Djikic, Maja & Keith Oatley
2017. Creativity and its Discontents: The Weary Voyager Model of Creativity in Relation to Self. In The Creative Self, ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Dutta-Flanders, Reshmi
2017. Contrasting Mind-styles. In The Language of Suspense in Crime Fiction, ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Lucchi Basili, Lorenza & Pier Sacco
2017. Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part II: Fictional Narratives and the Social Cognition of Mating. Challenges 8:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Oatley, Keith & Maja Djikic
2017. The Creativity of Literary Writing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains, ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Frijda, Nico H.
2016. The evolutionary emergence of what we call “emotions”. Cognition and Emotion 30:4 ► pp. 609 ff. DOI logo
Oatley, Keith
2016. Imagination, Inference, Intimacy: The Psychology of Pride and Prejudice. Review of General Psychology 20:3 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Oatley, Keith
2016. Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20:8 ► pp. 618 ff. DOI logo
Oatley, Keith
2016. On the sharing of mind. In Emotional Mimicry in Social Context, ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Oatley, Keith
2021. Imaginative Creativity in the Writing and Reading of Stories. In The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity, ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Modes of Enhancement. In The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.