Fox, Barbara A. (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (1987) Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of pragmatics 111: 561-588. BoP
Green, Georgia M. (1989) Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hirschberg, Julia, and Gregory Ward (1995) The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 241, 407-412. BoP
Houck, Noel (1991) Tag questions. A necessary pragmatic context. In: Lawrence Bouton and Yamuna Kachru (eds.). Pragmatics and language learning. Urbana II.: DEIL, 29-38.
Jucker. Andreas H. (1992) The pragmatics of the definitive article in English. In Frens J. H. Dois (ed.). Pragmatic Grammar Components. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 118-133.
Jucker, Andreas H. (1993) The discourse marker well: A relevance theoretical account. Journal of pragmatics 191: 435-452. BoP
Jucker, Andreas H. (1995) Review of Barbara A. Fox (1987 [paperback 1993]) Discourse structure and anaphora. Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Linguistische Berichte 158, 331-333.
Perner, Josef, and Alan Garnham (1988) Conditions for mutuality. Journal of semantics 6.3/4: 369-385.
Prince, Ellen F. (1978) A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54.4: 883-906 BoP
Prince, Ellen F. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.). Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223-256.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman. BoP
Schänk, Roger C. and R. P. Abelson (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. BoP
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987a) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987b) Discovering the context of utterance. Linguistics 25.1: 11-32.
Smith, Neil (ed.) (1982) Mutual knowledge. New York: Academic Press. BoP
Smith, Sara W. and Andreas H. Jucker. (1995) Foregrounding the role of common ground. Paper presented at the conference on pragmatics and language learning, Urbana, 11., March 1995.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson (1986) Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. BoP
Stalnaker, Robert C. (1974) Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger (eds.). Semantics and philosophy. New York: New York University Press. Reprinted in: Steven Davis (ed.). Pragmatics. A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 471-482.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
De Dijn, Melina & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2023. Rapport-building attempts in technology-mediated job interviews during the COVID-19 crisis. Linguistics Vanguard
2018. Alles klar?! – Informationen weitergeben, Informationen erfragen. In Gesprächsführung in technischen Berufen [Kommunikation und Medienmanagement, ], ► pp. 61 ff.
Buysse, Lieven
2017. The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics 121 ► pp. 40 ff.
Bowes, Andrea & Albert Katz
2015. Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory & Cognition 43:6 ► pp. 953 ff.
Gerrig, Richard J., William S. Horton & Amanda Stent
2011. Production and Comprehension of Unheralded Pronouns: A Corpus Analysis. Discourse Processes 48:3 ► pp. 161 ff.
Bublitz, Wolfram
2006. Chapter 11: It utterly boggles the mind: Knowledge, common ground and coherence. In Language and Memory, ► pp. 359 ff.
Nikula, Tarja
2005. English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. Linguistics and Education 16:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Hewitt, Lynne E
1998. Influence of question type on response adequacy in young adults with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders 31:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.