Article published In:
Diagrammatic Reasoning
Edited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 244263
References (64)
Armstrong, D.F., & Wilcox, S
(2007) The gestural origin of language. Oxford University Press, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B.K
(2004) The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80(2), 290–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P
(2012) A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromberg, I
(2007) Systematicity in the Arabic Mental Lexicon. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIX (Vol. 2891, pp. 3–18). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, C.A., & Smith, K
(2012) Cultural Evolution and Perpetuation of Arbitrary Communicative Conventions in Experimental Microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N
(2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(05), 489–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R, & Tylén, K
. (2016) Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 1461, 67–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D
(1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 221, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellison, T.M
(2001) Induction and Inherent Similarity. In M. Ramscar & U. Hahn (Eds.), Similarity and Categorization (pp. 29–50). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellison, T.M., Fay, N., & Garrod, S
in preparation). From Signs to Structure: The Immediate Emergence of Systematicity in an Interactive Communication Game.
Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S
(2013) How to Bootstrap a Human Communication System. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., & Ellison, T.M
(2013) The Cultural Evolution of Human Communication Systems in Different Sized Populations: Usability Trumps Learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Roberts, L
(2008) The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 363(1509), 3553–3561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L., & Swoboda, N
(2010) The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 351–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., Lister, C.J., Ellison, T.M., & Goldin-Meadow, S
(2014) Creating a Communication System from Scratch: Gesture Beats Vocalization Hands Down. Frontiers in Psychology, 51: 354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O
(2006) Grammaticalization and iconicity: Two interacting processes.Google Scholar
Frishberg, N
(1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 511, 696–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B
(2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 737–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B., & Garrod, S
(2011) Experimental Semiotics: A Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(11), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B., Kroos, C., & Rhodes, T
(2010) The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 100–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T
(2007) Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B., & Swoboda, N
(2010) Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S
(2003) The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Butcher, C., Mylander, C., & Dodge, M
(1994) Nouns and Verbs in A Self-Styled Gesture System: What′ s in A Name? Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 259–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S
(1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3), 335–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., Yang, C., Berwick, R., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M., Watumull, J.,. . . Lewontin, R
(2014) The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F
(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework (Vol. 1571): University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J.J
(2006) Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C.F
(1960) Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In W. Lanyon & W. Tavolga (Eds.), Animal sounds and communication (pp. 392–430). Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.Google Scholar
Hupet, M., & Chantraine, Y
(1992) Changes in repeated references: Collaboration or repetition effects? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 211, 485–496.Google Scholar
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S
(2011) Japanese Sound-Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in English-Speaking Children. Cognitive Science, 35(3), 575–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M
(1999) Creation through Contact: Sign Language Emergence and Sign Language Change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony and Development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K
(2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U
(1979) The Signs of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kohler, W
(1929) Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Krauss, R.M., & Weinheimer, S
(1964) Changes in the length of reference phrases as a function of social interaction: A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 11, 113–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1966) Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 343–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A
(2011) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morford, J.P
(1996) Insights to language from the study of gesture: A review of research on the gestural communication of non-signing deaf people. Language and Communication, 16(2), 165–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M
(2000) The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature, 404(6777), 495–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S
(1931-1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1-81). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perlman, M., Dale, R., & Lupyan, G
(2015) Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Iterative vocal charades: the emergence of conventions in vocal communication. In E.A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn & H. Cornish (Eds.), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG10 ). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R., & Vigliocco, G
(2010) Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 2771, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, S.T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E
(2011) Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3526–3529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P
(1990) Natural-Language and Natural-Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S
(1999) The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11(03), 315–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V.S., & Hubbard, E.M
(2001) Synaesthesia–a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.H., & Griffith, P.L
(1979) On the scientific status of iconicity. Sign Language Studies, 25(1), 297–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G
