This paper explores the use of non-quotational direct speech – a construction displaying deictic perspective persistence – in the Hebrew Bible, an ancient text of great cultural significance. We focus on the use of non-quotational direct speech to introduce intentions, hopes, motives, or states of affairs. Special emphasis is laid on the complementizer lemor, grammaticalized from a speaking verb, which introduces the import of an action through direct speech. We claim that such fictive speech is grounded in face-to-face conversation as conceptual model or frame. Beyond the Hebrew Bible itself, we discuss possible extended implications that our findings have for the link between grammatical structures conventionally associated with perspective shift and orality, as well as possible links between the conceptual frame of situated interaction and the notion of linguistic meaning. Ultimately, we hope to advance the view that grammar and discourse are inherently conversational and thus viewpointed in nature.
1999The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of 1 and 2 Samuel. New York: W.W. Norton.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Beaumont, Daniel
1996 “Hard-Boiled: Narrative Discourse in Early Muslim Tradition.” Studia Islamica 831: 5–31.
Blyth, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang
1990 “I’m like, ‘Say What?!’: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative.” American Speech 65 (3): 215–227.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 66 (4): 764–805.
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Du Bois, John W.
2011 “Co-Opting Intersubjectivity: Dialogic Rhetoric of the Self.” In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, ed. by Christian Meyer and Felix Girke, 52–83. Oxford: Berghahn.
Dundes, Alan
1999Holy Writ as Oral Lit: The Bible as Folklore. Lanham/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2001 “Compression and Global Insight.” Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3–4): 283–304.
Gasparov, Boris
2010Speech, Memory, and Meaning: Intertextuality in Everyday Language. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Goffman, Erving
1963Behavior in Public Places, Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2003 “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (5): 219–224.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldenberg, Gideon
1991 “On Direct Speech and the Hebrew Bible.” Studies in Hebrew and Aramaic Syntax, Ed. by Karel Jongeling, Heleen Murre-van den Berg, and van Rompay, 79–96. Leiden: Brill.
2000 “(Free) Direct Discourse in Biblical Hebrew.” Hebrew Studies 411: 7–30.
Jarque, Maria Josep, and Esther Pascual
2016 “Mixed Viewpoints in Factual and Fictive Discourse in Catalan Sign Language Narratives”. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. By Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun-Lu and Arie Verhagen, 259–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1999 “Virtual Reality.” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29 (2): 77–104.
2016Direct Speech in Beowulf and other Old English Narrative Poems. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Marnette, Sophie
1998Narrateur et Points de Vue dans la Littérature Française Médiévale: Une Approche Linguistique. Berne: Peter Lang.
Miller, Cynthia L.
2003The Representation of Speech in Biblical Hebrew Narrative: A Linguistic Analysis. 2nd ed. Harvard Semitic Monographs. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Moshavi, Adina
2010 “ ‘Is That Your Voice, My Son David?’: Conductive Questions in Biblical Hebrew.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 36 (1): 65–81.
Moshavi, Adina
2013 “The Communicative Functions of Content (‘wh’) Questions in Classical Biblical Hebrew Prose.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 39 (2): 69–87.
Ong, Walter J.
2002Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.
Pascual, Esther
2006 “Fictive Interaction within the Sentence: A Communicative Type of Fictivity in Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (2): 245–267.
2012 “Reenactment: An Embodied Cognition Approach to Meaning and Linguistic Content.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (4): 583–598.
Sandler, Sergeiy
2016 “Fictive Interaction and the Nature of Linguistic Meaning.” In The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction, ed. by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler, 23–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2016 “Evidential Fictive Interaction in Ungarinyin and Russian.” In The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction, ed. by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler, 255–275. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Streeck, Jürgen
2002 “Grammars, Words, and Embodied Meanings: On the Uses and Evolution of so and like.” Journal of Communication 52 (3): 581–596.
Talmy, Leonard
2000 “Fictive Motion in Language and ‘ception.’” In Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems, 1.99–1.175. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tannen, Deborah
1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narratives.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmans, 311–332. Berlin: Mouton.
Tannen, Deborah
2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2008 “The Status of Purpose, Reason and Intended Endpoint in the Typology of Complex Sentences: Implications for Layered Models of Clause Structure.” Linguistics 461: 757–788.
Voloshinov, Valentin Nikolaevich
1986Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
