Laughter is primarily a social phenomenon and used as a resource for managing social relationships and identities. While it is often unplanned and uncensored, laughter is also strategically produced at particular moments to accomplish particular goals in interaction. In this article, I examine the ways in which laughter – specifically, what I call coping laughter – is utilized to manage the face-threatening relational aspects of disagreements rather than to deal with the actual content of disputes. The four specific functions of coping laughter that I analyze are (1) face-threat mitigation, (2) face-loss concealment, (3) serious-to-nonserious frame switch, and (4) topic transition facilitation. Which of these functions are accomplished varies depending on several contextual factors, including who initiates the laughter, how other participants respond to the laughter, and the overarching context and participant roles at play in the interaction. I discuss each of these influencing factors and the associated interactional functions of coping laughter in relation to the data I analyze. I argue that coping laughter is an efficient and effective strategy for dealing with the interactional trouble caused by a disagreement without dealing with its content.
Chapman, A., and H. Foot (eds.) (1996) Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. Piscataway, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. BoP
Coates, J. (1996) Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. BoP
Coates, J. (2007) Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 29-49. BoP
Du Bois, J. (2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139-182.
Du Bois, J. (2010) Representing discourse. Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Glenn, P. (1983) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication 531: 127-149.
Glenn, P.J. (1989) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Communication 53.2: 127-149.
Glenn, P. (1992) Current speaker initiation of two-party shared laughter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 251: 139-162.
Glenn, P.J. (2003) Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Glenn, P. (2010) Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1485-1498. BoP
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. BoP
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row. BoP
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Haakana, M. (2010). Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1499-1512. BoP
Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holt, E. (2010) The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1513-1525. BoP
Holtgraves, T. (2005) Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 11: 73-93. BoP
Hutchby, I., and R. Wooffitt (1998) Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. BoP
Jefferson, G. (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 79-95.
Jefferson, G. (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-369. BoP
Jefferson, G., H. Sacks, and E. Schegloff (1977) Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter. Pragmatics Microfiche. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locher, M., and R. Watts (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9-33. BoP
Markaki, V., S. Merlino, L. Mondada, and F. Oloff (2010) Laughter in professional meetings: The organization of an emergent ethnic joke. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1526-1542. BoP
Mills, S. (2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Norrick, N., and A. Spitz (2008) Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 40.10: 1661-1686. BoP
O’Driscoll, J. (2007) What’s in an FTA? Reflections on a chance meeting with Claudine. Journal of Politeness Research 31: 243-268.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In J. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79-112. BoP
Potter, J. (1997) Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy, and A. Bryman (eds.), Handbook of data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers, pp. 610-623.
Provine, R. (2000) Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. New York: Viking.
Sacks, H. (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button, and J. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation: Multilingual matters. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 697-735. BoP
Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (2003) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005) (Im)Politeness, face, and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and relationships. Journal of Politeness Research 11: 95-119. BoP
Ten Have, P. (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Wood, L., and R. Kroger (2000) Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. BoP
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
McMain, Emma
2024. Getting good at bad emotion: teachers resist and reproduce hegemonic positivity in a discourse community. Critical Studies in Education 65:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Declercq, Jana
2023. Talking about chronic pain: Misalignment in discussions of the body, mind and social aspects in pain clinic consultations. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 27:3 ► pp. 378 ff.
McMain, Emma M
2023. Drawing the line: Teachers affectively and discursively question what counts as “appropriate behavior” in schools. Power and Education
2021. Disagreement and mitigation in power-asymmetrical venture capital reality TV shows: a comparative case study of Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in China. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Greenbank, Emily & Meredith Marra
2020. Addressing societal discourses: negotiating an employable identity as a former refugee. Language and Intercultural Communication 20:2 ► pp. 110 ff.
Oyadiji, Olushola
2020. Politeness in the interactions of selected Nigerian news-based virtual communities. Discourse & Communication 14:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Goel, Pranav, Yoichi Matsuyama, Michael Madaio & Justine Cassell
2019. “I Think It Might Help If We Multiply, and Not Add”: Detecting Indirectness in Conversation. In 9th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue System Technology [Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 579], ► pp. 27 ff.
Jacobson, Danielle, Emily Glazer, Robin Mason, Deanna Duplessis, Kimberly Blom, Janice Du Mont, Navmeet Jassal, Gillian Einstein & Marja Tiilikainen
2018. The lived experience of female genital cutting (FGC) in Somali-Canadian women’s daily lives. PLOS ONE 13:11 ► pp. e0206886 ff.
Gockel, Christine
2017. Humor in Teams: Interpersonal Functions of Humor. In Humor at Work in Teams, Leadership, Negotiations, Learning and Health [SpringerBriefs in Psychology, ], ► pp. 31 ff.
König, Katharina
2017. „auch so ne lustige Geschichte“. In (Un)Komische Wirklichkeiten, ► pp. 299 ff.
Nikopoulos, James
2017. The stability of laughter. HUMOR 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Brunner, Marie-Louise, Stefan Diemer & Selina Schmidt
2015. Show that you know – Explanations, interactional identities and epistemic stance-taking in family talk and peer talk. Linguistics and Education 31 ► pp. 238 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.