Cover not available
Article published In:
New Theoretical Insights into Untruthfulness
Edited by Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1] 2016
► pp. 150–173

The ironist’s intentions

Communicative priority and manifestness

| University of Kent

This paper examines the ironic speaker’s intentions, drawing distinctions on the basis of two criteria: communicative priority (primary — secondary communicative intentions) and manifestness (overt — subtle — mixed — covert). It is argued that these provide useful insights into the widely discussed categories of speaker’s intentions (e.g. a priori versus post facto intentions, private i-intentions versus shared we-intentions). First of all, “ironic meaning” is viewed as comprising a set of different types of meaning, including a bundle of implicatures that can be hierarchically ranked in terms of both communicative priority and inferential priority. Secondly, examples of different degrees of manifestness of the ironist’s intentions are discussed in light of the communicative complexities of irony, which is viewed as a higher-order phenomenon. The final discussion attempts to bring together the analyses of the speaker’s and the hearer’s perspectives, contributing to a dynamic model of ironic discourse.

Keywords: manifestness, speaker intentions, irony, primary intended meaning
Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.07kap
References
Alfano, M. and Robinson, B
2014 “Bragging”. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3(4): 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, E
1957 Intention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Arundale, R
2008 “Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction”. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 231–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., Poggi, I
2003 “Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm”. Humor 16(2): 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bara, B
2011 “Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(3): 443–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, G. and Fox Tree, J
2005 “Is There an Ironic Tone of Voice?” Language and Speech 48(3): 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. and Feehan, T
1977 “The intent to deceive”. Journal of Philosophy 741: 143–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, M
2011 “Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations”. In M. Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour Across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 271: 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Intention to deceive, bald-faced lies, and deceptive implicature: Insights into Lying at the semantics-pragmatics interface”. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(3): 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a “Pejoration via sarcastic irony and sarcasm”. In R. Finkenbeiner, J. Meibauer and Heike Wiese (eds), Perjoration. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallis, D
2009 “What is lying?” The Journal of Philosophy 1061: 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, J
2011 “She’s (not) a fine friend: ‘Saying’ and criticism in irony”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(1): 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R
2012 “Are ironic acts deliberate?” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 104–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. and Izett, C.D
2005 “Irony as Persuasive Communication”. In H.L. Colston and A.N. Katz (eds), Irony Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 131–152.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., O’Brien, J. and Doolittle, S
1995 “Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension”. Discourse Processes 201: 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P
1975 “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
1978 “Further notes on logic and conversation”. In P. Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 113–127.Google Scholar
Haugh, M
2008 “Intention in Pragmatics”. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “On understandings of intention: A response to Wedgwood”. Intercultural Pragmatics 91: 161–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 481: 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. and Jaszczolt, K.M
2012 “Speaker intentions and intentionality”. In K. Allan and K.M. Jaszczolt (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, K.M
1996 “Relevance and infinity: Implications for discourse interpretation”. Journal of Pragmatics 251: 703–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Cancellability and the primary/secondary meaning distinction”. Intercultural Pragmatics 61: 259–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapogianni, E
2011 “Irony via ‘surrealism’”. In M. Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour Across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Irony and the literal versus nonliteral distinction: A typological approach with focus on ironic implicature strength. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2014 “Differences in use and function of verbal irony between real and fictional discourse: (Mis)interpretation and irony blindness”. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 271: 597–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Irony in discourse: Collaborative and pseudo-collaborative construction of ironic meaning”. Paper presented at The Discursive Practice of Irony and Banter - International Conference , Lyon: University of Lyon 2.
2016 “The ironic operation: revisiting the components of ironic meaning”. Journal of Pragmatics 911: 16–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapogianni, E. and Arvaniti, A
2015 “Prosodic variation in ironic strategies: A cross-linguistic investigation”. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Greek Linguistics , Berlin.
Kaufer, D
1977 “Irony and rhetorical strategy”. Philosophy and Rhetoric 101: 90–110.Google Scholar
Kecskés, I
2008 “Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning”. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 386–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “The paradox of communication Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics”. Pragmatics and Society 1(1): 50–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Is there anyone out there who really is interested in the speaker?” Language and Dialogue 2(2): 285–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knox, N
1972 “On the classification of ironies”. Modern Philology 70(1): 53–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London-New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J
2005 “Lying and falsely implicating”. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1373–1399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Lying and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nemeth T., E
2008 “Verbal information transmission without communicative intention”. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 153–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F
2004 Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2005 “Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties”. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 171–96.Google Scholar
Sanders R.E
2013 “The duality of speaker meaning: What makes self-repair, insincerity and sarcasm possible”. Journal of Pragmatics 481: 112–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A
2010 Understanding the Primary Meaning: A Study with Reference to Requests in Russian and British English. PhD Thesis – University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D
1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In P. Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–318.Google Scholar
1986/1995 Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D
2012 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. and Leekam, S
1991.“Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second order intention”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 91: 257–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus Ramos, F
2000 “Literal/nonliteral and the processing of verbal irony”. Pragmalinguistica 8-91: 349–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Barzy, Mahsa, Ruth Filik, David Williams & Heather J. Ferguson
2020. Emotional Processing of Ironic Versus Literal Criticism in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: Evidence From Eye‐Tracking. Autism Research 13:4 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan
2018. Chapter 9. Irony as counter positioning. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. Academics vs. American scriptwriters vs. academics: A battle over the etic and emic “sarcasm” and “irony” labels. Language & Communication 55 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. The Irony of Irony: Irony Based on Truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2018. Theoretically onMock Politeness in English and Italian. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2019. Ironic intentions in action and interaction. Language Sciences 75 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2023. Irony and Humor. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Kapogianni, Eleni
2018. Ironic implicature strength and the test of explicit cancellability. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sullivan, Arthur
2019. The varieties of verbal irony: a new neo-Gricean taxonomy. Lingua 232 ► pp. 102740 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.