Article published In:
Living Metaphors and Metonymies
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 130155
References (47)
Barcelona, A.
(2003) The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113) (pp. 81–102). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The conceptual motivation of bahuvrihi compounds in English and Spanish. In M. Brdrar, S. Th. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (Human Cognitive Processing 32) (pp. 151–178). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Metonymy. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 143–167). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benczes, R.
(2006) Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations (Human Cognitive Processing 19). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
(2013) Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Branka-Rosoff, S., & Zinsmaier, T.
(1998) Hypallage. In G. Ueding (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Vol. 41. (pp.107–109). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brdar, M.
(2017) Metonymy and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, C., & Postal, P. M.
(2014) Classical NEG raising: An essay in the syntax of negation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at: [URL]
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P.
(2020) Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition, 121, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupriez, B.
(1991) A dictionary of literary devices (A. Halsall, Trans.). New York: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eliot, T. S.
(2005) The Waste Land and other poems. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Feist, J.
(2012) Premodifiers in English: Their structure and significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Genette, G.
(1972) Figures III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(2001) Syntax: An introduction. Vol. 21. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1980) The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 561, 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1985) Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) In defense of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 35–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R.
(2006) Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Neg-raising. In V. Déprez & M. T. Espinal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation (pp. 199–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H.
(1990) Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metonymy. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 407–422). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Malchukov, A., & Moravcsik, E.
(Eds.) (2014) Competing motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNally, L.
(2016) Modification. In M. Aloni & P. Dekker (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of formal semantics (pp. 442–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(2013) Goals and methods of generative syntax. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax (pp. 61–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
2022). Introduction to cognitive pragmatics (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 4). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
(1998) A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 755–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2018) What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (Human Cognitive Processing 60) (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, R.
(1986) Iconicity in syntax: The natural order of attributes. In P. Bouissac, M. Herzfeld, & R. Posner (Eds.), Iconicity: Essays on the nature of culture. Festschrift for Thomas A. Sebeok on his 65th birthday (pp. 305–337). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Prince, E.
(1976) The syntax and semantics of neg-raising, with evidence from French. Language 52 (2), 404–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proust, M.
(2005) In search of lost time. Vol. II: Within a budding grove. (C. K. S. Moncrieff, T. Kilmartin, & D. J. Enright. Trans.). London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
(1920) À l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs. Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue Française.Google Scholar
Radden, G.
(2021) Iconicity. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 268–296). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(2007) Towards a theory of metonymy. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader (pp. 335–359). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J.
(2008) Descriptive and discourse-referential modifiers in a layered model of the noun phrase. Linguistics 46 (4), 789–829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romoli, J.
(2013) A scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising. Linguistics and Philosophy, 361, 291–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2020) Figurative language: Relations and constraints. In J. Barnden & A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives (Figurative Language and Thought 10) (pp. 469–510). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Conceptual metonymy theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic issues. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 204–227). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U.
(1997) Speech act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L. Waugh (Eds), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, S.
(1957) Style in the French novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Virgil
(1995) The Aeneid (E. McCrorie, Trans.). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2003) A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18 (2), 245–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2023. Hypallage is a rare bird. Not.. Lingua 289  pp. 103511 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.