Cover not available
Article published In:
New Theoretical Insights into Untruthfulness
Edited by Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1] 2016
► pp. 1–15

On untruthfulness, its adversaries and strange bedfellows

| University of Lódz

This introductory paper aims to demystify the concept of untruthfulness. Drawing on the scholarship on deception, the author reports on a distinction between the (objective) truth and (subjective) truthfulness, as well as their respective opposites: falsehood and untruthfulness. An attempt is made to discriminate between truthfulness and sincerity, to notions which capture similar phenomena but have originated in distinct scholarly traditions. Further, the author depicts untruthfulness as an internally diversified construct and teases out its main subtypes. Some light is shed on overt untruthfulness and covert untruthfulness, as approached in philosophical, cognitive and pragmatic literature. The paper closes with a description of the scope of the present Special Issue entitled “New theoretical insights into untruthfulness”.

Keywords: (in)sincerity, rhetorical figure, irony, deception, (un)truthfulness
Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.01dyn
References
Akmajian, A., Demers, R., Farmer, A. and Harnish, R
2001 Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D.M
1970 “Meaning and communication.” Philosophical Review 801: 427–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L
1962 How To Do Things With Words. J.O. Urmson and M. Sbisá (eds), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, M
1993 “More about metaphor.” In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press, 19–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bok, S
1978 Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R. and Brdar, M
2010 “ ‘Mummy, i love you like a thousand ladybirds’: Reflections on the emergence of hyperbolic effects and the truth of hyperboles.” In A. Burkhardt and B. Nerlich (eds), Tropical Truth(s). The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 383–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.L
1980 “The pragmatics of verbal irony.” In R.W. Shuy and A. Shnukal (eds), Language use and the Uses of Language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 111–127.Google Scholar
Camp, E
2006 “Contextualism, metaphor and what is said.” Mind & Language 21(3): 280–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carson, T
2006 “The definition of lying.” Noûs 401: 284–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. and Feehan, T
1977 “The intent to deceive.” The Journal of Philosophy 741: 143–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H
2000 “On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension.” Pragmatics & Cognition 81: 277–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Irony, analogy and truth.” In A. Burkhardt and B. Nerlich (eds), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes. De Gruyter, 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creusere, M
2000 “A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity.” Metaphor and Symbol 151: 29–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D
1978 “What metaphors mean.” Critical Inquiry 51: 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Deception and division.” In J. Elster (ed), The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–92.Google Scholar
Dynel, M
2013 “Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics 101: 403–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 (forth). “Implicitness via overt untruthfulness: Grice on quality-based figures of speech.” In P. Cap and M. Dynel (eds), Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallis, D
2010 “Lying and deception.” Philosophers’ Imprint 101: 1–22.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R
1993 “Process and products in making sense of tropes.” In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Irony in talk among friends.” Metaphor and Symbol 151: 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S
1995 “Commentary on nonliteral language: Processing and use.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 101: 47–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S and Keysar, B
1993 “How metaphors work.” In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press, 401–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P
1989 “Logic and conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 22–40. [Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58; Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In D. Davison and G. Harman (eds), The Logic of Grammar. Dickenson: Encino, 64–75.]Google Scholar
Habermas, J
1979 Communication and the Evolution of Society. T. McCarthy (ed). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
1984 The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. T. McCarthy (transl), Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
1998 [1976] On the Pragmatics Communication, M. Cooke (ed). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R
1952 The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haverkate, H
1990 “A speech act analysis of irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heal, J
1976/1977 “Insincerity and commands.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 771: 183–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel
1996 [1791] “On the miscarriage of all philosophical trials in theodicy.” In A.W. Wood and G. di Giovanni (eds), Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 24–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni
2011 “Irony via ‘surrealism’.” In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. and Roberts, R
1993 “On satire and parody: The importance of being ironic.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 81: 97–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. and Brown, M
1995 “How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1241: 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee M
2010 “Counterfactuals and metaphor.” In A. Burkhardt and B. Nerlich (eds), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes. Mouton de Gruyter, 123–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D
1975 “Languages and language.” In K. Gunderson (ed), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume VII1. University of Minnesota Press, 3–35.Google Scholar
Livnat, Z
2004 “On verbal irony, meta-linguistic knowledge and echoic interpretation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 121: 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Quantity, truthfulness and ironic effect.” Language Sciences 33(2): 305–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, J
2008b “Two definitions of lying.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 221: 211–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 [2008a] “The definition of lying and deception.” In E.N. Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), URL = = [URL].Google Scholar
Marsili, N
2016 (forth). “Lying by promising. A study on insincere illocutionary acts.” International Review of Pragmatics.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T
1979 “Translator’s introduction.” In J. Habermas (ed), Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press vii-xxiv.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J
2011 “On lying: Intentionality, implicature, and imprecision.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8(2): 277–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Lying and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G
1993 “Images and models, similes and metaphors.” In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press, 357–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moran, R
2005 Problems with sincerity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1051: 325–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozar, A
2008 The moral significance of sincerity. PhD Thesis. Fordham University.Google Scholar
Searle, J
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “Metaphor.” In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press, 83–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. and Vanderveken, D
1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Simpson, D
1992 “Lying, liars and language.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 521: 623–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokke, A
2014 “Insincerity.” Noûs 481: 496–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E
1987 “The definition of lie .” In D. Holland & N. Quinn (eds), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, J
2003 “Truthfulness.” In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Vincent Marelli, J
2006 “Truthfulness”. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. and Castelfranchi, C
1981 “On the art of lying: how to lie while saying the truth.” In H. Parret, M. Sbisa and J. Verschueren (eds), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics , Urbino, July 8-14, 1979. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 749–777. DOI logo
Williams, B
2002 Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D
1995 “Is there a maxim of truthfulness?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 197–212.Google Scholar
2006 “The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?” Lingua 1161: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D
2000 [2002, 2012] “Truthfulness and relevance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and relevance.” Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and relevance.” In D. Wilson and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–83]Google Scholar
2012 “Explaining irony.” In D. Wilson and D. Sperber (eds), Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, F
2000 “On reaching the intended ironic interpretation.” International Journal of Communication 10 (1-2): 27–78.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Dynel, Marta
2016. “Trolling is not stupid”: Internet trolling as the art of deception serving entertainment. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:3 DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. But seriously: On conversational humour and (un)truthfulness. Lingua 197 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. The Irony of Irony: Irony Based on Truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.