This paper explores social bonding in language play via the construction of ‘Chinese character (annotation)’ on
two major social media platforms (Sina Weibo and WeChat) in China. The Chinese characters and their bracketed annotations under
study, despite their one-to-one matching in sequence, never match each other either in meaning or in pronunciation. They convey a
sense of playfulness among social media users who may be acquaintances or strangers to each other. While research on language play
has uncovered systematic interpersonal meanings and social functions, our analysis of screen-based and user-based data shows that
such linguistic behavior in a virtual community of practice contributes to social bonding among social media players. Within such
structure and with different substitutes for both characters and annotations, social media users frame their expressions in
evaluative or emotive ways to facilitate their presentation of an alternative self and of individual or community values.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. “Online Data Collection.” In Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, ed. by Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs, and Gerard Van Herk, 236–249. London: Routledge.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014. “Languaging When Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context & Media 451: 62–73.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2015. “Negotiating Authenticities in Mediatized Times.” Discourse, Context & Media 81: 74–77.
Anis, Jacques. 2007. “Neography: Unconventional Spelling in French SMS Text Messages.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 87–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arndt, Horst and Richard W. Janney. 1985. “Improving Emotive Communication: Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesics Conflict Avoidance Techniques.” Per Linguam 11:21–30.
Arndt, Horst, and Richard W. Janney. 1987. InterGrammar: Towards an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Arndt, Horst, and Richard W. Janney. 1991. “Verbal, Prosodic, and Kinesic Emotive Contrasts in Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 151: 521–549.
Bell, Nancy (ed.). 2017. Multiple Perspectives on Language Play. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Coulson, S.2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dynel, Marta. 2017. “Participation as Audience Design.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 61–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dynel, Martal, and Fabio I. M. Poppi. 2019. “Risum teneatis, amici?: The Socio-Pragmatics of RoastMe Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 1391: 1–21.
Fillmore, Charles J.1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2017. “‘Whose Context Collapse?’: Ethical Clashes in the Study of Language and Social Media in Context.” Applied Linguistics Review 8(2–3): 169–189.
Georgalou, Mariza. 2017. Discourse and Identity on Facebook: How We Use Language and Multimodal Texts to Present Identity Online. London: Bloomsbury.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Haugh, Michael. 2017. “Teasing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvartore Attardo, 204–218. New York: Routledge.
Herring, Susan C.2004. “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, Susan C., and Astsa Zelenkauskaite. 2009. “Symbolic Capital in a Virtual Heterosexual Market: Abbreviation and Insertion in Italian iTV SMS.” Written Communication 26(1): 5–31.
Hogan, Bernie. 2010. “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 301: 377–386.
Jones, Rodney H.2015. “Discourse, Cybernetics, and the Entextualisation of the Self.” In Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age, ed. by Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik, and Christoph A. Hafner, 28–47. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, and Sherzer, Joel. 1976. “Introduction.” In Speech Play: Research and Resources for Studying Linguistic Creativity, ed. by Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, 1–16. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Knospe, Sebastian, Alexander Onysko, and Maik Goth (eds.). 2016. Crossing Languages to Play with Words: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Carmen. 2007. “Linguistic Features of Email and ICQ Instant Messaging in Hong Kong.” In The Multilingual Internet. Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 184–208. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Carmen. 2014. “Language Choice and Self-presentation in Social Media: The Case of University Students in Hong Kong.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 91–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Litt, Eden. 2012. “Knock, Knock. Who’s There? The Imagined Audience.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(3): 330–345.
Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Maíz Arévalo, Carmen. 2017. “Getting ‘Liked’.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian. R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 575–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marwick, Alice E., and Danah boyd. 2010. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Con text Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 131: 96–113.
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2016. “Style, Creativity and Play.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 103–116. Abingdon: Routledge.
Norrick, Neal R.2004. “Humor, Tellability and Conarration in Conversation.” Text 241: 79–111.
North, Sarah. 2007. “‘The Voices, the Voices’: Creativity in Online Conversation.” Applied Linguistics 28(4): 538–555.
Page, Ruth. 2018. Narrative Online: Shared Stories in Social Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann W. Unger, and Michele Zappavigna. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media. New York: Routledge.
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg (eds.). 2014. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Su, His-Yao. 2007. “The Mutilingual and Multiorthographic Taiwan-Based Internet: Creative Uses of Writing Systems on College-affiliated BBSs.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 64–86. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant. 2014. “Audience Design and Language Choice in the Construction and Maintenance of Translocal Communities on Social Network Sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat. 1993. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination in Interview.” In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 57–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 3 March 2016).
Thaler, Verena. 2016. “Varieties of Wordplay.” In Crossing Languages to Play with Words: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Sebastian Knospe, Alexander Onysko, and Maik Goth. 47–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thurlow, Crispin. 2012. “Determined Creativity: Language Play in New Media.” In Discourse and Creativity, ed. by Rodney Jones, 169–190. Harkow: Pearson.
Toma, Catalina L., and Cassandra L. Carlson. 2015. “How Do Facebook Users Believe They Come across in Their Profiles?: A Meta-Perception Approach to Investigating Facebook Self-Presentation.” Communication Research Reports 32(1): 93–101.
Utz, Sonja. 2015. “The Function of Self-Disclosure on Social Network Sites; Not Only Intimate, but also Positive and Entertaining Self-Disclosure Increase the Feelings of Connection.” Computers in Human Behavior 451: 1–10.
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wesch, Mike. 2008. “Context Collapse.” [URL] (accessed 20 June 2016).
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media Society 13(5): 788–806.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. “CoffeeTweets: Bonding around the Been on Twitter.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by. Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 139–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2018. Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.
2024. “(scream)(wriggle)(dismally crawl)” – parentheses as semiotic resources for translanguaging and trans-semiotic practices on Chinese micro-blogging. Social Semiotics► pp. 1 ff.
2022. “In these pandemic times”: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100595 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.