(1985) Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M
(2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(7), 2661–2665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauter, D.A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S.K
(2010) Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), 2408–2412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, D., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A.M
(2014) Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T.C., & Kirby, S
(2010) Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 411–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T.C., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G.R.S
(2009) Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selten, R., & Warglien, M
(2007) The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1041, 7361–7366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shillcock, R., Kirby, S., McDonald, S., & Brew, C
(2001) Filled pauses and their status in the mental lexicon. Paper presented at the ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D.M
(2014) Models of language evolution and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(3), 281–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Linguistic Structure Evolves to Match Meaning Structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Tamariz, M., Ellison, T.M., Barr, D.J., & Fay, N
(2014) Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theisen, C.A., Oberlander, J., & Kirby, S
(2010) Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urban, M
(2011) Conventional sound symbolism in terms for organs of speech: A cross-linguistic study. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 199–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G.K
(1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Cited by (27)

Cited by 27 other publications

Hawkins, Robert D., Megumi Sano, Noah D. Goodman & Judith E. Fan
2023. Visual resemblance and interaction history jointly constrain pictorial meaning. Nature Communications 14:1 DOI logo
Moita, Mara, Ana Maria Abreu & Ana Mineiro
2023. Iconicity in the emergence of a phonological system?. Journal of Language Evolution 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wisher, Izzy & Kristian Tylén
2023. On the semiotic and material constraints of ideographies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46 DOI logo
Cherkes, Bohdan & Yuliya Idak
2022. The phenomenon of the city in the contemporary discourse of urban history. Architectural Studies 8:2 DOI logo
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, T. Mark Ellison, Zachary Blundell, Naomi De Kleine, Murray Garde, Casey J. Lister & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2022. Gesture is the primary modality for language creation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 289:1970 DOI logo
Slonimska, Anita, Asli Özyürek & Olga Capirci
2022. Simultaneity as an Emergent Property of Efficient Communication in Language: A Comparison of Silent Gesture and Sign Language. Cognitive Science 46:5 DOI logo
Woźniak, Mateusz & Guenther Knoblich
2022. Communication and action predictability: two complementary strategies for successful cooperation. Royal Society Open Science 9:9 DOI logo
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Nikolay Panayotov, Sheila Cunningham & Monica Tamariz
2021. Amount of Learning and Signal Stability Modulate Emergence of Structure and Iconicity in Novel Signaling Systems. Cognitive Science 45:11 DOI logo
Mineiro, Ana, Inmaculada Concepción Báez-Montero, Mara Moita, Isabel Galhano-Rodrigues & Alexandre Castro-Caldas
2021. Disentangling Pantomime From Early Sign in a New Sign Language: Window Into Language Evolution Research. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Monaghan, Padraic & Seán G. Roberts
2021. Iconicity and Diachronic Language Change. Cognitive Science 45:4 DOI logo
Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse
2021. Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and Speech 64:1  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Planer, Ronald J. & David Kalkman
2021. Arbitrary Signals and Cognitive Complexity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72:2  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Shea, Kaela, Olivier St-Cyr & Tom Chau
2021. Ecological Design of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device Interface. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 15:4  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 DOI logo
Lister, C.J., B. Walker & N. Fay
2020. Innovation and enculturation in child communication: a cross-sectional study. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 DOI logo
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello
2019. Natural reference: A phylo‐ and ontogenetic perspective on the comprehension of iconic gestures and vocalizations. Developmental Science 22:2 DOI logo
Castillo, Lucía, Kenny Smith & Holly P. Branigan
2019. Interaction Promotes the Adaptation of Referential Conventions to the Communicative Context. Cognitive Science 43:8 DOI logo
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Alison Gibson & Margaret Jamieson
2019. Adults are more efficient in creating and transmitting novel signalling systems than children. Journal of Language Evolution 4:1  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Worthington, Maulfry, Marjolein Dobber & Bert van Oers
2019. The development of mathematical abstraction in the nursery. Educational Studies in Mathematics 102:1  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Cohn, Neil
2018. Combinatorial Morphology in Visual Languages. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Edmiston, Pierce, Marcus Perlman & Gary Lupyan
2018. Repeated imitation makes human vocalizations more word-like. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1874  pp. 20172709 ff. DOI logo
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda & Simon Garrod
2018. How to Create Shared Symbols. Cognitive Science 42:S1  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda, Ichiro Umata, Takugo Fukaya, Yasuhiro Katagiri & Simon Garrod
2018. Universal Principles of Human Communication: Preliminary Evidence From a Cross‐cultural Communication Game. Cognitive Science 42:7  pp. 2397 ff. DOI logo
Nölle, Jonas, Marlene Staib, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
2018. The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition 181  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Lister, Casey J. & Nicolas Fay
2017. How to create a human communication system. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3  pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Misyak, Jennifer, Takao Noguchi & Nick Chater
2016. Instantaneous Conventions. Psychological Science 27:12  pp. 1550 ff. DOI logo
Rogers, Shane L., Nicolas Fay & Rachel L Kendal
2016. Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically. PLOS ONE 11:7  pp. e0159570 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.