Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:1 (2023) ► pp.120–151

Linguistic and pragmatic ways of committing oneself

Evidence from commissive shell nouns in Ghanaian English

 | University of Perugia
In this study I focus on the complementation patterns of commissive shell nouns in Ghanaian English (GhE). Commissive shell nouns are a type of illocutionary shell noun, i.e. a noun that encapsulates a content that is usually expressed in a complement or even separate clause or sentence thereby ascribing it an illocutionary force. I use the usage-based approach to the study of language and investigate the behavioral profile of these nouns in GhE. I apply descriptive statistics to data that have been collected from the Corpus of Global Web-based English (GloWbE). The study provides evidence for the characterization of GhE usage norms, and thus contributes to the scholarly knowledge on this variety of English. It also sheds light on the contribution that the meaning-related and ultimately cognitive perspective can offer in describing the complementation patterns of illocutionary nouns in Postcolonial Englishes (PCEs).
Keywords: commissive shell nouns, complementation, conceptual structure, Dynamic Model, Ghanaian English, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical underpinnings of the study
  • 3.Methodology and data analysis
    • 3.1Grammatical analysis
      • 3.1.1Major patterns
        • 3.1.1.1N-to inf
        • 3.1.1.2N-that
        • 3.1.1.3N-prep-Ving
      • 3.1.2Minor patterns
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22014.ver
References (80)
References
Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos. 1998. The functional motivation of complement that-clauses. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 191. 1–20.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jemima A. 2006. Request forms in English in Ghana. Legon Journal of the Humanities 171. 75–103.Google Scholar
2009. Polite requests in non-native varieties of English: The case of Ghanaian English. Linguistica Atlantica 301. 59–86.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jemima A. & Charity A. Asiama-Ossom. 2010. “If your dress gets missing, I shall buy one”: Compliments and compliment response strategies in English in Ghana. Legon Journal of the Humanities 211. 127–162.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1975 [1962]. How to do things with words. Harvard: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bowen, Rhonwen. 2005. Noun complementation in English. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Brato, Thorsten. 2019. The Historical Corpus of English in Ghana (HiCE Ghana): Motivation, compilation, opportunities. In Alexandra U. Esimaje, Ulrike Gut & Bassey E. Antia (eds.), Corpus linguistics and African Englishes, 119–141. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. English in Ghana: Extra- and intra-territorial forces in a developmental perspective. In Sarah Buschfeld & Alexander Kautzsch (eds.), Modelling World Englishes: A joint approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial varieties, 371–396. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? In Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Jennifer Hay. 2008. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 1181. 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Alexander Kautzsch (eds.). 2014. The evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah & Alexander Kautzsch. 2017. Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 36(1). 104–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah, Kautzsch, Alexander & Edgar Schneider. 2018. From colonial dynamism to current transnationalism. In Sandra C. Deshors (ed.), Modeling World Englishes, 15–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castelfranchi, Cristiano & Marco Guerini. 2007. Is it a promise or a threat? Pragmatics & Cognition 15(2). 277–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dako, Kari. 2019. About the English language in Ghana today and about Ghanaian English and languaging in Ghana. In Helen Yitah & Helen Lauer (eds.), Philosophical foundations of the African humanities through postcolonial perspectives, 220–253. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dako, Kari & Millicent A. Quarcoo. 2017. Attitudes toward English in Ghana. Legon Journal of the Humanities 28(1). 20–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J. 1992. The English infinitive. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2006. The English gerund-participle: A comparison with the infinitive. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2004. Agency in language. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 451–473. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite complementation. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egner, Inge. 2006. Intercultural aspects of the speech act of promising: Western and African practices. Intercultural Pragmatics 3(4). 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faulhaber, Susen. 2011. Verb valency patterns: A challenge for semantics-based accounts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline & Juhani Rudanko. 2019. The Great Complement Shift and the role of understood subjects: The case of fearful. Folia Linguistica 53(1). 51–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Dylan. 2009. Polysemy, syntax and variation. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in Cognitive linguistics, 77–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stephan Th. 2010. Behavioral profiles. The Mental Lexicon 5(3). 323–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamawand, Zeki. 2012. Prepositional complement clauses in English: An exploration in cognitive grammar. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 2(7). 146–156.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, David Heath, Ian F. Roe & Dieter Götz. 2004. A Valency Dictionary of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus. 2012. Ghanaian English. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), The Mouton World Atlas of variation in English: Grammar, 382–393. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Stylistic and sociolinguistic variation in Schneider’s Nativization Phase. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber & Alexander Kautzsch (eds.), The evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond, 86–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson-Ettle, Diana. 2002. Nominal that-clauses in three regional varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30(3). 258–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl E. Hadolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 155–177. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2009. Illocutionary forces and what is said. Mind and Language 24(1). 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. From utterances to speech acts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundation of Cognitive Grammar (vol. 11). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Foundation of Cognitive Grammar (vol. 21). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, David M. Eberhard & Charles D. Fenning. 2023. Ethnologue. Languages of the World: Ghana. Available online at: [URL] (last access: 27 March 2023).
Mair, Christian. 2015. Response to Davies and Fuchs. English World-Wide 36(1). 29–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line. 2011. Copular clauses. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics, 1805–1828. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2003. Is there semantics in all syntax? In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mandorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation, 347–377. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G. 1997. An analysis of the linguistic situation in Ghana. African Languages and Cultures 10(1). 63–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proost, Kristel. 2007. Conceptual structure in lexical items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 71. 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative linkers. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mandorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romasanta, Raquel P. 2019. Innovation at the grammar-lexis intersection in World Englishes. NJES 181. 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouhonen, Juho & Juhani Rudanko. 2019. Comparing explanatory principles of complement selection statistically: A case study based on Canadian English. Studia Neophilologica 91(3). 296–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani. 1991. On verbs governing in-ing in present-day English. English Studies 72(1). 55–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. On verbs governing to-ing in present-day English. English Studies 73(1). 68–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. On verbs governing at-ing in present-day English. English Studies 76(3). 264–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Explaining grammatical variation and change. Journal of English Linguistics 38(1). 4–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Infinitives and gerunds in recent English. Palgrave: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena S. 2021. “I withdraw and apologise but…”: Ghanaian parliamentary apologies, the issue of sincerity and acceptance. Journal of Pragmatics 1801. 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2009. Senso e azione. Lexia 3–41. 31–53.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 1998. Constant and ephemeral hypostatization: Thing, problem and other shell nouns. In Bernard Caron (ed.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Elsevier, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33(1). 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. & Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sey, Kofi A. 1973. Ghanaian English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Steger, Maria & Edgar W. Schneider. 2012. Complexity as a function of iconicity: The case of complement clause constructions in New Englishes. In Bernd Kortmann & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, 156–191. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turchetta, Barbara. 1996. Multilinguismo e lingue veicolari in Africa occidentale. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Van Praet, Wout & Kristin Davidse. 2015. Revisiting the typology of English copular clauses. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 4(19). 1–32.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanparys, Johan. 1996. Categories and complements of illocutionary verbs in a cognitive perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vergaro, Carla. 2018. Illocutionary shell nouns in English. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Graded salience and construal: The case of illocutionary shell-noun complementation patterns. Lingue e Linguaggio 19(2). 191–222.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1980. On speech act verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe. 2003. The role of extraction and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mandorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation, 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sidney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar