Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 33:1 (2023) ► pp.49–77

Development of the use of discourse markers across different fluency levels of CEFR

A learner corpus analysis

ORCID logo | Republic of China Naval Academy
ORCID logo | National Taipei University of Technology
ORCID logo | Charles University
Fluent L2 English speakers frequently use discourse markers (DMs) as a speech management strategy, but research has largely ignored how this develops across different proficiency levels and how it is related to immersive experiences. This study examines the developmental patterns of three DMs – well, you know and like – in the speech of learners at A2-C1 in CEFR with and without immersive experiences in target language environments. The fluency-rated LINDSEI corpus (173 learners) and a parallel native corpus (50 speakers) provided approximately 350,000 tokens and 3,395 instances of the analyzed DMs. Overall, DM frequency (especially with well and you know) among C1 speakers increases with rising fluency levels up to almost native-like levels. Immersive experience correlates positively with overall and individual DM frequency (except for like). As the skillful use of DMs results in more fluent speech production, the didactic implications for L2 instructors should be developed.
Keywords: discourse marker, speech fluency, immersive experience, learner corpus, CEFR, LINDSEI
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse markers in speech
    • 2.1Discourse markers and speech fluency
    • 2.2Discourse markers in native and learner discourse
    • 2.3Discourse markers and immersive experience
    • 2.4Focal discourse markers
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Corpus data under investigation
    • 4.2Data analysis
  • 5.Corpus analysis results
    • 5.1Overall frequencies of the three discourse markers
    • 5.2Three focal discourse markers in learner and native groups
      • 5.2.1Discourse marker well
      • 5.2.2Discourse marker you know;
      • 5.2.3Discourse marker like
    • 5.3Use of discourse markers and learners’ immersive experience
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Developmental pattern of discourse markers across fluency levels in CEFR
    • 6.2Effects of immersive experience on the use of discourse markers
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 13 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21016.hua
References (61)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2011. “ Well I’m Not Sure I Think… The Use of Well by Non-Native Speakers.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (2): 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, Stig Johansson, Susan Conrad, and Geoffrey Leech. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buysse, Lieven. 2012. “ So as a Multifunctional Discourse Marker in Native and Learner Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1764–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlsen, Cecilie. 2012. “Proficiency Level – A Fuzzy Variable in Computer Learner Corpora.” Applied Linguistics 33 (2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 2008. “ Right, Well, OK, So, It’s Like, You Know, Isn’t It, I Suppose: Spoken Words, Written Words and Why Speaking Is Different.” In The Sound and the Silence: Key Perspectives on Speaking and Listening and Skills for Life, ed. by Caroline Hudson, 11–23. Coventry: Quality Improvement Agency.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Spoken Grammar: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?” Applied Linguistics 38 (1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2018. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Crible, Ludivine. 2017. “Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency across Registers: A Contrastive Usage-based Study in English and French.” PhD diss., Université de Berne.
Crible, Ludivine, Liesbeth Degand, and Gaëtanelle Gilquin. 2017. “The Clustering of Discourse Markers and Filled Pauses: A Corpus-Based French-English Study of (Dis)fluency.” Languages in Contrast 17 (1): 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Sylvie. 2004. “Preferred Sequences of Words in NS and NNS Speech.” Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures New Series 21: 225–246.Google Scholar
Dumont, Amandine. 2018. Fluency and Disfluency: A Corpus Study of Non-Native and Native Speaker (Dis)fluency Profiles. PhD thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock. 2002. “Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean .” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “An Approach to Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3): 383–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Janet M. 2003. “Use of the Discourse Marker Like in Interviews.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (3): 365–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, Loretta, and Ronald Carter. 2007. “Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings.” Applied Linguistics 28 (3): 410–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2008. “Hesitation Markers among EFL Learners: Pragmatic Deficiency or Difference?” In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 119–149. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Discourse Markers in L2 English: From Classroom to Naturalistic Input.” In New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building Bridges, ed. by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, and Sarah Chevalier, 213–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Sylviane Granger. 2015. “Learner Language.” In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Douglas Biber and Rand Reppen, 418–435. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Sylvie De Cock, and Sylviane Granger (eds.). 2010. LINDSEI Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Götz, Sandra. 2013. Fluency in Native and Non-Native English Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Götz, Sandra, and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2018. “Investigating the Effect of the Study Abroad Variable on Learner Output: A Pseudo-Longitudinal Study on Spoken German Learner English.” In Learner Corpus Research, ed. by Vaclav Brezina, and Lynne Flowerdew, 47–65. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gráf, Tomáš. 2017. “The Story of the Learner Corpus LINDSEI_CZ.” Studie z Aplikované Lingvistiky [Studies in Applied Linguistics] 8 (2): 22–35.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela. 2002. “Learner Corpora and Language Testing: Smallwords as Markers of Learner Fluency.” In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, ed. by Sylviane Granger, Joseph Hung, and Stephanie Petch-Tyson, 143–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedge, Tricia. 1993. “Key Concepts in ELT.” ELT Journal 47 (3): 275–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, John, and Andrea Vergun. 2007. “Language Which Is Not Taught: The Discourse Marker Use of Beginning Adult Learners of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 157–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2002. “Spoken Discourse.” In Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners of American English, ed. by Michael Rundell, LA16–LA17. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2009. “Subjectivity in English as Lingua Franca Discourse: The Case of You Know .” Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (2): 171–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, Alex, Folkert Kuiken, and Ineke Vedder (eds.). 2012. Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Lan-fen. 2014. “Constructing the Taiwanese Component of the Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI).” Taiwan Journal of TESOL 11 (1): 31–74.Google Scholar
. 2019. “A Corpus-Based Exploration of the Discourse Marker Well in Spoken Interlanguage.” Language and Speech 62 (3): 570–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Lan-fen, and Tomáš Gráf. (2021). “Expanding LINDSEI to Spoken Learner English from Several L1s across CEFR Levels.” Corpora 16 (2): 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Lan-fen, Simon Kubelec, Nicole Keng, and Lung-hsun Hsu. 2018. “Evaluating CEFR Rater Performance through the Analysis of Spoken Learner Corpora.” Language Testing in Asia 8 (14): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Christian, Shelley Byrne, and Nicola Halenko. 2018. Successful Spoken English: Findings from Learner Corpora. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, Nancy L., Karen C. Barrett, and George A. Morgan. 2005. SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liao, Silvie. 2009. “Variation in the Use of Discourse Markers by Chinese Teaching Assistants in the US.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1313–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Binmei. 2016. “Effect of L2 Exposure: From a Perspective of Discourse Markers.” Applied Linguistics Review 7 (1): 73–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lomax, Richard G., and Debbie L. Hahs-Vaughn. 2012. Statistical Concepts – A Second Course (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mora, Joan C., and Margalida Valls-Ferrer. 2012. “Oral Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity in Formal Instruction and Study Abroad Learning Contexts.” TESOL Quarterly 46 (4): 610–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native English Discourse (Vol. 1381). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neary-Sundquist, Colleen. 2014. “The Use of Pragmatic Markers across Proficiency Levels in Second Language Speech.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 4 (4): 637–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Michael McCarthy, and Ronald Carter. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallant, Julie. 2011. SPSS Survival Manual (4th ed.). Crows Nest NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Polat, Brittany. 2011. “Investigating Acquisition of Discourse Markers through a Developmental Learner Corpus.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3745–3756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prodromou, Luke. 2008. English as a Lingua Franca: A Corpus-Based Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2002. “The Pragmatic Fossilization of Discourse Markers in Non-Native Speakers of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 769–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2019. Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1999. “Discourse Markers.” Lingua 1071: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2016. WordSmith Tools (Version 7). Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 1980. “ Well in Conversation.” In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, ed. by Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, 167–177. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. 2012. Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 2011. “ Uh and Um as Sociolinguistic Markers in British English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (2): 173–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Pei-shu., and Wo-hsin Chu. 2017. “The Use of Discourse Markers among Mandarin Chinese Teachers, and Chinese as a Second Language and Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners.” Applied Linguistics 38 (5): 638–665.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wei, Ming. 2011. “A Comparative Study of the Oral Proficiency of Chinese Learners of English across Task Functions: A Discourse Marker Perspective.” Foreign Language Annals 44 (4): 674–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz, and Katja Jäschke. 2021. “Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-Automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables.” Corpus Pragmatics 51: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Lin, Yen-Liang, Yu-Chan Tsai & Chen-Yu Chester Hsieh
2024. Discourse competence across band scores: an analysis of speaking performance in the General English Proficiency Test. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:4 ► pp. 1719 ff. DOI logo
Llanes, Àngels, Júlia Barón & Ariadna Sánchez-Hernández
2024. L2 pragmatic development by early teenagers in study abroad and foreign language settings: a focus on pragmatic markers. Language, Culture and Curriculum 37:3 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Hernández, Ariadna, Júlia Barón & Àngels Llanes
2024. The Development of Pragmatic Markers in English as a Second Language: Do Age and Learning Context Matter?. Languages 9:4 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Changjiang
2024. Cognitive Linguistics: Fostering English Language Proficiency in Higher Education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher DOI logo
Li, Zhenzhen, Han Ding & Shaohong Zhang
2023. Cross-Corpus Readability Compatibility Assessment for English Texts. IEEE Access 11 ► pp. 101985 ff. DOI logo
Wetzel, Mathis, Ekaterina Tskhovrebova, Pascal M. Gygax & Sandrine Zufferey
2023. Pragmatic and syntactic constraints on French causal connectives: An evaluation of native and non-native speakers’ sensitivity. Journal of Pragmatics 209 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Yang & Gang Zeng
2023. Lesser relevance markers in Chinese academic spoken English corpus: a cross-disciplinary study on pragmatic features. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.